Cai Miao, Liu Echu, Tao Hongbing, Qian Zhengmin, Lin Xiaojun, Cheng Zhaohui
1 Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, China.
2 Saint Louis University, Saint Louis, MO.
Am J Med Qual. 2018 Mar/Apr;33(2):185-192. doi: 10.1177/1062860617708608. Epub 2017 Jun 7.
This study compares risk-standardized mortality rates (RSMRs) of patients with acute myocardial infarction among tertiary A (typically, advanced urban hospitals with more than 800 beds), tertiary B (urban hospitals with more than 500 beds), and secondary A hospitals (rural and urban hospitals with less than 500 beds) in Shanxi, China. In all, 43 500 acute myocardial infarction inpatient records from 93 hospitals were included. Hierarchical logistic regression was used to estimate RSMRs, and Dunn's post hoc test was used to make pairwise comparisons of RSMR between hospital levels. It was found that the median RSMRs of secondary A hospitals were significantly lower than those of tertiary A and tertiary B hospitals (at 1% and 10% significance level, respectively), while there was no significant difference between the median RSMRs in tertiary A and tertiary B hospitals. The reasons for significant disparity in quality of care among different hospital levels requires further exploration.
本研究比较了中国山西省三级甲等医院(通常为拥有800多张床位的先进城市医院)、三级乙等医院(拥有500多张床位的城市医院)和二级甲等医院(床位少于500张的农村和城市医院)中急性心肌梗死患者的风险标准化死亡率(RSMRs)。总共纳入了来自93家医院的43500份急性心肌梗死住院记录。采用分层逻辑回归估计RSMRs,并使用邓恩事后检验对不同医院级别之间的RSMR进行两两比较。结果发现,二级甲等医院的RSMRs中位数显著低于三级甲等医院和三级乙等医院(分别在1%和10%的显著性水平上),而三级甲等医院和三级乙等医院的RSMRs中位数之间没有显著差异。不同医院级别之间护理质量存在显著差异的原因需要进一步探究。