Lee Y H, Song G G
Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Lupus. 2018 Jan;27(1):112-119. doi: 10.1177/0961203317713143. Epub 2017 Jun 7.
Objective In this study, we aimed to assess the relative efficacy and safety of intravenous (IV) or subcutaneous (SC) belimumab compared with those of placebo in patients with active systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Methods We performed a Bayesian network meta-analysis to combine the direct and indirect evidence from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) examining the efficacy and safety of belimumab 1 mg/kg and 10 mg/kg IV administration, and belimumab 200 mg SC injection, and placebo in patients with active SLE despite having received standard therapy. Results Five RCTs (3460 patients) met the inclusion criteria. The SLE Responder Index (SRI) response rate at week 52 was significantly higher in the belimumab 10 mg/kg group than in the placebo group (OR 2.63, 95% CrI 2.14-3.23). Similarly, the SRI response rates were significantly higher in the belimumab 1 mg/kg, and belimumab 200 mg SC groups than in the placebo group (OR 2.42, 95% CrI 1.90-3.09; OR 1.71, 95% CrI 1.27-2.29). Ranking probability based on surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) indicated that belimumab 10 mg/kg had the highest probability of being the best treatment for achieving the SRI response (SUCRA = 0.9174), followed by belimumab 1 mg/kg (SUCRA = 0.7338), belimumab 200 mg SC (SUCRA = 0.3487), and placebo (SUCRA = 0.0000). However, a sensitivity test by omitting one outlier study showing low SRI response rate compared with the other three studies (11% vs. 33%, 40%, 48%) showed that belimumab 200 mg SC and belimumab 10 mg/kg had the highest probability of being the best treatment for achieving the SRI response (SUCRA = 0.7903, SUCRA = 0.7456), followed by belimumab 1 mg/kg, and placebo. The number of serious adverse events (SAEs) did not differ significantly among the four treatment options. Conclusions Belimumab at 1 and 10 mg/kg IV and belimumab 200 mg SC in combination with standard therapy was an efficacious intervention for active SLE, and was not associated with a significant risk of SAEs.
目的 在本研究中,我们旨在评估静脉注射(IV)或皮下注射(SC)贝利尤单抗与安慰剂相比,在活动性系统性红斑狼疮(SLE)患者中的相对疗效和安全性。方法 我们进行了一项贝叶斯网络荟萃分析,以综合来自随机对照试验(RCT)的直接和间接证据,这些试验考察了贝利尤单抗1mg/kg和10mg/kg静脉给药、贝利尤单抗200mg皮下注射以及安慰剂在已接受标准治疗的活动性SLE患者中的疗效和安全性。结果 五项RCT(3460例患者)符合纳入标准。贝利尤单抗10mg/kg组在第52周时的系统性红斑狼疮缓解指数(SRI)缓解率显著高于安慰剂组(OR 2.63,95% CrI 2.14 - 3.23)。同样,贝利尤单抗1mg/kg组和贝利尤单抗200mg皮下注射组的SRI缓解率也显著高于安慰剂组(OR 2.42,95% CrI 1.90 - 3.09;OR 1.71,95% CrI 1.27 - 2.29)。基于累积排序曲线下面积(SUCRA)的排序概率表明,贝利尤单抗10mg/kg成为实现SRI缓解的最佳治疗方法的概率最高(SUCRA = 0.9174),其次是贝利尤单抗1mg/kg(SUCRA = 0.7338)、贝利尤单抗200mg皮下注射(SUCRA = 0.3487)和安慰剂(SUCRA = 0.0000)。然而,通过剔除一项与其他三项研究相比SRI缓解率较低的异常值研究(11% 对33%、40%、48%)进行的敏感性测试表明,贝利尤单抗200mg皮下注射和贝利尤单抗10mg/kg成为实现SRI缓解的最佳治疗方法的概率最高(SUCRA = 0.7903,SUCRA = 0.7456),其次是贝利尤单抗1mg/kg和安慰剂。四种治疗方案中严重不良事件(SAE)的数量没有显著差异。结论 静脉注射1mg/kg和10mg/kg的贝利尤单抗以及皮下注射200mg的贝利尤单抗联合标准治疗是活动性SLE的有效干预措施,且与SAE的显著风险无关。