Department of Health and Rehabilitation, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, The Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Fundación García-Cugat, Barcelona, Spain.
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2018 Apr;26(4):1086-1095. doi: 10.1007/s00167-017-4592-9. Epub 2017 Jun 7.
To investigate whether the surgical technique of single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction, the visualization of anatomic surgical factors and the presence or absence of concomitant injuries at primary ACL reconstruction are able to predict patient-reported success and failure. The hypothesis of this study was that anatomic single-bundle surgical procedures would be predictive of patient-reported success.
This cohort study was based on data from the Swedish National Knee Ligament Register during the period of 1 January 2005 through 31 December 2014. Patients who underwent primary single-bundle ACL reconstruction with hamstring tendons were included. Details on surgical technique were collected using an online questionnaire comprising essential anatomic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction scoring checklist items, defined as the utilization of accessory medial portal drilling, anatomic tunnel placement, the visualization of insertion sites and pertinent landmarks. A univariate logistic regression model adjusted for age and gender was used to determine predictors of patient-reported success and failure, i.e. 20th and 80th percentile, respectively, in the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), 2 years after ACL reconstruction.
In the 6889 included patients, the surgical technique used for single-bundle ACL reconstruction did not predict the predefined patient-reported success or patient-reported failure in the KOOS. Patient-reported success was predicted by the absence of concomitant injury to the meniscus (OR = 0.81 [95% CI, 0.72-0.92], p = 0.001) and articular cartilage (OR = 0.70 [95% CI, 0.61-0.81], p < 0.001). Patient-reported failure was predicted by the presence of a concomitant injury to the articular cartilage (OR = 1.27 [95% CI, 1.11-1.44], p < 0.001).
Surgical techniques used in primary single-bundle ACL reconstruction did not predict the KOOS 2 years after the reconstruction. However, the absence of concomitant injuries at index surgery predicted patient-reported success in the KOOS. The results provide further evidence that concomitant injuries at ACL reconstruction affect subjective knee function and a detailed knowledge of the treatment of these concomitant injuries is needed.
Retrospective cohort study, Level III.
探讨前交叉韧带(ACL)单束重建的手术技术、解剖学手术因素的可视化以及初次 ACL 重建时是否存在合并伤,是否能够预测患者报告的成功和失败。本研究的假设是解剖学单束手术程序将预测患者报告的成功。
本队列研究基于 2005 年 1 月 1 日至 2014 年 12 月 31 日期间瑞典国家膝关节韧带登记处的数据。纳入接受单束 ACL 重建的腘绳肌腱患者。使用包含基本解剖 ACL 重建评分检查表项目的在线问卷收集手术技术细节,这些项目被定义为使用辅助内侧入路钻孔、解剖隧道放置、插入点和相关标志的可视化。使用调整年龄和性别的单变量逻辑回归模型确定患者报告的成功和失败的预测因素,即 ACL 重建后 2 年的膝关节损伤和骨关节炎结果评分(KOOS)的第 20 和第 80 百分位数。
在纳入的 6889 例患者中,用于单束 ACL 重建的手术技术并不能预测 KOOS 中预先设定的患者报告的成功或患者报告的失败。患者报告的成功由半月板(OR=0.81 [95%CI,0.72-0.92],p=0.001)和关节软骨(OR=0.70 [95%CI,0.61-0.81],p<0.001)无合并伤预测。患者报告的失败由关节软骨合并伤(OR=1.27 [95%CI,1.11-1.44],p<0.001)预测。
初次单束 ACL 重建中的手术技术并不能预测重建后 2 年的 KOOS。然而,指数手术时无合并伤预测了 KOOS 中的患者报告成功。结果进一步证明 ACL 重建时的合并伤会影响主观膝关节功能,需要详细了解这些合并伤的治疗方法。
回顾性队列研究,III 级。