Suppr超能文献

[测量饮食失调症治疗期间的变化:两种问卷类型的比较]

[Measuring changes during the treatment of eating disorders: a comparison of two types of questionnaires].

作者信息

Dingemans A E, van Furth E F

出版信息

Tijdschr Psychiatr. 2017;59(5):278-285.

Abstract

In mental health care routine outcome monitoring (ROM) has become an important part of everyday clinical practice in the Netherlands. It is important that the questionnaires involved are sensitive to therapeutic change. The Brief Symptom Inventory (BSI) is a generic instrument that is widely used and that seems to be responsive to therapeutic change. However, in relation to patients with an eating disorder, more valuable information might be obtained from a questionnaire that is better geared to the primary symptoms of the eating disorder.
AIM: To find out whether the BSI and the Eating Disorder Examination Questionnaire (EDE-Q), which is a questionnaire designed to measure eating disorder psychopathology, reveal different degrees of therapeutic change in patients with an eating disorder.
METHOD: The sample consisted of 1062 patients seeking treatment for an eating disorder (DSM-IV). We performed an analysis of variance (2 x 2 design) in order to detect any difference between the two instruments regarding their sensitivity to change at the two time points. Patients were divided into four categories: recovered, improved, unchanged or deteriorated. We used a chi-squares test to determine whether the two questionnaires differed with regard to the proportions they gave for improved and recovered patients.
RESULTS: The analyses revealed that in this patient group the EDE-Q was more sensitive to change than the BSI. The percentage of patients in the categories 'recovered' and 'improved' was higher in the EDE-Q than in the BSI. The same practice emerged with regards to the various subtypes of eating disorders.
CONCLUSION: It does seem to matter what type of questionnaire is used to measure the course and outcome of treatment. When responsiveness to change is being measured, it is important to use an instrument that assesses the symptoms that are the primary focus of treatment. If the primary aim is to reduce eating disorder symptoms, then the best type of questionnaire to use is one that assesses eating disorder psychopathology.

摘要

在精神卫生保健领域,常规结果监测(ROM)已成为荷兰日常临床实践的重要组成部分。重要的是,所涉及的问卷对治疗变化敏感。简明症状量表(BSI)是一种广泛使用的通用工具,似乎对治疗变化有反应。然而,对于饮食失调患者,从更适合饮食失调主要症状的问卷中可能会获得更有价值的信息。

目的

了解BSI和饮食失调检查问卷(EDE-Q,一种旨在测量饮食失调精神病理学的问卷)在饮食失调患者中是否显示出不同程度的治疗变化。

方法

样本包括1062名寻求饮食失调(DSM-IV)治疗的患者。我们进行了方差分析(2×2设计),以检测这两种工具在两个时间点对变化的敏感性之间的任何差异。患者分为四类:康复、改善、未改变或恶化。我们使用卡方检验来确定这两份问卷在改善和康复患者比例方面是否存在差异。

结果

分析表明,在该患者组中,EDE-Q比BSI对变化更敏感。EDE-Q中“康复”和“改善”类别的患者百分比高于BSI。在各种饮食失调亚型中也出现了同样的情况。

结论

使用何种类型的问卷来测量治疗过程和结果似乎确实很重要。在测量对变化的反应性时,使用能够评估治疗主要关注症状的工具很重要。如果主要目标是减轻饮食失调症状,那么最好使用评估饮食失调精神病理学的问卷类型。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验