Perlman Greg, Bartlett Elizabeth, DeLorenzo Christine, Weissman Myrna, McGrath Patrick, Ogden Todd, Jin Tony, Adams Phillip, Trivedi Madhukar, Kurian Benji, Oquendo Maria, McInnis Melvin, Weyandt Sarah, Fava Maurizio, Cooper Crystal, Malchow Ashley, Parsey Ramin
Department of Psychiatry, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York.
Department of Biomedical Engineering, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York.
Hum Brain Mapp. 2017 Sep;38(9):4370-4385. doi: 10.1002/hbm.23664. Epub 2017 Jun 8.
Reduced cortical thickness is a candidate biological marker of depression, although findings are inconsistent. This could reflect analytic heterogeneity, such as use of region-wise cortical thickness based on the Freesurfer Desikan-Killiany (DK) atlas or surface-based morphometry (SBM). The Freesurfer Destrieux (DS) atlas (more, smaller regions) has not been utilized in depression studies. This could also reflect differential gender and age effects.
Cortical thickness was collected from 170 currently depressed adults and 52 never-depressed adults. Visually inspected and approved Freesurfer-generated surfaces were used to extract cortical thickness estimates according to the DK atlas (68 regions) and DS atlas (148 regions) for region-wise analysis (216 total regions) and for SBM.
Overall, except for small effects in a few regions, the two region-wise approaches generally failed to discriminate depressed adults from nondepressed adults or current episode severity. Differential effects by age and gender were also rare and small in magnitude. Using SBM, depressed adults showed a significantly thicker cluster in the left supramarginal gyrus than nondepressed adults (P = 0.047) but there were no associations with current episode severity.
Three analytic approaches (i.e., DK atlas, DS atlas, and SBM) converge on the notion that cortical thickness is a relatively weak discriminator of current depression status. Differential age and gender effects do not appear to represent key moderators. Robust associations with demographic factors will likely hinder translation of cortical thickness into a clinically useful biomarker. Hum Brain Mapp, 2017. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Hum Brain Mapp 38:4370-4385, 2017. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
皮质厚度降低是抑郁症的一个潜在生物学标志物,尽管研究结果并不一致。这可能反映了分析异质性,例如基于Freesurfer Desikan-Killiany(DK)图谱或基于表面的形态测量法(SBM)使用区域特异性皮质厚度。Freesurfer Destrieux(DS)图谱(区域更多、更小)尚未在抑郁症研究中得到应用。这也可能反映了不同的性别和年龄效应。
从170名当前患有抑郁症的成年人和52名从未患过抑郁症的成年人中收集皮质厚度数据。使用经视觉检查并批准的Freesurfer生成的表面,根据DK图谱(68个区域)和DS图谱(148个区域)提取皮质厚度估计值,用于区域特异性分析(共216个区域)和SBM。
总体而言,除了少数区域有微小效应外,两种区域特异性方法通常无法区分抑郁症成年人与非抑郁症成年人,也无法区分当前发作的严重程度。年龄和性别的差异效应也很少见且程度较小。使用SBM时,抑郁症成年人在左缘上回的一个簇比非抑郁症成年人显著更厚(P = 0.047),但与当前发作严重程度无关。
三种分析方法(即DK图谱、DS图谱和SBM)都表明,皮质厚度对当前抑郁状态的区分能力相对较弱。年龄和性别的差异效应似乎不是关键调节因素。与人口统计学因素的强关联可能会阻碍将皮质厚度转化为临床上有用的生物标志物。《人类大脑图谱》,2017年。©2017威利期刊公司。《人类大脑图谱》38:4370 - 4385,2017年。©2017威利期刊公司。