Wohlfahrt Peter, Cífková Renata, Movsisyan Narine, Kunzová Šárka, Lešovský Jiří, Homolka Martin, Soška Vladimír, Dobšák Petr, Lopez-Jimenez Francisco, Sochor Ondřej
aInternational Clinical Research Center, St. Anne's University Hospital, Brno bCenter for Cardiovascular Prevention of the First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and Thomayer Hospital cLaboratory for Atherosclerosis Research, Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Prague, Czech Republic dDivision of Cardiovascular Diseases, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA e2nd Clinic of Internal Medicine, Masaryk University fDepartment of Laboratory Methods, Masaryk University gDepartment of Clinical Biochemistry hDepartment of Sports Medicine and Rehabilitation, St. Anne's University Hospital of Brno iDepartment of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic.
J Hypertens. 2017 Nov;35(11):2238-2244. doi: 10.1097/HJH.0000000000001437.
Cardio-ankle vascular index (CAVI), a parameter of arterial stiffness, has been increasingly used for cardiovascular risk estimation. Currently used CAVI reference values are derived from the Japanese population. It is not clear whether the same reference values can be used in the white population. The aim of the present study was to describe cardiovascular risk factors influencing CAVI and to establish CAVI reference values.
A total of 2160 individuals randomly selected from the Brno city population aged 25-65 years were examined. Of these, 1347 patients were free from cardiovascular disease, nondiabetic and untreated by antihypertensive or lipid-lowering drugs, forming the reference value population. CAVI was measured using the VaSera VS-1000 device (Fukuda Denshi, Tokyo, Japan).
At each blood pressure (BP) level, there was a quadratic association between CAVI and age, except for a linear association in the optimal BP group. Although there was no association between BP and CAVI in younger patients, there was a linear association between CAVI and BP after 40 years of age. Reference values by age and sex were established. In each age group, except for the male 60-65-year group, reference values in our population were lower than in the Japanese one with the difference ranging from -0.29 to 0.21 for men, and from -0.38 to -0.03 for women.
This is the first study providing CAVI reference values in a random sample of the white population. Our results suggest that the currently used values slightly overestimate CAVI in younger white, possibly underestimating cardiovascular risk.
心踝血管指数(CAVI)作为动脉僵硬度的一个参数,已越来越多地用于心血管风险评估。目前使用的CAVI参考值源自日本人群。尚不清楚相同的参考值是否可用于白种人群。本研究的目的是描述影响CAVI的心血管危险因素并建立CAVI参考值。
对从布尔诺市25至65岁人群中随机选取的2160名个体进行了检查。其中,1347名患者无心血管疾病、非糖尿病且未接受抗高血压或降脂药物治疗,构成参考值人群。使用VaSera VS - 1000设备(日本东京福田电子)测量CAVI。
在每个血压(BP)水平,CAVI与年龄之间存在二次关联,但在最佳血压组中为线性关联。虽然年轻患者的血压与CAVI之间无关联,但40岁以后CAVI与血压之间存在线性关联。建立了按年龄和性别的参考值。在每个年龄组中,除了60 - 65岁男性组外,我们人群中的参考值低于日本人群,男性差异范围为 - 0.29至0.21,女性为 - 0.38至 - 0.03。
这是第一项在白种人群随机样本中提供CAVI参考值的研究。我们的结果表明,目前使用的值在年轻白种人中略微高估了CAVI,可能低估了心血管风险。