Suppr超能文献

一项比较氰基丙烯酸酯粘合剂与缝线用于皮肤癌患者伤口闭合的前瞻性、随机、单盲研究。

A Prospective, Randomized, Single-Blind Study Comparing Cyanoacrylate Adhesives to Sutures for Wound Closure in Skin Cancer Patients.

作者信息

Bartenstein Diana W, Cummins Deborah L, Rogers Gary S

机构信息

*Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts; †Massachusetts Dermatology Associates, Beverly, Massachusetts; ‡Beverly Hospital, Beverly, Massachusetts.

出版信息

Dermatol Surg. 2017 Nov;43(11):1371-1378. doi: 10.1097/DSS.0000000000001200.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Cyanoacrylate tissue adhesives are not more likely to result in wound dehiscence or infection than sutured closures. However, suturing is the gold standard for optimal cosmetic appearance of scars.

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether cyanoacrylate tissue adhesives produce a cosmetic outcome equivalent to sutures at 3 months. Secondary outcomes include time for wound closure, time spent on wound care, and surgeon and patient satisfaction.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Seventy-one patients scheduled for skin cancer excision at Beverly Hospital were included in this prospective, randomized, single-blind study. Cosmetic appearance was assessed by a masked panel of dermatologists and plastic surgeons who evaluated digital photographs. Secondary outcomes were assessed by nursing recordings and patient and surgeon evaluations.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference in wound appearance (Visual Analog Scale: p = .4693, modified Hollander Wound Evaluation Score: p = .6413) between adhesives and sutures. It was faster and easier for a surgeon to use adhesives, and subjects spent less time caring for and were more satisfied by wounds sealed with adhesives than sutures.

CONCLUSION

Cyanoacrylate tissue adhesives produce cosmetic outcomes that are not statistically significantly different than sutures; furthermore, they are associated with fast application, easy wound care, and patient satisfaction.

摘要

背景

与缝合闭合相比,氰基丙烯酸酯组织粘合剂导致伤口裂开或感染的可能性并不更高。然而,缝合是实现疤痕最佳美观效果的金标准。

目的

确定氰基丙烯酸酯组织粘合剂在3个月时是否能产生与缝合线相当的美容效果。次要结果包括伤口闭合时间、伤口护理时间以及外科医生和患者的满意度。

材料和方法

本前瞻性、随机、单盲研究纳入了71名计划在贝弗利医院进行皮肤癌切除的患者。由一组皮肤科医生和整形外科医生组成的盲评小组通过评估数码照片来评估美容效果。次要结果通过护理记录以及患者和外科医生的评估来进行评估。

结果

粘合剂和缝合线在伤口外观方面没有显著差异(视觉模拟量表:p = 0.4693,改良霍兰德伤口评估评分:p = 0.6413)。外科医生使用粘合剂更快、更简便,与缝合伤口相比,使用粘合剂封闭的伤口患者护理时间更短且满意度更高。

结论

氰基丙烯酸酯组织粘合剂产生的美容效果与缝合线相比在统计学上无显著差异;此外,它们具有应用迅速、伤口护理简便且患者满意度高的特点。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验