Maguire-Jack Kathryn, Font Sarah A
1 College of Social Work, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.
2 Department of Sociology and Criminology, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, USA.
Child Maltreat. 2017 Aug;22(3):215-226. doi: 10.1177/1077559517711806. Epub 2017 Jun 8.
Families are impacted by a variety of risk and protective factors for maltreatment at multiple levels of the social ecology. Individual- and neighborhood-level poverty has consistently been shown to be associated with higher risk for child abuse and neglect. The current study sought to understand the ways in which individual- and neighborhood-level risk and protective factors affect physical child abuse and child neglect and whether these factors differed for families based on their individual poverty status. Specifically, we used a three-level hierarchical linear model (families nested within census tracts and nested within cities) to estimate the relationships between physical child abuse and child neglect and neighborhood structural factors, neighborhood processes, and individual characteristics. We compared these relationships between lower and higher income families in a sample of approximately 3,000 families from 50 cities in the State of California. We found that neighborhood-level disadvantage was especially detrimental for families in poverty and that neighborhood-level protective processes (social) were not associated with physical child abuse and child neglect for impoverished families, but that they had a protective effect for higher income families.
在社会生态的多个层面,家庭会受到各种虐待风险因素和保护因素的影响。个人层面和社区层面的贫困一直被证明与儿童遭受虐待和忽视的较高风险相关。当前的研究旨在了解个人层面和社区层面的风险因素及保护因素如何影响儿童身体虐待和忽视,以及这些因素对于不同贫困状况家庭是否存在差异。具体而言,我们使用了三级分层线性模型(家庭嵌套于普查区,普查区嵌套于城市)来估计儿童身体虐待和忽视与社区结构因素、社区过程及个人特征之间的关系。在来自加利福尼亚州50个城市的约3000个家庭样本中,我们比较了低收入家庭和高收入家庭之间的这些关系。我们发现,社区层面的不利因素对贫困家庭尤其有害,而社区层面的保护过程(社会方面)与贫困家庭的儿童身体虐待和忽视并无关联,但对高收入家庭具有保护作用。