Suppr超能文献

评估儿童时期的社区经历。

Assessing Childhood Community Experiences.

作者信息

Addante Samantha, Kraft Jacob D, Clement Déjà, Erato Gina, Quigley Ashley, Armans Mira, Fields Kristin, Oliphant Vanessa, Wingate LaRicka, Ciciolla Lucia

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Oklahoma State University, 116 Psychology Building, Stillwater, OK 74078.

出版信息

Child Youth Serv Rev. 2024 Sep;164. doi: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2024.107851. Epub 2024 Aug 20.

Abstract

AIMS

Community-level childhood experiences make up important aspects of early life that are associated with long-term health outcomes. However, to date, there have been no validated measures that assess community-level experiences during childhood. Thus, we aimed to develop and validate a measure that would assess community-level experiences associated with both risk and resilience.

METHODS

Data were collected from 577 undergraduate participants (68.7% female). Exploratory and confirmatory factor analytic strategies were used to examine the factor structure of the Childhood Community Experiences Scale (CCES) comprised of the Community Risk Scale and the Community Protective Scale. Convergent validity and predictive utility of the CCES with existing measures of individual risk and resilience and adult psychosocial functioning were also examined.

RESULTS

Results indicated a 5-factor solution for the Community Risk Scale and a 6-factor solution for the Community Protective Scale to fit the data best. Further, results suggest the convergent validity and predictive utility of the CCES with measures of adult psychosocial functioning.

CONCLUSION

This measure allows for a brief, self-report assessment that can be used to assess childhood community-level risk and protective factors.

摘要

目的

社区层面的童年经历构成了早期生活的重要方面,这些经历与长期健康结果相关。然而,迄今为止,尚无经过验证的措施来评估童年时期社区层面的经历。因此,我们旨在开发并验证一种能够评估与风险和恢复力相关的社区层面经历的措施。

方法

数据收集自577名本科参与者(68.7%为女性)。采用探索性和验证性因素分析策略,以检验由社区风险量表和社区保护量表组成的童年社区经历量表(CCES)的因素结构。还检验了CCES与现有个体风险和恢复力测量指标以及成人心理社会功能的收敛效度和预测效用。

结果

结果表明,社区风险量表的五因素解决方案和社区保护量表的六因素解决方案最适合数据。此外,结果表明CCES与成人心理社会功能测量指标具有收敛效度和预测效用。

结论

该措施允许进行简短的自我报告评估,可用于评估童年社区层面的风险和保护因素。

相似文献

1
Assessing Childhood Community Experiences.评估儿童时期的社区经历。
Child Youth Serv Rev. 2024 Sep;164. doi: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2024.107851. Epub 2024 Aug 20.
7
Nutritional interventions for survivors of childhood cancer.儿童癌症幸存者的营养干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Aug 22;2016(8):CD009678. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009678.pub2.
8
Interventions for preventing occupational irritant hand dermatitis.预防职业性刺激性手部皮炎的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Apr 30;4(4):CD004414. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004414.pub3.
10
Reminiscence therapy for dementia.痴呆症的回忆疗法
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Mar 1;3(3):CD001120. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001120.pub3.

本文引用的文献

5
Prevalence of adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) among US children.美国儿童不良童年经历(ACEs)的发生率。
Child Abuse Negl. 2019 Jun;92:209-218. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2019.04.010. Epub 2019 Apr 16.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验