Suppr超能文献

比较电子烟液、气溶胶和溶剂的细胞毒性。

Comparing the cytotoxicity of electronic cigarette fluids, aerosols and solvents.

机构信息

Cell Molecular and Developmental Biology Graduate Program, University of California, Riverside, California, USA.

Department of Cell Biology and Neuroscience, University of California, Riverside, California, USA.

出版信息

Tob Control. 2018 May;27(3):325-333. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2016-053472. Epub 2017 Jun 8.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

As thousands of electronic cigarette (e-cigarette) refill fluids continue to be formulated and distributed, there is a growing need to understand the cytotoxicity of the flavouring chemicals and solvents used in these products to ensure they are safe. The purpose of this study was to compare the cytotoxicity of e-cigarette refill fluids/solvents and their corresponding aerosols using in vitro cultured cells.

METHODS

E-cigarette refill fluids and do-it-yourself products were screened in liquid and aerosol form for cytotoxicity using the MTT (3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide) assay. The sensitivity of human pulmonary fibroblasts, lung epithelial cells (A549) and human embryonic stem cells to liquids and aerosols was compared. Aerosols were produced using Johnson Creek's Vea cartomizer style e-cigarette.

RESULTS

A hierarchy of potency was established for the aerosolised products. Our data show that (1) e-cigarette aerosols can produce cytotoxic effects in cultured cells, (2) four patterns of cytotoxicity were found when comparing refill fluids and their corresponding aerosols, (3) fluids accurately predicted aerosol cytotoxicity 74% of the time, (4) stem cells were often more sensitive to aerosols than differentiated cells and (5) 91% of the aerosols made from refill fluids containing only glycerin were cytotoxic, even when produced at a low voltage.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data show that various flavours/brands of e-cigarette refill fluids and their aerosols are cytotoxic and demonstrate the need for further evaluation of e-cigarette products to better understand their potential health effects.

摘要

背景

随着数千种电子烟(e-cigarette)补充液不断被配制和分发,人们越来越需要了解这些产品中使用的调味化学品和溶剂的细胞毒性,以确保它们的安全性。本研究的目的是比较电子烟补充液/溶剂及其相应气溶胶在体外培养细胞中的细胞毒性。

方法

使用 MTT(3-(4,5-二甲基噻唑-2-基)-2,5-二苯基四氮唑溴盐)测定法,以液体和气溶胶形式筛选电子烟补充液和 DIY 产品的细胞毒性。比较人肺成纤维细胞、肺上皮细胞(A549)和人胚胎干细胞对液体和气溶胶的敏感性。气溶胶是使用 Johnson Creek 的 Vea cartomizer 风格电子烟产生的。

结果

建立了气溶胶化产品的效力等级。我们的数据表明:(1)电子烟气溶胶可以在培养细胞中产生细胞毒性作用;(2)比较补充液及其相应气溶胶时,发现了四种细胞毒性模式;(3)补充液准确预测气溶胶细胞毒性的概率为 74%;(4)与分化细胞相比,干细胞对气溶胶通常更敏感;(5)即使在低电压下,由仅含甘油的补充液制成的 91%气溶胶具有细胞毒性。

结论

我们的数据表明,各种口味/品牌的电子烟补充液及其气溶胶具有细胞毒性,并表明需要进一步评估电子烟产品,以更好地了解它们的潜在健康影响。

相似文献

1
Comparing the cytotoxicity of electronic cigarette fluids, aerosols and solvents.比较电子烟液、气溶胶和溶剂的细胞毒性。
Tob Control. 2018 May;27(3):325-333. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2016-053472. Epub 2017 Jun 8.

引用本文的文献

1
E‑Liquid and Aerosol Characterization of Popular Disposable E‑Cigarettes.流行一次性电子烟的电子液体和气溶胶特性分析
ACS Omega. 2025 Jul 3;10(27):29615-29627. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.5c03167. eCollection 2025 Jul 15.
8
Genotoxicity and mutagenicity assessment of electronic cigarette liquids.电子烟液的遗传毒性和致突变性评估。
Ann Thorac Med. 2024 Jul-Sep;19(3):222-227. doi: 10.4103/atm.atm_59_24. Epub 2024 Jul 4.

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验