Stuart H
Centre for Health Services and Policy Research, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.
Glob Ment Health (Camb). 2016 May 10;3:e17. doi: 10.1017/gmh.2016.11. eCollection 2016.
This paper presents a narrative review of anti-stigma programming using examples from different countries to understand and describe current best practices in the field. Results highlight the importance of targeting the behavioural outcomes of the stigmatization process (discrimination and social inequity), which is consistent with rights-based or social justice models that emphasize social and economic equity for people with disabilities (such as equitable access to services, education, work, etc.). They also call into question large public education approaches in favour of more targeted contact-based interventions. Finally, to add to the research base on best practices, anti-stigma programs are encouraged to create alliances with university researchers in order to critically evaluate their activities and build better, evidence informed practices.
本文通过列举不同国家的实例,对反污名化项目进行了叙述性综述,以了解和描述该领域当前的最佳实践。结果强调了针对污名化过程的行为结果(歧视和社会不平等)的重要性,这与基于权利或社会正义的模式相一致,这些模式强调残疾人的社会和经济公平(如平等获得服务、教育、工作等)。它们还对大规模的公众教育方法提出质疑,主张采用更具针对性的基于接触的干预措施。最后,为了增加关于最佳实践的研究基础,鼓励反污名化项目与大学研究人员建立联盟,以便批判性地评估其活动并建立更好的、基于证据的实践。