Meeks Brett D, Meeks Natalie M, Froehle Andrew W, Wareing Emily, Bonner Kevin F
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Wright State University, Dayton, Ohio, USA.
Kettering Medical Center, Kettering, Ohio, USA.
Orthop J Sports Med. 2017 May 25;5(5):2325967117707737. doi: 10.1177/2325967117707737. eCollection 2017 May.
Biceps tenotomy and tenodesis are frequently performed for proximal biceps lesions; however, there continues to be debate as to which method is superior. This study examined patient-reported outcomes after biceps tenotomy.
Biceps tenotomy in the setting of concomitant shoulder pathology is a reasonable option with high satisfaction rates and a low incidence of pain and cramping in middle-aged to older individuals.
Case series; Level of evidence, 4.
A total of 104 patients (mean age, 63.5 years; range, 40-81 years) were evaluated at the time of surgery and at a mean follow-up of 38.4 months (range, 22-57 months). Biceps tenotomy was performed as a component of more extensive shoulder surgery in all patients. Patient satisfaction, frequency of cramping and spasms, biceps pain, weakness, and cosmetic deformity were evaluated at over 1-year follow-up.
Ninety-one percent of patients were satisfied or very satisfied with their surgical outcome, and 95% would have their surgery again. Three patients who reported being unsatisfied or very unsatisfied had either advanced glenohumeral arthritis or an irreparable rotator cuff tear. Cosmetic deformity occurred in 13% of patients. Twenty percent reported spasms and cramping in their biceps, and 19% reported some biceps pain; however, frequency of spasms and cramping was typically once weekly, and biceps pain was reported as severe or very severe in only 2 patients. Subjective biceps weakness was reported in 17% of patients. Age had no effect on outcome measures, and female sex was associated with less limitation and greater satisfaction after tenotomy compared with men.
Our results indicate that patient-reported downsides to biceps tenotomy were usually mild and/or infrequent and did not affect patient satisfaction. We conclude that biceps tenotomy is a viable option that can lead to a high rate of patient satisfaction and outcomes in middle-aged to older individuals undergoing shoulder surgery with biceps pathology.
肱二头肌肌腱切断术和肌腱固定术常用于治疗肱二头肌近端损伤;然而,关于哪种方法更优仍存在争议。本研究调查了肱二头肌肌腱切断术后患者报告的结果。
在伴有肩部病变的情况下,肱二头肌肌腱切断术是一种合理的选择,中年至老年患者的满意率高,疼痛和痉挛发生率低。
病例系列;证据等级,4级。
共104例患者(平均年龄63.5岁;范围40 - 81岁)在手术时及平均38.4个月(范围22 - 57个月)的随访时接受评估。所有患者的肱二头肌肌腱切断术均作为更广泛肩部手术的一部分进行。在超过1年的随访中评估患者满意度、痉挛和抽搐频率、肱二头肌疼痛、无力及外观畸形情况。
91%的患者对手术结果满意或非常满意,95%的患者愿意再次接受该手术。3例报告不满意或非常不满意的患者患有晚期盂肱关节炎或不可修复的肩袖撕裂。13%的患者出现外观畸形。20%的患者报告肱二头肌有痉挛和抽搐,19%的患者报告有一些肱二头肌疼痛;然而,痉挛和抽搐频率通常为每周一次,只有2例患者报告肱二头肌疼痛严重或非常严重。17%的患者报告有主观肱二头肌无力。年龄对结果指标无影响,与男性相比,女性在肌腱切断术后的受限较少且满意度更高。
我们的结果表明,患者报告的肱二头肌肌腱切断术的不利方面通常较轻和/或不常见,且不影响患者满意度。我们得出结论,肱二头肌肌腱切断术是一种可行的选择,对于患有肱二头肌病变并接受肩部手术的中年至老年患者,可带来较高的患者满意度和良好结果。