Suppr超能文献

倡导科学:从生物技术案例研究角度解释这一术语。

Advocacy Science: Explaining the Term with Case Studies from Biotechnology.

机构信息

Centre of Development Studies, University of Cambridge, Alison Richard Building, 7 West Road, Cambridge, UK.

Higher School of Economics, Moscow, Russia.

出版信息

Sci Eng Ethics. 2018 Apr;24(2):455-477. doi: 10.1007/s11948-017-9916-0. Epub 2017 Jun 8.

Abstract

The paper discusses the use of term 'advocacy science' which is communication of science which goes beyond simple reporting of scientific findings, using the case study of biotechnology. It argues that advocacy science should be used to distinguish the engagement of modern civil society organizations to interpret scientific knowledge for their lobbying. It illustrates how this new communicative process has changed political discourse in science and general perception of the role of science in contemporary society.

摘要

本文讨论了“倡导科学”这一术语的使用,即超越简单报告科学发现的科学传播,以生物技术为例进行了说明。本文认为,应该使用倡导科学来区分现代民间社会组织为其游说目的而对科学知识的参与诠释。本文说明了这一新的传播过程如何改变了科学领域的政治话语以及公众对科学在当代社会中作用的普遍看法。

相似文献

1
Advocacy Science: Explaining the Term with Case Studies from Biotechnology.
Sci Eng Ethics. 2018 Apr;24(2):455-477. doi: 10.1007/s11948-017-9916-0. Epub 2017 Jun 8.
2
Attitudes to biotechnology: estimating the opinions of a better-informed public.
New Genet Soc. 2005 Apr;24(1):31-56. doi: 10.1080/14636770500037693.
3
Science communication as political communication.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014 Sep 16;111 Suppl 4(Suppl 4):13585-92. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1317516111. Epub 2014 Sep 15.
4
The science of protests: how to shape public opinion and swing votes.
Nature. 2024 Jun;630(8018):804-806. doi: 10.1038/d41586-024-02082-5.
5
Battlefield: hitting the supporters of biotechnology.
Nature. 2009 Oct 15;461(7266):875. doi: 10.1038/461875a.
6
GM crops: a continent divided.
Nature. 2003 Nov 20;426(6964):224-6. doi: 10.1038/426224a.
7
Genetically modified food in the news: media representations of the GM debate in the UK.
Public Underst Sci. 2010 Jan;19(1):98-114. doi: 10.1177/0963662508088669.
8
Popular misconceptions: agricultural biotechnology.
N Biotechnol. 2010 Dec 31;27(6):724-8. doi: 10.1016/j.nbt.2010.03.006. Epub 2010 Mar 30.
9
GM foods and the misperception of risk perception.
Risk Anal. 2004 Feb;24(1):185-94. doi: 10.1111/j.0272-4332.2004.00421.x.
10
Are ME/CFS Patient Organizations "Militant"? : Patient Protest in a Medical Controversy.
J Bioeth Inq. 2018 Sep;15(3):393-401. doi: 10.1007/s11673-018-9866-5. Epub 2018 Jul 3.

本文引用的文献

1
On the limits of public engagement for the governance of emerging technologies.
Public Underst Sci. 2014 Jan;23(1):38-42. doi: 10.1177/0963662512468657.
2
A mirror for science.
Public Underst Sci. 2014 Jan;23(1):21-6. doi: 10.1177/0963662513505509.
3
Letter to the editor. retraction of the Séralini et al. article.
Food Chem Toxicol. 2014 Mar;65:392. doi: 10.1016/j.fct.2014.01.004. Epub 2014 Jan 3.
4
Letter to the editor: retraction of the Séralini et al. article.
Food Chem Toxicol. 2014 Mar;65:391. doi: 10.1016/j.fct.2014.01.003. Epub 2014 Jan 3.
5
Citizen science as seen by scientists: Methodological, epistemological and ethical dimensions.
Public Underst Sci. 2014 Jan;23(1):107-20. doi: 10.1177/0963662513497324. Epub 2013 Aug 27.
9
Long term toxicity of a Roundup herbicide and a Roundup-tolerant genetically modified maize.
Food Chem Toxicol. 2012 Nov;50(11):4221-31. doi: 10.1016/j.fct.2012.08.005. Epub 2012 Sep 19.
10
Playing God with DNA.
New Times. 1977 Jan 7;8(1):48-49+.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验