论新兴技术治理中公众参与的限度 - Suppr

Suppr

超能文献

On the limits of public engagement for the governance of emerging technologies.

作者信息

Sturgis Patrick

机构信息

University of Southampton, UK.

出版信息

Public Underst Sci. 2014 Jan;23(1):38-42. doi: 10.1177/0963662512468657.

DOI:10.1177/0963662512468657

PMID:24434710

Abstract

摘要

相似文献

On the limits of public engagement for the governance of emerging technologies.

Public Underst Sci. 2014 Jan;23(1):38-42. doi: 10.1177/0963662512468657.

Reflecting on public engagement and science policy.

Public Underst Sci. 2014 Jan;23(1):27-31. doi: 10.1177/0963662513482614.

From 'trust us' to participatory governance: Deliberative publics and science policy.

Public Underst Sci. 2014 Jan;23(1):48-52. doi: 10.1177/0963662512472160.

Why should we promote public engagement with science?

Public Underst Sci. 2014 Jan;23(1):4-15. doi: 10.1177/0963662513518154.

Engaging with the political imaginaries of science: Near misses and future targets.

Public Underst Sci. 2014 Jan;23(1):16-20. doi: 10.1177/0963662513476220.

Building the capacity for public engagement with science in the United States.

Public Underst Sci. 2014 Jan;23(1):53-9. doi: 10.1177/0963662513476403.

Experiments in engagement: Designing public engagement with science and technology for capacity building.

Public Underst Sci. 2017 Aug;26(6):634-649. doi: 10.1177/0963662515620970. Epub 2016 Jan 14.

Art for public engagement on emerging and controversial technologies: A literature review.

Public Underst Sci. 2022 Aug;31(6):694-710. doi: 10.1177/09636625221093213. Epub 2022 May 14.

From deficit to democracy (re-visited).

Public Underst Sci. 2014 Jan;23(1):71-6. doi: 10.1177/0963662513510646.

A mirror for science.

Public Underst Sci. 2014 Jan;23(1):21-6. doi: 10.1177/0963662513505509.

引用本文的文献

Public attitudes to genetic technology for invasive pest control and preferences for engagement and information: a segmentation analysis.

Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2025 Jan 22;12:1388512. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2024.1388512. eCollection 2024.

Anticipatory gaps challenge the public governance of heritable human genome editing.

J Med Ethics. 2025 Apr 24;51(5):jme-2023-109801. doi: 10.1136/jme-2023-109801.

Societal and Ethical Impacts of Germline Genome Editing: How Can We Secure Human Rights?

CRISPR J. 2019 Oct;2(5):293-298. doi: 10.1089/crispr.2019.0042.

Advocacy Science: Explaining the Term with Case Studies from Biotechnology.

Sci Eng Ethics. 2018 Apr;24(2):455-477. doi: 10.1007/s11948-017-9916-0. Epub 2017 Jun 8.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述，助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型，支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验

相似文献

On the limits of public engagement for the governance of emerging technologies.

Public Underst Sci. 2014 Jan;23(1):38-42. doi: 10.1177/0963662512468657.

Reflecting on public engagement and science policy.

Public Underst Sci. 2014 Jan;23(1):27-31. doi: 10.1177/0963662513482614.

From 'trust us' to participatory governance: Deliberative publics and science policy.

Public Underst Sci. 2014 Jan;23(1):48-52. doi: 10.1177/0963662512472160.

Why should we promote public engagement with science?

Public Underst Sci. 2014 Jan;23(1):4-15. doi: 10.1177/0963662513518154.

Engaging with the political imaginaries of science: Near misses and future targets.

Public Underst Sci. 2014 Jan;23(1):16-20. doi: 10.1177/0963662513476220.

Building the capacity for public engagement with science in the United States.

Public Underst Sci. 2014 Jan;23(1):53-9. doi: 10.1177/0963662513476403.

Experiments in engagement: Designing public engagement with science and technology for capacity building.

Public Underst Sci. 2017 Aug;26(6):634-649. doi: 10.1177/0963662515620970. Epub 2016 Jan 14.

Art for public engagement on emerging and controversial technologies: A literature review.

Public Underst Sci. 2022 Aug;31(6):694-710. doi: 10.1177/09636625221093213. Epub 2022 May 14.

From deficit to democracy (re-visited).

Public Underst Sci. 2014 Jan;23(1):71-6. doi: 10.1177/0963662513510646.

A mirror for science.

Public Underst Sci. 2014 Jan;23(1):21-6. doi: 10.1177/0963662513505509.

引用本文的文献

Public attitudes to genetic technology for invasive pest control and preferences for engagement and information: a segmentation analysis.

Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2025 Jan 22;12:1388512. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2024.1388512. eCollection 2024.

Anticipatory gaps challenge the public governance of heritable human genome editing.

J Med Ethics. 2025 Apr 24;51(5):jme-2023-109801. doi: 10.1136/jme-2023-109801.

Societal and Ethical Impacts of Germline Genome Editing: How Can We Secure Human Rights?

CRISPR J. 2019 Oct;2(5):293-298. doi: 10.1089/crispr.2019.0042.

Advocacy Science: Explaining the Term with Case Studies from Biotechnology.

Sci Eng Ethics. 2018 Apr;24(2):455-477. doi: 10.1007/s11948-017-9916-0. Epub 2017 Jun 8.