• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

电动粉碎器移除对子宫切除术实践模式的影响。

Impact of power morcellator removal on hysterectomy practice patterns.

作者信息

Wesol Adrianne, Woolley Shauna

机构信息

Washington Permanente Medical Group, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology-Midwifery, Seattle, WA, United States.

University of Washington Medical Student, Seattle, WA, United States.

出版信息

Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2017 Aug;215:41-44. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2017.05.015. Epub 2017 May 21.

DOI:10.1016/j.ejogrb.2017.05.015
PMID:28599164
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This study was a quality improvement project investigating patterns of hysterectomy practice including changes in surgical techniques and patient outcomes after manufacturer withdrawal of a laparoscopic power morcellator from our hospitals in July 2014.

STUDY DESIGN

This time-series pre and post retrospective review examined data from electronic health records, comparing one year when a laparoscopic power morcellator was available (Year 1, mid-2013 to mid-2014) to one year after withdrawal (Year 2, mid-2014 to mid-2015). Data were from patients of 8 gynecologists in a multispecialty group associated with a large, integrated care and coverage delivery system in Washington State. Analyzed were 100 patients for Year 1 and 133 patients for Year 2. Analysis was by two-sided chi-square tests comparing practice patterns and outcomes in the two years.

RESULTS

For hysterectomy route, no significant difference was seen between Years 1 and 2 in percent surgeries that were abdominal or laparoscopic (including robotic). For minimally invasive hysterectomies, significantly more transvaginal hysterectomies were performed in Year 2 (22%) than Year 1 (14%) (p<0.05). In Year 2, no laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomies occurred, with total laparoscopic or vaginal hysterectomies performed instead. Transvaginal uterus morcellation increased from 13% in Year 1 to 24% in Year 2 (p<0.05). Bilateral salpingectomies increased in Year 2 as well (p<0.05). Among patient factors, estimated blood loss, surgical site infection, total operative time, and hospital length of stay were not significantly different between Years 1 and 2. Body mass index, race/ethnicity, and age did not differ between years. No patients had occult uterine sarcoma.

CONCLUSION

Surgical practice patterns changed for our group of 8 gynecologists in the year after a laparoscopic power morcellator was withdrawn. Though open hysterectomies did not increase, no laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomies were performed. Total laparoscopic and vaginal hysterectomies and bilateral salpingectomies increased, with reliance on transvaginal uterine tissue-removal techniques. Patient outcomes including surgical infections, length of surgery, estimated blood loss and total hospital stay did not change. Our results suggest that experienced vaginal surgeons can adapt to removal of important surgical equipment and continue to provide minimally invasive hysterectomies without compromising patient outcomes and safety.

摘要

目的

本研究是一项质量改进项目,旨在调查子宫切除术的实施模式,包括2014年7月制造商从我们医院撤回腹腔镜动力粉碎器后手术技术的变化和患者预后。

研究设计

本回顾性前后时间序列研究检查了电子健康记录中的数据,将腹腔镜动力粉碎器可用的一年(第1年,2013年年中至2014年年中)与撤回后的一年(第2年,2014年年中至2015年年中)进行比较。数据来自华盛顿州一个与大型综合医疗保健和覆盖提供系统相关的多专科团队中的8名妇科医生的患者。第1年分析了100例患者,第2年分析了133例患者。通过双侧卡方检验分析比较两年中的手术模式和结果。

结果

对于子宫切除途径,第1年和第2年腹部或腹腔镜(包括机器人辅助)手术的百分比没有显著差异。对于微创子宫切除术,第2年经阴道子宫切除术的实施比例(22%)显著高于第1年(14%)(p<0.05)。在第2年,没有进行腹腔镜次全子宫切除术,而是实施了全腹腔镜或经阴道子宫切除术。经阴道子宫粉碎术从第1年的13%增加到第2年的24%(p<0.05)。双侧输卵管切除术在第2年也有所增加(p<0.05)。在患者因素方面,第1年和第2年之间估计失血量、手术部位感染、总手术时间和住院时间没有显著差异。体重指数、种族/民族和年龄在两年间没有差异。没有患者患有隐匿性子宫肉瘤。

结论

在腹腔镜动力粉碎器撤回后的一年里,我们团队的8名妇科医生的手术模式发生了变化。虽然开放性子宫切除术没有增加,但没有进行腹腔镜次全子宫切除术。全腹腔镜和经阴道子宫切除术以及双侧输卵管切除术增加,对经阴道子宫组织切除技术的依赖增加。包括手术感染、手术时长、估计失血量和总住院时间在内的患者预后没有改变。我们的结果表明,经验丰富的阴道外科医生可以适应重要手术设备的移除,并继续提供微创子宫切除术,而不会影响患者的预后和安全。

相似文献

1
Impact of power morcellator removal on hysterectomy practice patterns.电动粉碎器移除对子宫切除术实践模式的影响。
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2017 Aug;215:41-44. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2017.05.015. Epub 2017 May 21.
2
Comparison of Morcellation Techniques at the Time of Laparoscopic Hysterectomy and Myomectomy.腹腔镜子宫切除术和子宫肌瘤切除术时碎解技术的比较
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2017 Jul-Aug;24(5):843-849. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2017.04.023. Epub 2017 May 5.
3
Laparoscopic Hysterectomy Route, Resource Use, and Outcomes: Change After Power Morcellation Warning.腹腔镜子宫切除术的途径、资源利用和结果:电切环(Power Morcellation)警示后的变化。
Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Aug;134(2):227-238. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000003375.
4
Practice patterns and postoperative complications before and after US Food and Drug Administration safety communication on power morcellation.美国食品药品监督管理局发布关于动力粉碎术的安全通讯前后的实践模式及术后并发症
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Jan;214(1):98.e1-98.e13. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.08.047. Epub 2015 Aug 24.
5
Extracorporeal Manual Morcellation of Very Large Uteri Within an Enclosed Endoscopic Bag: Our 5-Year Experience.在封闭的内镜袋内对超大子宫进行体外手动粉碎术:我们的5年经验
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2016 Sep-Oct;23(6):903-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2016.03.016. Epub 2016 Apr 4.
6
Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy in Patients with Large Uteri: Comparison of Uterine Removal by Transvaginal and Uterine Morcellation Approaches.大子宫患者的全腹腔镜子宫切除术:经阴道子宫切除与子宫粉碎术方法的比较
Biomed Res Int. 2016;2016:8784601. doi: 10.1155/2016/8784601. Epub 2016 Jun 22.
7
Minimally Invasive Hysterectomy and Power Morcellation Trends in a West Coast Integrated Health System.西海岸综合医疗系统中的微创子宫切除术和电力碎石术趋势。
Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Jun;129(6):996-1005. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000002034.
8
Complication rate of uterine morcellation in laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy: a retrospective cohort study.腹腔镜次全子宫切除术中子宫粉碎术的并发症发生率:一项回顾性队列研究
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2016 Apr;199:179-82. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2016.02.022. Epub 2016 Feb 21.
9
Practice Patterns and Complications of Benign Hysterectomy Following the FDA Statement Warning Against the Use of Power Morcellation.在 FDA 发布禁止使用电动组织粉碎器的声明后,良性子宫切除术的实践模式和并发症。
JAMA Surg. 2018 Jun 20;153(6):e180141. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2018.0141.
10
Hospital variation in responses to safety warnings about power morcellation in hysterectomy.医院对子宫切除术电切术中安全警告的反应存在差异。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2021 Jun;224(6):589.e1-589.e13. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2020.12.1207. Epub 2020 Dec 24.

引用本文的文献

1
Risk Factors Associated with Perineal and Vaginal Lacerations and Vaginal Removal in Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy.全腹腔镜子宫切除术中与会阴及阴道撕裂伤和阴道切除相关的危险因素
Gynecol Minim Invasive Ther. 2022 Aug 5;11(3):150-154. doi: 10.4103/gmit.gmit_118_21. eCollection 2022 Jul-Sep.
2
Safety Warning about Laparoscopic Power Morcellation in Hysterectomy: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of National Impact.子宫切除术中腹腔镜动力粉碎术的安全警示:一项关于国家影响的成本效益分析
Womens Health Rep (New Rochelle). 2022 Mar 28;3(1):369-384. doi: 10.1089/whr.2021.0101. eCollection 2022.
3
Comparison of Robotic and Laparoscopic Hysterectomy for the Large Uterus.
大型子宫机器人辅助与腹腔镜子宫切除术的比较
JSLS. 2019 Jan-Mar;23(1). doi: 10.4293/JSLS.2018.00068.