Pruksanusak Ninlapa, Thongphanang Putthaporn, Chainarong Natthicha, Suntharasaj Thitima, Kor-Anantakul Ounjai, Suwanrath Chitkasaem, Petpichetchian Chusana
a Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine , Prince of Songkla University , Songkhla , Thailand.
J Obstet Gynaecol. 2017 Nov;37(8):996-999. doi: 10.1080/01443615.2017.1312314. Epub 2017 Jun 9.
A prospective study was conducted in centre in Southern Thailand, to evaluate agreement in EFM interpretation among various physicians in order to find out the most practical system for daily use. We found strong agreement of very normal FHR tracings among the FIGO, NICHD 3-tier and 5-tier systems. The NICHD 3-tier was more compatible with the FIGO system than 5-tier system. Overall inter-observer agreement was moderate for the NICHD 3-tier system while inter-observer agreement of 5-tier system was fair also the intra-observer agreement was higher in the NICHD 3-tier system. So the 3-tier systems are more suitable than the 5-tier system in general obstetric practice. Impact statement What is already known on this subject: The 3-tier and 5-tier systems were widely used in general obstetrics practice. What the results of this study add: The inter- and intra-observer agreement of NICHD 3-tier system was higher than the 5-tier system. What the implications are of these findings for clinical practice and/or further research: The 3-tier systems were more suitable than the 5-tier systems in general obstetrics practice.
在泰国南部的一个中心进行了一项前瞻性研究,以评估不同医生对电子胎儿监护(EFM)解读的一致性,从而找出日常使用中最实用的系统。我们发现,在国际妇产科联盟(FIGO)、美国国立儿童健康与人类发展研究所(NICHD)的3级和5级系统中,对于非常正常的胎心率描记图有很强的一致性。与5级系统相比,NICHD 3级系统与FIGO系统更兼容。对于NICHD 3级系统,观察者间的总体一致性为中等,而5级系统观察者间的一致性为一般,NICHD 3级系统的观察者内一致性也更高。因此,在一般产科实践中,3级系统比5级系统更合适。影响声明关于该主题已有的知识:3级和5级系统在一般产科实践中广泛使用。本研究的结果补充了什么:NICHD 3级系统的观察者间和观察者内一致性高于5级系统。这些发现对临床实践和/或进一步研究有什么影响:在一般产科实践中,3级系统比5级系统更合适。