Lukhele Sanele, Mulaudzi Fhumulani Mavis, Gundo Rodwell
Faculty of Health Sciences, Department of Nursing Sciences, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa.
PLoS One. 2025 Jan 24;20(1):e0315761. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0315761. eCollection 2025.
The reliability of cardiotocographs as diagnostic tools for fetal well-being is hampered by interpretational variations among healthcare professionals, contributing to high rates of cesarean sections and instrumental deliveries. While adjunct technologies may be used to confirm cases of fetal distress, those in resource constrained areas continue to rely on visual cardiotocograph interpretation to come up with the diagnosis of fetal hypoxia. This study investigated the factors contributing to variations in the visual interpretation of intrapartum cardiotocograph among healthcare professionals in the absence of adjunctive technologies. In this integrative literature review, we conducted a literature search of the following electronic databases: EBScohost, PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus. The following search terms and Boolean operators were used: (Intrapartum OR Labor OR Labour OR Childbirth OR Birth OR Delivery) AND (Cardiotocography OR CTG OR "Electronic Fetal Monitoring" OR EFM) AND (Interpretation OR Analysis) AND (Variations OR Differences) AND ("Healthcare Workers" OR Nurses OR "Medical Workers" OR "Healthcare Professionals" OR Midwives OR Obstetricians). After removal of duplicates, a total of 1481 articles and titles were screened, 60 full-text articles were examined to verify whether they addressed the scope of the literature review. Nine articles addressed the factors contributing to variations in the visual interpretation of intrapartum cardiotocographs among healthcare professionals. The quality of the studies was appraised using the Quality Appraisal Tool for Studies of Diagnostic Reliability. Thematic analysis identified the following themes: 1) Interpretational variations in cardiotocograph characteristics among health professionals, and 2) factors leading to increased interpretational variation among healthcare professionals. Our results highlight the need for increased cardiotocograph training to improve consistency among health professionals, especially for suspicious and pathological traces, which often lead to cesarean section.
医护人员之间的解读差异妨碍了胎心监护仪作为评估胎儿健康诊断工具的可靠性,这导致了剖宫产和器械助产率居高不下。虽然可以使用辅助技术来确诊胎儿窘迫病例,但资源受限地区的医护人员仍继续依靠对胎心监护仪的视觉解读来诊断胎儿缺氧。本研究调查了在没有辅助技术的情况下,导致医护人员对产时胎心监护仪视觉解读存在差异的因素。在这项综合文献综述中,我们对以下电子数据库进行了文献检索:EBScohost、PubMed、科学网和Scopus。使用了以下检索词和布尔运算符:(产时或分娩或分娩期或分娩或出生或分娩)与(胎心监护或CTG或“电子胎儿监护”或EFM)与(解读或分析)与(差异或不同)与(“医护人员”或护士或“医务工作者”或“医疗专业人员”或助产士或产科医生)。去除重复项后,共筛选了1481篇文章和标题,检查了60篇全文文章,以核实它们是否涉及文献综述的范围。有9篇文章探讨了导致医护人员对产时胎心监护仪视觉解读存在差异的因素。使用诊断可靠性研究质量评估工具对研究质量进行了评估。主题分析确定了以下主题:1)卫生专业人员对胎心监护仪特征的解读差异,以及2)导致医护人员解读差异增加的因素。我们的结果强调需要加强胎心监护仪培训,以提高卫生专业人员之间的一致性,特别是对于可疑和病理性痕迹,这些往往会导致剖宫产。