• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

社交媒体如何发挥作用:镇压与“占领华尔街”运动的传播

How social media matter: Repression and the diffusion of the Occupy Wall Street movement.

作者信息

Suh Chan S, Vasi Ion Bogdan, Chang Paul Y

机构信息

Boise State University, United States.

University of Iowa, United States.

出版信息

Soc Sci Res. 2017 Jul;65:282-293. doi: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2017.01.004. Epub 2017 Jan 17.

DOI:10.1016/j.ssresearch.2017.01.004
PMID:28599778
Abstract

This study explores the role played by social media in reshaping the repression-mobilization relationship. Drawing on the case of the Occupy Wall Street movement, we examine the impact of Facebook and Twitter on the spatial diffusion of protests during a period of heightened state repression. Results from event history analyses suggest that the effects of repression on protest diffusion are contingent on the presence of social media accounts supporting the movement. We find that state repression at earlier protest sites encouraged activists to create Facebook and Twitter accounts in their own cities, which then served as important vehicles for the initiation of new Occupy protests. Moreover, results suggest that repression incidents can directly facilitate future protests in cities that already have Occupy Facebook accounts. This study highlights the potential of social media to both mediate and moderate the influence of repression on the diffusion of contemporary movements.

摘要

本研究探讨了社交媒体在重塑压制与动员关系中所扮演的角色。以“占领华尔街”运动为例,我们考察了在国家压制加剧时期,脸书和推特对抗议活动空间扩散的影响。事件史分析结果表明,压制对抗议扩散的影响取决于支持该运动的社交媒体账户的存在。我们发现,早期抗议地点的国家压制促使活动人士在自己所在城市创建脸书和推特账户,这些账户随后成为发起新的“占领”抗议活动的重要工具。此外,结果表明,压制事件能够直接推动在已有“占领”脸书账户的城市中未来的抗议活动。本研究凸显了社交媒体在调解和缓和压制对当代运动扩散影响方面的潜力。

相似文献

1
How social media matter: Repression and the diffusion of the Occupy Wall Street movement.社交媒体如何发挥作用:镇压与“占领华尔街”运动的传播
Soc Sci Res. 2017 Jul;65:282-293. doi: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2017.01.004. Epub 2017 Jan 17.
2
Direct Participation in and Indirect Exposure to the Occupy Central Movement and Depressive Symptoms: A Longitudinal Study of Hong Kong Adults.直接参与和间接接触“占中”运动与抑郁症状:一项针对香港成年人的纵向研究
Am J Epidemiol. 2016 Nov 1;184(9):636-643. doi: 10.1093/aje/kww103. Epub 2016 Oct 19.
3
Social Media Participation in an Activist Movement for Racial Equality.社交媒体在种族平等激进主义运动中的参与情况。
Proc Int AAAI Conf Weblogs Soc Media. 2016 May;2016:92-101.
4
Time-dependent association between mass protests and psychological distress on social media: A text mining study during the 2019 anti-government social unrest in Hong Kong.时间依赖性关联研究:社交媒体上的大规模抗议活动与心理困扰之间的关系——以 2019 年香港反政府社会动荡期间为例
J Affect Disord. 2021 Aug 1;291:177-187. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2021.05.007. Epub 2021 May 15.
5
Occupy the government: Analyzing presidential and congressional discursive response to movement repression.占领政府:分析总统和国会对运动镇压的话语回应。
Soc Sci Res. 2017 Sep;67:91-114. doi: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2017.07.001. Epub 2017 Jul 13.
6
The rules of engagement: comparing two social protest movements on YouTube.参与规则:比较YouTube上的两场社会抗议运动。
Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2014 Mar;17(3):133-40. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2013.0117. Epub 2013 Oct 10.
7
Pricing a Protest: Forecasting the Dynamics of Civil Unrest Activity in Social Media.为抗议定价:预测社交媒体上民众骚乱活动的动态
PLoS One. 2015 Oct 6;10(10):e0139911. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0139911. eCollection 2015.
8
The digital evolution of occupy wall street.占领华尔街运动的数字化演变。
PLoS One. 2013 May 29;8(5):e64679. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0064679. Print 2013.
9
Killing the bill online? Pathways to young people's protest engagement via social media.在线扼杀法案?社交媒体中青年抗议参与的途径。
Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2012 Nov;15(11):579-84. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2012.0153. Epub 2012 Sep 24.
10
Analyzing protest mobilization on Telegram: The case of 2019 Anti-Extradition Bill movement in Hong Kong.分析电报上的抗议动员情况:以 2019 年香港反引渡法案运动为例。
PLoS One. 2021 Oct 8;16(10):e0256675. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0256675. eCollection 2021.

引用本文的文献

1
Mobilizing grievances in the internet age: The case of national online petitioning in South Korea, 2017-2022.在互联网时代调动不满:2017-2022 年韩国全国网上请愿的案例。
PLoS One. 2024 May 16;19(5):e0302373. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0302373. eCollection 2024.
2
The buffering effect of social capital for daily mental stress in an unequal society: a lesson from Seoul.在一个不平等的社会中,社会资本对日常精神压力的缓冲作用:来自首尔的教训。
Int J Equity Health. 2023 Apr 10;22(1):64. doi: 10.1186/s12939-023-01875-w.
3
In sight, in mind: Spatial proximity to protest sites and changes in peoples' political attitudes.
眼见为实:与抗议地点的空间接近度与人们政治态度的变化。
Br J Sociol. 2023 Jan;74(1):83-104. doi: 10.1111/1468-4446.12988. Epub 2023 Jan 11.
4
Finding uncommon ground: Extremist online forum engagement predicts integrative complexity.寻找共同点:极端主义在线论坛参与度预测整合复杂性。
PLoS One. 2021 Jan 19;16(1):e0245651. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0245651. eCollection 2021.
5
Managing Cross-Border Conflicts Through Volunteer Commitment: A Comparative Study Between Religious and Non-profit Organizations in the San Diego-Tijuana Area.通过志愿者奉献管理跨境冲突:圣地亚哥 - 蒂华纳地区宗教组织与非营利组织的比较研究
Front Psychol. 2020 Jan 28;10:2978. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02978. eCollection 2019.