Giordano Davide, Frasoldati Andrea, Gabrielli Enrico, Pernice Carmine, Zini Michele, Castellucci Andrea, Piana Simonetta, Ciarrocchi Alessia, Cavuto Silvio, Barbieri Verter
Otolaryngology Unit, Arcispedale Santa Maria Nuova - IRCCS, Reggio Emilia, Italy.
Endocrinology Unit, Arcispedale Santa Maria Nuova - IRCCS, Reggio Emilia, Italy.
Am J Otolaryngol. 2017 Sep-Oct;38(5):576-581. doi: 10.1016/j.amjoto.2017.06.004. Epub 2017 Jun 14.
The risk-benefit ratio of central neck dissection (CND) in patients affected by papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC) without clinical or ultrasonographic (US) evidence of neck lymph node metastasis (cN0) is currently debated. The aim of this study was to evaluate long-term outcome of CND on locoregional recurrence, distant metastasis, survival, and postoperative complications in a large series of patients with cN0-PTC.
Observational retrospective controlled study.
Clinical records of patients (n=610) surgically treated for cN0-PTC at the Otolaryngology Unit of the Arcispedale Santa Maria Nuova-IRCCS, Reggio Emilia, Italy, from January 1984 to December 2008, were retrospectively reviewed. Study population was divided into three groups according to surgical treatment: Group A, total thyroidectomy (n=205); Group B, total thyroidectomy and elective ipsilateral CND (n=281); Group C, total thyroidectomy and bilateral CND (n=124).
Of a total of 610 patients, 305 (50%) were classified as low-risk, 278 (45.57%) as intermediate-risk, and 27 (4.43%) as high-risk. Response to initial therapy was excellent in 567 patients (92.95%), acceptable in 21 (3.44%), and incomplete in 22 (3.61%), with no significant differences among groups. Locoregional recurrence was detected in 32 (5.2%) out of 610 patients. Distant metastasis was found in 15 patients (2.5%). Statistical analysis showed no significant differences in the rates of locoregional recurrence (p=0.890) or distant metastasis (p=0.538) among groups. Disease-specific mortality and overall survival did not significantly differ among groups (p=0.248 and 0.223, respectively). Rate of permanent hypoparathyroidism was significantly higher in Group C patients compared to those in Groups A and B.
CND does not confer any clear advantage in the treatment of low-risk patients, regardless of surgical procedure. Instead, bilateral CND may be effective in limiting disease relapse and/or progression in patients at higher prognostic risk. Our data indicate that elective CND does not confer any clear advantage in terms of locoregional recurrence and long-term survival, as demonstrated by outcomes of the study Groups, regardless of their different prognostic risk. Elective CND allows a more accurate pathologic staging of central neck lymph nodes, despite its increasing the risk of permanent hypoparathyroidism. Intraoperative pathologic staging is a valuable tool to assess the risk of controlateral lymph node metastasis in the central neck compartment and to limit more aggressive surgery only to cases, otherwise understaged, with lymph node metastasis.
目前,对于无颈部淋巴结转移临床或超声(US)证据(cN0)的甲状腺乳头状癌(PTC)患者,中央区颈淋巴结清扫术(CND)的风险效益比存在争议。本研究的目的是评估大量cN0-PTC患者接受CND后的局部区域复发、远处转移、生存及术后并发症的长期结局。
观察性回顾性对照研究。
回顾性分析1984年1月至2008年12月在意大利雷焦艾米利亚圣玛丽亚诺瓦综合医院耳鼻喉科接受手术治疗的cN0-PTC患者(n = 610)的临床记录。根据手术治疗方式将研究人群分为三组:A组,全甲状腺切除术(n = 205);B组,全甲状腺切除术加选择性同侧CND(n = 281);C组,全甲状腺切除术加双侧CND(n = 124)。
610例患者中,305例(50%)为低风险,278例(45.57%)为中风险,27例(4.43%)为高风险。567例患者(92.95%)对初始治疗反应良好,21例(3.44%)可接受,22例(3.61%)不完全,各组间无显著差异。610例患者中有32例(5.2%)检测到局部区域复发。15例患者(2.5%)发现远处转移。统计分析显示,各组间局部区域复发率(p = 0.890)或远处转移率(p = 0.538)无显著差异。疾病特异性死亡率和总生存率在各组间无显著差异(分别为p = 0.248和0.223)。C组患者永久性甲状旁腺功能减退的发生率显著高于A组和B组患者。
无论手术方式如何,CND在低风险患者的治疗中未显示出明显优势。相反,双侧CND可能对限制预后较高风险患者的疾病复发和/或进展有效。我们的数据表明,选择性CND在局部区域复发和长期生存方面未显示出明显优势,如研究组的结果所示,无论其不同的预后风险如何。选择性CND可使中央区颈淋巴结的病理分期更准确,尽管其增加了永久性甲状旁腺功能减退的风险。术中病理分期是评估中央区颈淋巴结转移风险并仅对那些否则分期不足且有淋巴结转移的病例限制更积极手术的有价值工具。