Suppr超能文献

前瞻性记忆与衰老:有精确但不相关线索时,自发提取能力保持不变的证据。

Prospective memory and aging: evidence for preserved spontaneous retrieval with exact but not related cues.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Furman University.

出版信息

Psychol Aging. 2013 Dec;28(4):910-22. doi: 10.1037/a0034347.

Abstract

We examined whether normal aging spares or compromises cue-driven spontaneous retrieval processes that support prospective remembering. In Experiment 1, young and older adults performed prospective-memory tasks that required either strategic monitoring processes for retrieval (nonfocal) or for which participants relied on spontaneous retrieval processes (focal). We found age differences for nonfocal, but not focal, prospective-memory performance. Experiments 2 and 3 used an intention-interference paradigm in which participants were asked to perform a prospective-memory task (e.g., press "Q" when the word money appears) in the context of an image-rating task and were then told to suspend their prospective-memory intention until after completing an intervening lexical-decision task. During the lexical-decision task, we presented the exact prospective-memory cue (e.g., money; Experiments 2 and 3) or a semantically related lure (e.g., wallet; Experiment 3), and we inferred spontaneous retrieval from slowed lexical-decision responses to these items relative to matched control items. Young and older adults showed significant slowing when the exact prospective-memory cue was presented. Only young adults, however, showed significant slowing to the semantically related lure items. Collectively, these results partially support the multiprocess theory prediction that aging spares spontaneous retrieval processes. Spontaneous retrieval processes may become less sensitive with aging, such that older adults are less likely to respond to cues that do not exactly match their encoded targets.

摘要

我们研究了正常衰老是否会影响或损害支持前瞻性记忆的线索驱动的自发检索过程。在实验 1 中,年轻和老年成年人执行了前瞻性记忆任务,这些任务需要检索的策略监控过程(非焦点)或参与者依赖自发检索过程(焦点)。我们发现非焦点前瞻性记忆表现存在年龄差异,但焦点前瞻性记忆表现则没有。实验 2 和 3 使用了意图干扰范式,参与者被要求在图像评分任务的背景下执行前瞻性记忆任务(例如,当出现“钱”这个词时按“Q”键),然后被告知在完成干预性词汇决策任务之前暂停他们的前瞻性记忆意图。在词汇决策任务中,我们呈现了确切的前瞻性记忆线索(例如,钱;实验 2 和 3)或语义相关的诱饵(例如,钱包;实验 3),我们推断出这些项目相对于匹配的控制项目的自发检索是通过对这些项目的词汇决策反应较慢得出的。年轻和老年成年人在呈现确切的前瞻性记忆线索时表现出明显的减速。然而,只有年轻成年人对语义相关的诱饵项目表现出明显的减速。总的来说,这些结果部分支持多过程理论的预测,即衰老会使自发检索过程得到保护。自发检索过程可能随着年龄的增长而变得不那么敏感,因此老年人不太可能对与他们编码的目标不完全匹配的线索做出反应。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验