Suppr超能文献

THP-1细胞和人外周血单核细胞来源的巨噬细胞在体外极化能力上存在差异。

THP-1 and human peripheral blood mononuclear cell-derived macrophages differ in their capacity to polarize in vitro.

作者信息

Shiratori Hiromi, Feinweber Carmen, Luckhardt Sonja, Linke Bona, Resch Eduard, Geisslinger Gerd, Weigert Andreas, Parnham Michael J

机构信息

Fraunhofer Institute for Molecular Biology and Applied Ecology IME, Project Group Translational Medicine and Pharmacology TMP, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60596 Frankfurt am Main, Germany.

Institute of Clinical Pharmacology, Goethe University, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60590 Frankfurt am Main, Germany.

出版信息

Mol Immunol. 2017 Aug;88:58-68. doi: 10.1016/j.molimm.2017.05.027. Epub 2017 Jun 7.

Abstract

Macrophages (Mφ) undergo activation to pro-inflammatory (M1) or anti-inflammatory (M2) phenotypes in response to pathophysiologic stimuli and dysregulation of the M1-M2 balance is often associated with diseases. Therefore, studying mechanisms of macrophage polarization may reveal new drug targets. Human Mφ polarization is generally studied in primary monocyte-derived Mφ (PBMC Mφ) and THP-1-derived Mφ (THP-1 Mφ). We compared the polarization profile of THP-1 Mφ with that of PBMC Mφ to assess the alternative use of THP-1 for polarization studies. Cellular morphology, the expression profiles of 18 genes and 4 cell surface proteins, and phagocytosis capacity for apoptotic cells and S. aureus bioparticles were compared between these Mφ, activated towards M1, M2a, or M2c subsets by stimulation with LPS/IFNγ, IL-4, or IL-10, respectively, for 6h, 24h and 48h. The Mφ types are unique in morphology and basal expression of polarization marker genes, particularly CCL22, in a pre-polarized state, and were differentially sensitive to polarization stimuli. Generally, M1 markers were instantly induced and gradually decreased, while M2 markers were markedly expressed at a later time. Expression profiles of M1 markers were similar between the polarized Mφ types, but M2a cell surface markers demonstrated an IL-4-dependent upregulation only in PBMC Mφ. Polarized THP-1 Mφ but not PBMC Mφ showed distinctive phagocytic capacity for apoptotic cells and bacterial antigens, respectively. In conclusion, our data suggest that THP-1 may be useful for performing studies involving phagocytosis and M1 polarization, rather than M2 polarization.

摘要

巨噬细胞(Mφ)会响应病理生理刺激而被激活为促炎(M1)或抗炎(M2)表型,M1-M2平衡的失调通常与疾病相关。因此,研究巨噬细胞极化机制可能会揭示新的药物靶点。人类Mφ极化通常在原代单核细胞衍生的Mφ(PBMC Mφ)和THP-1衍生的Mφ(THP-1 Mφ)中进行研究。我们比较了THP-1 Mφ与PBMC Mφ的极化特征,以评估THP-1在极化研究中的替代用途。分别用LPS/IFNγ、IL-4或IL-10刺激这些Mφ 6小时、24小时和48小时,使其向M1、M2a或M2c亚群激活,然后比较这些Mφ的细胞形态、18个基因和4种细胞表面蛋白的表达谱,以及对凋亡细胞和金黄色葡萄球菌生物颗粒的吞噬能力。这些Mφ类型在形态和极化标记基因的基础表达上具有独特性,尤其是在预极化状态下的CCL22,并且对极化刺激的敏感性不同。一般来说,M1标记物会立即被诱导并逐渐减少,而M2标记物在较晚时间才会显著表达。极化的Mφ类型之间M1标记物的表达谱相似,但M2a细胞表面标记物仅在PBMC Mφ中表现出IL-4依赖性上调。极化的THP-1 Mφ对凋亡细胞具有独特的吞噬能力,而PBMC Mφ对细菌抗原具有独特的吞噬能力。总之,我们的数据表明,THP-1可能有助于进行涉及吞噬作用和M1极化而非M2极化的研究。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验