Suppr超能文献

大气气溶胶中无水糖和生物糖定量分析方法的实验室间比较结果。

Results of an interlaboratory comparison of analytical methods for quantification of anhydrosugars and biosugars in atmospheric aerosol.

机构信息

Department of Chemical and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Ferrara, Via Fossato di Mortara 17/19, 44121 Ferrara, Italy.

Department of Environmental Sciences, Informatics & Statistics, University Ca' Foscari of Venice, Via Torino 155, 30170 Venice Mestre, Italy.

出版信息

Chemosphere. 2017 Oct;184:269-277. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.05.131. Epub 2017 May 26.

Abstract

An interlaboratory comparison was performed to evaluate the analytical methods for quantification of anhydrosugars - levoglucosan, mannosan, galactosan - and biosugars - arabitol, glucose and mannitol - in atmospheric aerosol. The performance of 10 laboratories in Italy currently involved in such analyses was investigated on twenty-six PM (particulate matter) ambient filters, three synthetic PM filters and three aqueous standard solutions. An acceptable interlaboratory variability was found, determined as the mean relative standard deviation (RSD%) of the results from the participating laboratories, with the mean RSD% values ranging from 25% to 46% and decreasing with increasing sugar concentration. The investigated methods show good accuracy, evaluated as the percentage error (ε%) related to mean values, since method biases ranged within ±20% for most of the analytes measured in the different laboratories. The detailed investigation (ANOVA analysis at p < 0.05) of the contribution of each laboratory to the total variability and the measurement accuracy shows that comparable results are generated by the different methods, despite the great diversity in terms of extraction conditions, chromatographic separation - more recent LC (liquid chromatography) and EC (exchange chromatography) methods compared to more widespread GC (gas chromatography) - and detection systems, namely PAD (pulsed amperometric detection) or mass spectrometry.

摘要

进行了实验室间比对,以评估定量分析大气气溶胶中无水糖(左旋葡聚糖、甘露聚糖、半乳糖聚糖)和生物糖(阿拉伯糖醇、葡萄糖和甘露醇)的分析方法。研究了意大利目前参与此类分析的 10 个实验室在 26 个 PM(颗粒物)环境滤膜、3 个合成 PM 滤膜和 3 个水溶液标准溶液上的表现。发现实验室间具有可接受的变异性,用参与实验室的结果的平均相对标准偏差(RSD%)来确定,平均 RSD%值范围为 25%至 46%,并随糖浓度的增加而降低。所研究的方法显示出良好的准确性,用与平均值的百分比误差(ε%)来评估,因为在不同实验室测量的大多数分析物的方法偏差都在±20%以内。对每个实验室对总变异性和测量精度的贡献的详细研究(ANOVA 分析,p < 0.05)表明,尽管在提取条件、色谱分离(与更广泛使用的 GC(气相色谱)相比,最近的 LC(液相色谱)和 EC(交换色谱)方法)和检测系统(即 PAD(脉冲安培检测)或质谱)方面存在很大差异,但不同的方法可产生可比的结果。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验