• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

钝性创伤性失血性休克中的年龄相关死亡率:致死因素与挽救生命的因素

Age-related mortality in blunt traumatic hemorrhagic shock: the killers and the life savers.

作者信息

Hwabejire John O, Nembhard Christine E, Oyetunji Tolulope A, Seyoum Theodros, Abiodun Mayowa P, Siram Suryanarayana M, Cornwell Edward E, Greene Wendy R

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Howard University College of Medicine and Howard University Hospital, Washington, District of Columbia.

Department of Surgery, Children's Mercy Hospitals and Clinics, Kansas City, Missouri.

出版信息

J Surg Res. 2017 Jun 1;213:199-206. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2015.04.056. Epub 2015 Apr 23.

DOI:10.1016/j.jss.2015.04.056
PMID:28601315
Abstract

BACKGROUND

There are sparse data on the association between age and mortality in hemorrhagic shock (HS). We examined this association in this study.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The Glue Grant database was analyzed. Patients aged ≥16 y with blunt traumatic HS were stratified into eight age groups (16-24, 25-34, 35-44, 45-54, 55-64, 65-74, 75-84, and ≥85 y) to identify the mortality inflection point. Subsequently, patients were restratified into young age (16-44 y), middle age (45-64 y), and elderly (≥65 y). Multivariate analysis was used to determine predictors of mortality by group.

RESULTS

A total of 1976 patients were included, with mortality of 16%. Mortality by initial age group is as follows: 16-24 (13.0%), 25-34 (11.9%), 35-44 (11.9%), 45-54 (15.6%), 55-64 (15.7%), 65-74 (20.3%), 75-84 (38.2%), and ≥85 y (51.6%), delineating 65 y as the mortality inflection point. Overall, 55% were young, 30% middle age, and 15% elderly. Predictors of mortality in the young include multiple-organ dysfunction score (MODS; odds ratio [OR]: 1.93, confidence interval [CI]: 1.62-2.30), emergency room lactate (OR: 1.14, CI: 1.02-1.27), injury severity score (OR: 1.06, CI: 1.03-1.09), and cardiac arrest (OR: 10.60, CI: 3.05-36.86). Predictors of mortality in the middle age include MODS (OR: 1.38, CI: 1.24-1.53), cardiac arrest (OR: 12.24, CI: 5.38-27.81), craniotomy (OR: 5.62, CI: 1.93-16.37), and thoracotomy (OR: 2.76, CI: 1.28-5.98). In the elderly, predictors of mortality were age (OR: 1.07, CI: 1.02-1.13), MODS (OR: 1.47, CI: 1.26-1.72), laparotomy (OR: 2.04, CI: 1.02-4.08), and cardiac arrest (OR: 11.61, CI: 4.35-30.98). Open fixation of nonfemoral fractures was protective against mortality in all age groups.

CONCLUSIONS

In blunt HS, mortality parallels increasing age, with the inflection point at 65 y. MODS and cardiac arrest uniformly predict mortality across all age groups. Craniotomy and thoracotomy are associated with mortality in the middle age, whereas laparotomy is associated with mortality in the elderly.

摘要

背景

关于出血性休克(HS)患者年龄与死亡率之间的关联,相关数据较少。我们在本研究中对这种关联进行了调查。

材料与方法

分析Glue Grant数据库。将年龄≥16岁的钝性创伤性HS患者分为8个年龄组(16 - 24岁、25 - 34岁、35 - 44岁、45 - 54岁、55 - 64岁、65 - 74岁、75 - 84岁和≥85岁),以确定死亡率拐点。随后,将患者重新分为青年组(16 - 44岁)、中年组(45 - 64岁)和老年组(≥65岁)。采用多因素分析确定各年龄组的死亡预测因素。

结果

共纳入1976例患者,死亡率为16%。各初始年龄组的死亡率如下:16 - 24岁(13.0%)、25 - 34岁(11.9%)、35 - 44岁(11.9%)、45 - 54岁(15.6%)、55 - 64岁(15.7%)、65 - 74岁(20.3%)、75 - 84岁(38.2%)和≥85岁(51.6%),确定65岁为死亡率拐点。总体而言,青年组占55%,中年组占30%,老年组占15%。青年组的死亡预测因素包括多器官功能障碍评分(MODS;比值比[OR]:1.93,置信区间[CI]:1.62 - 2.30)、急诊室乳酸水平(OR:1.14,CI:1.02 - 1.27)、损伤严重程度评分(OR:1.06,CI:1.03 - 1.09)和心脏骤停(OR:10.60,CI:3.05 - 36.86)。中年组的死亡预测因素包括MODS(OR:1.38,CI:1.24 - 1.53)、心脏骤停(OR:12.24,CI:5.38 - 27.81)、开颅手术(OR:5.62,CI:1.93 - 16.37)和开胸手术(OR:2.76,CI:1.28 - 5.98)。老年组的死亡预测因素为年龄(OR:1.07,CI:1.02 - 1.13)、MODS(OR:1.47,CI:1.26 - 1.72)、剖腹手术(OR:2.04,CI:1.02 - 4.08)和心脏骤停(OR:11.61,CI:4.35 - 30.98)。非股骨骨折的切开复位内固定术对所有年龄组的死亡率均有保护作用。

结论

在钝性HS中,死亡率随年龄增长而升高,拐点为65岁。MODS和心脏骤停在所有年龄组中均为死亡的一致预测因素。开颅手术和开胸手术与中年组死亡率相关,而剖腹手术与老年组死亡率相关。

相似文献

1
Age-related mortality in blunt traumatic hemorrhagic shock: the killers and the life savers.钝性创伤性失血性休克中的年龄相关死亡率:致死因素与挽救生命的因素
J Surg Res. 2017 Jun 1;213:199-206. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2015.04.056. Epub 2015 Apr 23.
2
A comparison of initial lactate and initial base deficit as predictors of mortality after severe blunt trauma.比较初始乳酸水平和初始碱缺失作为严重钝性创伤后死亡率预测指标的研究。
J Surg Res. 2016 Oct;205(2):446-455. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2016.06.103. Epub 2016 Jul 5.
3
Female sex protects from organ failure and sepsis after major trauma haemorrhage.女性性别可预防严重创伤出血后的器官衰竭和脓毒症。
Injury. 2014 Oct;45 Suppl 3:S20-8. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2014.08.013.
4
Use of Vasopressor Increases the Risk of Mortality in Traumatic Hemorrhagic Shock: A Nationwide Cohort Study in Japan.血管加压素的使用会增加创伤性失血性休克患者的死亡率:日本全国队列研究。
Crit Care Med. 2018 Dec;46(12):e1145-e1151. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000003428.
5
Management of cirrhotic patients with blunt abdominal trauma: analysis of risk factor of postoperative death with the Model for End-Stage Liver Disease score.肝硬化合并钝性腹部创伤患者的管理:终末期肝病模型评分分析术后死亡的危险因素。
Injury. 2012 Sep;43(9):1457-61. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2011.03.057. Epub 2011 Apr 20.
6
The use of the Revised Trauma Score as an entry criterion in traumatic hemorrhagic shock studies: data from the DCLHb clinical trials.修订创伤评分作为创伤性出血性休克研究的纳入标准的应用:来自 DCLHb 临床试验的数据。
Prehosp Disaster Med. 2012 Aug;27(4):330-44. doi: 10.1017/S1049023X12000970. Epub 2012 Jul 30.
7
Abdominal compartment syndrome in traumatic hemorrhagic shock: is there a fluid resuscitation inflection point associated with increased risk?创伤性失血性休克中的腹腔间隔室综合征:是否存在与风险增加相关的液体复苏转折点?
Am J Surg. 2016 Apr;211(4):733-8. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2015.09.019. Epub 2015 Dec 31.
8
Body mass index in blunt trauma patients with hemorrhagic shock: opposite ends of the body mass index spectrum portend poor outcome.钝性创伤性失血性休克患者的体重指数:体重指数范围两端提示预后不良。
Am J Surg. 2015 Apr;209(4):659-65. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2014.12.016. Epub 2015 Jan 14.
9
Can the "golden hour of shock" safely be extended in blunt polytrauma patients? Prospective cohort study at a level I hospital in eastern Switzerland.钝性多发伤患者的“休克黄金一小时”能否安全延长?瑞士东部一家一级医院的前瞻性队列研究。
Prehosp Disaster Med. 2002 Apr-Jun;17(2):75-80. doi: 10.1017/s1049023x00000212.
10
Debunking the survival bias myth: characterization of mortality during the initial 24 hours for patients requiring massive transfusion.破除生存偏差的神话:需要大量输血的患者最初 24 小时内死亡率的特征。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2012 Aug;73(2):358-64; discussion 364. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e31825889ba.

引用本文的文献

1
A bibliometric analysis of publications on trauma-related hemorrhagic shock from 2012 to 2022: Research landscape and future trends.2012 年至 2022 年创伤相关失血性休克出版物的文献计量分析:研究现状与未来趋势。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2023 May 19;102(20):e33814. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000033814.
2
Association between the plasma-to-red blood cell ratio and survival in geriatric and non-geriatric trauma patients undergoing massive transfusion: a retrospective cohort study.大量输血的老年和非老年创伤患者血浆与红细胞比例与生存之间的关联:一项回顾性队列研究。
J Intensive Care. 2022 Jan 11;10(1):2. doi: 10.1186/s40560-022-00595-7.
3
Olfactomedin 4-Positive Neutrophils Are Upregulated after Hemorrhagic Shock.
嗅鞘蛋白 4 阳性中性粒细胞在失血性休克后上调。
Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol. 2021 Feb;64(2):216-223. doi: 10.1165/rcmb.2020-0276OC.
4
The Prognostic Value of Troponin in Pediatric Polytrauma.肌钙蛋白在儿童多发伤中的预后价值
Front Pediatr. 2019 Nov 20;7:477. doi: 10.3389/fped.2019.00477. eCollection 2019.
5
Incidences and factors associated with perioperative cardiac arrest in trauma patients receiving anesthesia.接受麻醉的创伤患者围手术期心脏骤停的发生率及相关因素。
Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2018 Oct 18;11:177-187. doi: 10.2147/RMHP.S178950. eCollection 2018.
6
Physical and nutrition statuses of geriatric patients after trauma-related hospitalization: Data from the Korean National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2013-2015.创伤相关住院后老年患者的身体和营养状况:来自2013 - 2015年韩国国家健康与营养检查调查的数据。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Mar;97(9):e0034. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000010034.
7
Risk factors for death in septic shock: A retrospective cohort study comparing trauma and non-trauma patients.感染性休克患者死亡的危险因素:一项比较创伤患者与非创伤患者的回顾性队列研究。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2017 Dec;96(50):e9241. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000009241.