Gale Stephen C, Kocik Jurek F, Creath Robert, Crystal Jessica S, Dombrovskiy Viktor Y
Department of Surgery, Trauma Services, East Texas Medical Center, Tyler, Texas.
Department of Surgery, Trauma Services, East Texas Medical Center, Tyler, Texas.
J Surg Res. 2016 Oct;205(2):446-455. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2016.06.103. Epub 2016 Jul 5.
After injury, base deficit (BD) and lactate are common measures of shock. Lactate directly measures anaerobic byproducts, whereas BD is calculated and multifactorial. Although recent studies suggest superiority for lactate in predicting mortality, most were small or analyzed populations with heterogeneous injury severity. Our objective was to compare initial BD with lactate as predictors of inhospital mortality in a large cohort of blunt trauma patients all presenting with hemorrhagic shock.
The Glue Grant multicenter prospective cohort database was queried; demographic, injury, and physiologic parameters were compiled. Survivors, early deaths (≤24 h), and late deaths were compared. Profound shock (lactate ≥ 4 mmol/L) and severe traumatic brain injury subgroups were identified a priori. Chi-square, t-test, and analysis of variance were used as appropriate for analysis. Multivariable logistic regression and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve analysis assessed survival predictors. P < 0.05 was significant.
A total of 1829 patients met inclusion; 289 (15.8%) died. Both BD and lactate were higher for nonsurvivors (P < 0.00001). After multivariable regression, both lactate (odds ratio [OR] 1.17; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.12-1.23; P < 0.00001) and BD (OR 1.04; 95% CI: 1.01-1.07; P < 0.005) predicted overall mortality. However, when excluding early deaths (n = 77), only lactate (OR 1.12 95% CI: 1.06-1.19; P < 0.0001) remained predictive but not BD (OR 1.00 95% CI: 0.97-1.04; P = 0.89). For the shock subgroup, (n = 915), results were similar with lactate, but not BD, predicting both early and late deaths. Findings also appear independent of traumatic brain injury severity.
After severe blunt trauma, initial lactate better predicts inhospital mortality than initial BD. Initial BD does not predict mortality for patients who survive >24 h.
受伤后,碱缺失(BD)和乳酸是休克的常见指标。乳酸直接测量无氧代谢产物,而BD是计算得出的,且受多种因素影响。尽管最近的研究表明乳酸在预测死亡率方面更具优势,但大多数研究规模较小或分析的是损伤严重程度各异的人群。我们的目的是比较初始BD和乳酸作为一大群均表现为失血性休克的钝性创伤患者院内死亡率预测指标的情况。
查询了胶水基金多中心前瞻性队列数据库;收集了人口统计学、损伤和生理参数。对幸存者、早期死亡(≤24小时)和晚期死亡情况进行了比较。预先确定了严重休克(乳酸≥4 mmol/L)和重度创伤性脑损伤亚组。根据情况适当使用卡方检验、t检验和方差分析进行分析。多变量逻辑回归和受试者工作特征曲线下面积分析评估生存预测指标。P < 0.05具有显著性。
共有1829例患者符合纳入标准;289例(15.8%)死亡。非幸存者的BD和乳酸水平均更高(P < 0.00001)。多变量回归后,乳酸(比值比[OR] 1.17;95%置信区间[CI]:1.12 - 1.23;P < 0.00001)和BD(OR 1.04;95% CI:1.01 - 1.07;P < 0.005)均能预测总体死亡率。然而,排除早期死亡患者(n = 77)后,只有乳酸(OR 1.12,95% CI:1.06 - 1.19;P < 0.0001)仍具有预测性,而BD不具有(OR 1.00,95% CI:0.97 - 1.04;P = 0.89)。对于休克亚组(n = 915),结果类似,乳酸能预测早期和晚期死亡,而BD不能。研究结果似乎也与创伤性脑损伤的严重程度无关。
严重钝性创伤后,初始乳酸比初始BD能更好地预测院内死亡率。初始BD不能预测存活超过24小时患者的死亡率。