• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

急诊科医生、外科住院医师和创伤外科医生对钝性创伤的CT成像差异。

Variability in CT imaging of blunt trauma among ED physicians, surgical residents, and trauma surgeons.

作者信息

James Melissa K, Lee Shi-Wen, Minneman Jennifer A, Moore Maureen D, Klein Taylor R, Robitsek R Jonathan, Barie Phillip S, Schubl Sebastian D

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Jamaica Hospital Medical Center, Jamaica, New York.

Department of Emergency Medicine, Jamaica Hospital Medical Center, Jamaica, New York.

出版信息

J Surg Res. 2017 Jun 1;213:6-15. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2017.02.015. Epub 2017 Feb 24.

DOI:10.1016/j.jss.2017.02.015
PMID:28601333
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Trauma triage decisions can be influenced by both knowledge and experience. Consequently, there may be substantial variability in computed tomography (CT) scans desired by emergency medicine physicians, surgical chief residents, and attending trauma surgeons. We quantified this difference and studied the effects of each group's decisions on missed injuries, cost, and radiation exposure.

METHODS

All blunt trauma activations at an urban level 1 trauma center were studied over a 6-mo period. Three months into the study, a pan-scan protocol was introduced. Prior to CT imaging, providers separately completed a survey that asked which CT scans were desired for each patient. Based on the completed surveys, hypothetical missed injuries, radiation exposure, and cost were determined.

RESULTS

The variability in the number of CT scans desired by each of the three providers and the resulting cost and radiation exposure were not statistically significant. Substantial variability was predominantly seen in the indications for the desired scans, with the difference between proportions ranging from 3.1%-68.7%. Agreement among the three providers was highest for head and c-spine scans (80%-100%) and lowest for maxillary face (57%-80%) and chest scans (52%-74%). Overall, the missed injury rate was similar for all the providers; chief residents missed significantly more major injuries than trauma attendings during the pan-scan period (P = 0.03).

CONCLUSIONS

Trauma training and level of training did not have a substantial effect on radiological decisions during the initial trauma assessment. This study sheds light on the growing uniformity among providers with regard to medical decision-making in the initial work-up of trauma.

摘要

背景

创伤分诊决策可能受到知识和经验的影响。因此,急诊医学医生、外科住院总医师和创伤外科主治医生所要求的计算机断层扫描(CT)检查可能存在很大差异。我们对这种差异进行了量化,并研究了每组决策对漏诊损伤、成本和辐射暴露的影响。

方法

对一家城市一级创伤中心6个月内所有钝性创伤激活病例进行研究。研究进行3个月后,引入了全扫描方案。在进行CT成像之前,医护人员分别完成一项调查,询问对每位患者需要进行哪些CT扫描。根据完成的调查,确定假设的漏诊损伤、辐射暴露和成本。

结果

三位医护人员各自要求的CT扫描数量的差异以及由此产生的成本和辐射暴露在统计学上无显著意义。在所需扫描的指征方面主要存在很大差异,比例差异范围为3.1%-68.7%。三位医护人员对头颈部和颈椎扫描的一致性最高(80%-100%),对上颌面部(57%-80%)和胸部扫描的一致性最低(52%-74%)。总体而言,所有医护人员的漏诊损伤率相似;在全扫描期间,住院总医师漏诊的重伤明显多于创伤主治医生(P = 0.03)。

结论

创伤培训和培训水平在初始创伤评估期间对放射学决策没有实质性影响。这项研究揭示了在创伤初步检查的医疗决策方面,医护人员之间的一致性正在不断提高。

相似文献

1
Variability in CT imaging of blunt trauma among ED physicians, surgical residents, and trauma surgeons.急诊科医生、外科住院医师和创伤外科医生对钝性创伤的CT成像差异。
J Surg Res. 2017 Jun 1;213:6-15. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2017.02.015. Epub 2017 Feb 24.
2
Is the use of pan-computed tomography for blunt trauma justified? A prospective evaluation.对于钝性创伤使用全计算机断层扫描是否合理?一项前瞻性评估。
J Trauma. 2009 Oct;67(4):779-87. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3181b5f2eb.
3
Trauma surgeon utilization of computerized tomography scanning: Room for improvement?创伤外科医生对计算机断层扫描的使用:有改进空间吗?
Am J Surg. 2017 Mar;213(3):579-582. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2016.11.040. Epub 2016 Nov 28.
4
Trends in utilization of whole-body computed tomography in blunt trauma after MVC: Analysis of the Trauma Quality Improvement Program database.多车辆碰撞后钝器创伤中全身计算机断层扫描的利用趋势:创伤质量改进计划数据库分析。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2021 Jun 1;90(6):951-958. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000003129.
5
Introduction of a pan-scan protocol for blunt trauma activations: what are the consequences?钝性创伤启动的全扫描方案介绍:会有哪些后果?
Am J Emerg Med. 2017 Jan;35(1):13-19. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2016.09.027. Epub 2016 Sep 22.
6
Selective use of computed tomography compared with routine whole body imaging in patients with blunt trauma.选择性使用计算机断层扫描与常规全身成像在钝性创伤患者中的比较。
Ann Emerg Med. 2011 Nov;58(5):407-16.e15. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2011.06.003. Epub 2011 Sep 3.
7
The use of whole body computed tomography scans in pediatric trauma patients: Are there differences among adults and pediatric centers?儿科创伤患者中全身计算机断层扫描的应用:成人中心与儿科中心之间存在差异吗?
J Pediatr Surg. 2016 Apr;51(4):649-53. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2015.12.002. Epub 2015 Dec 12.
8
Implementation of a CT scan practice guideline for pediatric trauma patients reduces unnecessary scans without impacting outcomes.实施 CT 扫描实践指南可减少儿科创伤患者的不必要扫描,而不影响结果。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2018 Sep;85(3):451-458. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000001974.
9
Emergency department practice variation in computed tomography use for children with minor blunt head trauma.急诊科对轻度钝性头部外伤儿童使用计算机断层扫描的实践差异。
J Pediatr. 2014 Dec;165(6):1201-1206.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2014.08.008. Epub 2014 Oct 5.
10
Management of pericardial fluid in blunt trauma: Variability in practice and predictors of operative outcome in patients with computed tomography evidence of pericardial fluid.钝性创伤中心包积液的管理:实践中的变异性及计算机断层扫描显示心包积液患者手术结果的预测因素
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2017 Apr;82(4):733-741. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000001386.

引用本文的文献

1
Diagnostic utility of whole-body computed tomography/pan-scan in trauma: a systematic review and meta-analysis study.全身计算机断层扫描/平扫在创伤中的诊断效用:系统评价和荟萃分析研究。
Emerg Radiol. 2024 Apr;31(2):251-268. doi: 10.1007/s10140-024-02213-5. Epub 2024 Feb 23.
2
European Society of Emergency Radiology: guideline on radiological polytrauma imaging and service (short version).欧洲急诊放射学会:放射学多发伤成像与服务指南(简短版)
Insights Imaging. 2020 Dec 10;11(1):135. doi: 10.1186/s13244-020-00947-7.