Sokol Karadjole Vesna, Agarwal Umber, Berberovic Edina, Poljak Borna, Alfirevic Zarko
University Clinic for Women's Diseases and Delivery, University Clinical Hospital Centre Zagreb, Croatia.
Centre for Women's Health Research, University of Liverpool and Liverpool Women's Hospital, Liverpool, UK.
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2017 Aug;215:45-49. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2017.05.031. Epub 2017 Jun 3.
Methods for the antenatal detection of small for gestational age babies (SGA) differ between countries. The aim of this study was to compare the diagnostic accuracy of routine versus selective small for gestational age babies screening policy using data from two European Maternity Units.
This was a retrospective cohort study from Liverpool Women's Hospital, UK, that uses selective third trimester sonography and from the University Hospital Centre Zagreb, Croatia, that uses routine third trimester sonography for SGA detection. Screen positive cases were defined as pregnancies with estimated fetal weight (EFW) <10th centile at the last 3rd trimester scan. True positives had both EFW and birth weight <10th centile. Pregnancy management data and perinatal outcomes were retrieved from hospital electronic data and special care baby unit (SCBU) reports.
The proportion of small for gestational age babies was higher in Liverpool (7.8%) compared with Zagreb (4%); P<0.001. Sensitivity for detection of SGA babies in Zagreb was 27% (95%CI 15%-44%) and 33% (95%CI 23%-45%) in Liverpool. The specificity was high in both centres (Zagreb 100% (95%CI); Liverpool 98% (95%CI)). The induction of labour for antenatally diagnosed SGA babies was more common in Liverpool (38.5%) than in Zagreb (9.1%). In both centres, all antenatally diagnosed SGA babies admitted to SCBU were preterm babies. Their indications for admission to SCBU were complications related to prematurity.
The effectiveness of selective SGA screening policy is comparable to universal third trimester ultrasound screening. Further prospective evaluations of SGA screening policies are warranted and they should include full cost-effectiveness analysis and assessment of possible harm from increased interventions leading to more preterm births.
不同国家用于产前检测小于胎龄儿(SGA)的方法存在差异。本研究旨在利用来自两个欧洲产科单位的数据,比较常规与选择性小于胎龄儿筛查策略的诊断准确性。
这是一项回顾性队列研究,数据来自英国利物浦妇女医院(采用选择性孕晚期超声检查)和克罗地亚萨格勒布大学医院中心(采用常规孕晚期超声检查来检测小于胎龄儿)。筛查阳性病例定义为在孕晚期最后一次扫描时估计胎儿体重(EFW)<第10百分位数的妊娠。真正的阳性病例是指估计胎儿体重和出生体重均<第10百分位数。从医院电子数据和新生儿重症监护病房(SCBU)报告中获取妊娠管理数据和围产期结局。
与萨格勒布(4%)相比,利物浦小于胎龄儿的比例更高(7.8%);P<0.001。萨格勒布检测小于胎龄儿的敏感性为27%(95%CI 15%-44%),利物浦为33%(95%CI 23%-45%)。两个中心的特异性都很高(萨格勒布100%(95%CI);利物浦98%(95%CI))。产前诊断为小于胎龄儿的引产在利物浦(38.5%)比在萨格勒布(9.1%)更常见。在两个中心,所有产前诊断为小于胎龄儿并入住新生儿重症监护病房的婴儿均为早产儿。他们入住新生儿重症监护病房的指征是与早产相关的并发症。
选择性小于胎龄儿筛查策略的有效性与孕晚期普遍超声筛查相当。有必要对小于胎龄儿筛查策略进行进一步的前瞻性评估,评估应包括全面的成本效益分析以及对因增加干预导致更多早产可能造成的危害的评估。