Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, USA.
VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System, VISN 4 MIRECC, University Drive C, Building 30, Pittsburgh, USA.
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2017 Sep;234(17):2545-2562. doi: 10.1007/s00213-017-4645-2. Epub 2017 Jun 10.
Signals carried by the mesencephalic dopamine system and conveyed to anterior cingulate cortex are critically implicated in probabilistic reward learning and performance monitoring. A common evaluative mechanism purportedly subserves both functions, giving rise to homologous medial frontal negativities in feedback- and response-locked event-related brain potentials (the feedback-related negativity (FRN) and the error-related negativity (ERN), respectively), reflecting dopamine-dependent prediction error signals to unexpectedly negative events. Consistent with this model, the dopamine receptor antagonist, haloperidol, attenuates the ERN, but effects on FRN have not yet been evaluated.
ERN and FRN were recorded during a temporal interval learning task (TILT) following randomized, double-blind administration of haloperidol (3 mg; n = 18), diphenhydramine (an active control for haloperidol; 25 mg; n = 20), or placebo (n = 21) to healthy controls. Centroparietal positivities, the Pe and feedback-locked P300, were also measured and correlations between ERP measures and behavioral indices of learning, overall accuracy, and post-error compensatory behavior were evaluated. We hypothesized that haloperidol would reduce ERN and FRN, but that ERN would uniquely track automatic, error-related performance adjustments, while FRN would be associated with learning and overall accuracy.
As predicted, ERN was reduced by haloperidol and in those exhibiting less adaptive post-error performance; however, these effects were limited to ERNs following fast timing errors. In contrast, the FRN was not affected by drug condition, although increased FRN amplitude was associated with improved accuracy. Significant drug effects on centroparietal positivities were also absent.
Our results support a functional and neurobiological dissociation between the ERN and FRN.
中脑多巴胺系统传递的信号,并传递到前扣带皮层,在概率奖励学习和绩效监测中起着至关重要的作用。据称,一种共同的评估机制为这两种功能提供了支持,在前馈和反应锁定的事件相关脑电位中产生了同源的内侧额负性(分别为反馈相关负性(FRN)和错误相关负性(ERN)),反映了对意外负面事件的多巴胺依赖性预测误差信号。与该模型一致,多巴胺受体拮抗剂氟哌啶醇减弱了 ERN,但尚未评估对 FRN 的影响。
在随机、双盲给予氟哌啶醇(3mg;n=18)、苯海拉明(氟哌啶醇的活性对照;25mg;n=20)或安慰剂(n=21)后,在时间间隔学习任务(TILT)期间记录 ERN 和 FRN。还测量了中央顶区正性波,Pe 和反馈锁定 P300,并评估了 ERP 测量值与学习、整体准确性和错误后补偿行为的行为指标之间的相关性。我们假设氟哌啶醇会降低 ERN 和 FRN,但 ERN 会独特地跟踪自动的、与错误相关的性能调整,而 FRN 则与学习和整体准确性相关。
正如预测的那样,氟哌啶醇降低了 ERN,并且在表现出较少适应性错误后性能的个体中降低了 ERN;然而,这些影响仅限于快速定时错误后的 ERN。相比之下,FRN 不受药物条件的影响,尽管 FRN 振幅增加与准确性提高相关。中央顶区正性波也没有明显的药物效应。
我们的结果支持 ERN 和 FRN 之间的功能和神经生物学分离。