Hauser Tobias U, Iannaccone Reto, Stämpfli Philipp, Drechsler Renate, Brandeis Daniel, Walitza Susanne, Brem Silvia
University Clinics for Child and Adolescent Psychiatry (UCCAP), University of Zurich, Neumünsterallee 9, 8032 Zürich, Switzerland; Neuroscience Center Zurich, University of Zurich and ETH Zurich, Switzerland.
Neuroimage. 2014 Jan 1;84:159-68. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.08.028. Epub 2013 Aug 23.
Changes in response contingencies require adjusting ones assumptions about outcomes of behaviors. Such adaptation processes are driven by reward prediction error (RPE) signals which reflect the inadequacy of expectations. Signals resembling RPEs are known to be encoded by mesencephalic dopamine neurons projecting to the striatum and frontal regions. Although regions that process RPEs, such as the dorsal anterior cingulate cortex (dACC), have been identified, only indirect evidence links timing and network organization of RPE processing in humans. In electroencephalography (EEG), which is well known for its high temporal resolution, the feedback-related negativity (FRN) has been suggested to reflect RPE processing. Recent studies, however, suggested that the FRN might reflect surprise, which would correspond to the absolute, rather than the signed RPE signals. Furthermore, the localization of the FRN remains a matter of debate. In this simultaneous EEG-functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) study, we localized the FRN directly using the superior spatial resolution of fMRI without relying on any spatial constraint or other assumption. Using two different single-trial approaches, we consistently found a cluster within the dACC. One analysis revealed additional activations of the salience network. Furthermore, we evaluated the effect of signed RPEs and surprise signals on the FRN amplitude. We considered that both signals are usually correlated and found that only surprise signals modulate the FRN amplitude. Last, we explored the pathway of RPE signals using dynamic causal modeling (DCM). We found that the surprise signals are directly projected to the source region of the FRN. This finding contradicts earlier theories about the network organization of the FRN, but is in line with a recent theory stating that dopamine neurons also encode surprise-like saliency signals. Our findings crucially advance the understanding of the FRN. We found compelling evidence that the FRN originates from the dACC. Furthermore, we clarified the functional role of the FRN, and determined the role of the dACC within the RPE network. These findings should enable us to study the processing of surprise and adjustment signals in the dACC in healthy and also in psychiatric patients.
反应意外情况的变化需要调整人们对行为结果的假设。这种适应过程由奖励预测误差(RPE)信号驱动,该信号反映了期望的不足。已知投射到纹状体和额叶区域的中脑多巴胺神经元会编码类似RPE的信号。尽管已经确定了处理RPE的区域,如背侧前扣带回皮质(dACC),但只有间接证据将人类RPE处理的时间和网络组织联系起来。在以高时间分辨率而闻名的脑电图(EEG)中,反馈相关负波(FRN)被认为反映了RPE处理。然而,最近的研究表明,FRN可能反映的是惊讶,这与绝对的而非带符号的RPE信号相对应。此外,FRN的定位仍然存在争议。在这项同步脑电图-功能磁共振成像(fMRI)研究中,我们直接利用fMRI的高空间分辨率定位FRN,而不依赖任何空间约束或其他假设。使用两种不同的单试验方法,我们一致在dACC内发现了一个簇。一项分析揭示了突显网络的额外激活。此外,我们评估了带符号的RPE和惊讶信号对FRN振幅的影响。我们认为这两种信号通常是相关的,并发现只有惊讶信号会调节FRN振幅。最后,我们使用动态因果模型(DCM)探索了RPE信号的通路。我们发现惊讶信号直接投射到FRN的源区域。这一发现与早期关于FRN网络组织的理论相矛盾,但与最近一种理论一致,该理论认为多巴胺神经元也编码类似惊讶的突显信号。我们的发现极大地推进了对FRN的理解。我们发现了令人信服的证据表明FRN起源于dACC。此外,我们阐明了FRN的功能作用,并确定了dACC在RPE网络中的作用。这些发现应该使我们能够研究健康人和精神疾病患者dACC中惊讶和调整信号的处理。