Department of Gastroenterology, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey.
Hepatology Division, Centre for Digestive Diseases, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017 Dec;15(12):1950-1956.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2017.06.001. Epub 2017 Jun 8.
BACKGROUND & AIMS: Predniso(lo)ne, alone or in combination with azathioprine, is the standard-of-care (SOC) therapy for autoimmune hepatitis (AIH). However, the SOC therapy is poorly tolerated or does not control disease activity in up to 20% of patients. We assessed the efficacy of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and tacrolimus as second-line therapy for patients with AIH.
We performed a retrospective study of data (from 19 centers in Europe, the United States, Canada, and China) from 201 patients with AIH who received second-line therapy (121 received MMF and 80 received tacrolimus), for a median of 62 months (range, 6-190 mo). Patients were categorized according to their response to SOC. Patients in group 1 (n = 108) had a complete response to the SOC, but were switched to second-line therapy as a result of side effects of predniso(lo)ne or azathioprine, whereas patients in group 2 (n = 93) had not responded to SOC.
There was no significant difference in the proportion of patients with a complete response to MMF (69.4%) vs tacrolimus (72.5%) (P = .639). In group 1, MMF and tacrolimus maintained a biochemical remission in 91.9% and 94.1% of patients, respectively (P = .682). Significantly more group 2 patients given tacrolimus compared with MMF had a complete response (56.5% vs 34%, respectively; P = .029) There were similar proportions of liver-related deaths or liver transplantation among patients given MMF (13.2%) vs tacrolimus (10.3%) (log-rank, P = .472). Ten patients receiving MMF (8.3%) and 10 patients receiving tacrolimus (12.5%) developed side effects that required therapy withdrawal.
Long-term therapy with MMF or tacrolimus generally was well tolerated by patients with AIH. The agents were equally effective in previous complete responders who did not tolerate SOC therapy. Tacrolimus led to a complete response in a greater proportion of previous nonresponder patients compared with MMF.
泼尼松(lo)单独或与硫唑嘌呤联合使用是自身免疫性肝炎(AIH)的标准治疗(SOC)。然而,SOC 治疗在多达 20%的患者中耐受性差或无法控制疾病活动。我们评估了吗替麦考酚酯(MMF)和他克莫司作为 AIH 二线治疗的疗效。
我们对来自欧洲、美国、加拿大和中国的 201 名接受二线治疗(121 名接受 MMF,80 名接受他克莫司)的 AIH 患者的数据(来自 19 个中心)进行了回顾性研究,中位随访时间为 62 个月(范围,6-190 个月)。根据对 SOC 的反应将患者分类。第 1 组(n=108)患者对 SOC 有完全反应,但由于泼尼松(lo)或硫唑嘌呤的副作用而改用二线治疗,而第 2 组(n=93)患者对 SOC 无反应。
MMF(69.4%)与他克莫司(72.5%)完全缓解的患者比例无显著差异(P=0.639)。在第 1 组中,MMF 和他克莫司分别使 91.9%和 94.1%的患者维持生化缓解(P=0.682)。与 MMF 相比,给予他克莫司的第 2 组患者完全缓解的比例显著更高(分别为 56.5%和 34%;P=0.029)。接受 MMF(13.2%)和他克莫司(10.3%)治疗的患者中,与肝脏相关的死亡或肝移植比例相似(对数秩检验,P=0.472)。10 名接受 MMF(8.3%)治疗的患者和 10 名接受他克莫司(12.5%)治疗的患者出现需要停药的副作用。
长期接受 MMF 或他克莫司治疗的 AIH 患者通常耐受性良好。这两种药物对以前不能耐受 SOC 治疗的完全缓解患者同样有效。与 MMF 相比,他克莫司在以前的无反应患者中导致完全缓解的比例更高。