• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

吉西他滨联合治疗与单纯吉西他滨治疗晚期胰腺癌的比较:九项随机对照试验的荟萃分析

Gemcitabine-based combination therapy compared with gemcitabine alone for advanced pancreatic cancer: a meta-analysis of nine randomized controlled trials.

作者信息

Jin Shui-Fang, Fan Zhao-Kun, Pan Lei, Jin Li-Ming

机构信息

Department of General Surgery, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital, Hangzhou 310014, China.

出版信息

Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int. 2017 Jun;16(3):236-244. doi: 10.1016/s1499-3872(17)60022-5.

DOI:10.1016/s1499-3872(17)60022-5
PMID:28603091
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Pancreatic cancer is one of the most aggressive malignancies and chemotherapy is an effective strategy for advanced pancreatic cancer. Gemcitabine (GEM) is one of first-line agents. However, GEM-based combination therapy has shown promising efficacy in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer. This meta-analysis aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of GEM-based combination therapy versus GEM alone in the treatment of advanced pancreatic cancer.

DATA SOURCES

A comprehensive search of literature was performed using PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. A quantitative meta-analysis was performed based on the inclusion criteria from all eligible randomized controlled trials. The outcome indicators included overall survival (OS), 6-month survival, 1-year survival, progression-free survival/time-to-progression (PFS/TTP), and toxicities.

RESULTS

A total of nine randomized controlled trials involving 1661 patients were included in this meta-analysis. There was significant improvement in the GEM-based combination therapy with regard to the OS (HR=0.85, 95% CI: 0.76-0.95, P=0.003), PFS (HR=0.76, 95% CI: 0.65-0.90, P=0.002), 6-month survival (RR=1.09, 95% CI: 1.01-1.17, P=0.03), and the overall toxicity (RR=1.68, 95% CI: 1.52-1.86, P<0.01). However, there was no significant difference in the 1-year survival.

CONCLUSIONS

GEM-based combination chemotherapy might improve the OS, 6-month survival, and PFS in advanced pancreatic cancer. However, combined therapy also added toxicity.

摘要

背景

胰腺癌是侵袭性最强的恶性肿瘤之一,化疗是晚期胰腺癌的有效治疗策略。吉西他滨(GEM)是一线治疗药物之一。然而,基于吉西他滨的联合治疗在晚期胰腺癌患者中已显示出有前景的疗效。本荟萃分析旨在比较基于吉西他滨的联合治疗与单纯吉西他滨治疗晚期胰腺癌的疗效和安全性。

数据来源

使用PubMed、EMBASE、科学网和Cochrane对照试验中心注册库对文献进行全面检索。根据所有符合条件的随机对照试验的纳入标准进行定量荟萃分析。结局指标包括总生存期(OS)、6个月生存率、1年生存率、无进展生存期/疾病进展时间(PFS/TTP)和毒性。

结果

本荟萃分析共纳入9项涉及1661例患者的随机对照试验。基于吉西他滨的联合治疗在OS(HR = 0.85,95%CI:0.76 - 0.95,P = 0.003)、PFS(HR = 0.76,95%CI:0.65 - 0.90,P = 0.002)、6个月生存率(RR = 1.09,95%CI:1.01 - 1.17,P = 0.03)和总体毒性(RR = 1.68,95%CI:1.52 - 1.86,P < 0.01)方面有显著改善。然而,1年生存率无显著差异。

结论

基于吉西他滨的联合化疗可能改善晚期胰腺癌的OS、6个月生存率和PFS。然而,联合治疗也增加了毒性。

相似文献

1
Gemcitabine-based combination therapy compared with gemcitabine alone for advanced pancreatic cancer: a meta-analysis of nine randomized controlled trials.吉西他滨联合治疗与单纯吉西他滨治疗晚期胰腺癌的比较:九项随机对照试验的荟萃分析
Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int. 2017 Jun;16(3):236-244. doi: 10.1016/s1499-3872(17)60022-5.
2
Gemcitabine and S-1 combination chemotherapy versus gemcitabine alone for locally advanced and metastatic pancreatic cancer: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials in Asia.吉西他滨与S-1联合化疗对比单纯吉西他滨治疗局部晚期和转移性胰腺癌:一项亚洲随机对照试验的荟萃分析
J Chemother. 2015 Aug;27(4):227-34. doi: 10.1179/1973947815Y.0000000013. Epub 2015 Mar 20.
3
Meta-analysis on inoperable pancreatic cancer: a comparison between gemcitabine-based combination therapy and gemcitabine alone.不可切除胰腺癌的荟萃分析:基于吉西他滨的联合疗法与单纯吉西他滨治疗的比较
World J Gastroenterol. 2006 Nov 21;12(43):6973-81. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v12.i43.6973.
4
Gemcitabine Compared With Gemcitabine and S-1 Combination Therapy in Advanced Pancreatic Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.吉西他滨与吉西他滨联合S-1治疗晚期胰腺癌的疗效比较:一项系统评价与Meta分析
Medicine (Baltimore). 2015 Sep;94(35):e1345. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000001345.
5
Meta-analysis on resected pancreatic cancer: a comparison between adjuvant treatments and gemcitabine alone.Meta 分析切除的胰腺癌:辅助治疗与单独吉西他滨的比较。
BMC Cancer. 2018 Oct 23;18(1):1034. doi: 10.1186/s12885-018-4948-7.
6
[Meta-analysis on gemcitabine of fixed-dose rate infusion plus oxaliplatin as first-line therapy for advanced pancreatic cancer].吉西他滨固定剂量率输注联合奥沙利铂作为晚期胰腺癌一线治疗的荟萃分析
Ai Zheng. 2007 Aug;26(8):895-9.
7
Meta-analysis of randomized trials: evaluation of benefit from gemcitabine-based combination chemotherapy applied in advanced pancreatic cancer.随机试验的荟萃分析:评估吉西他滨为基础的联合化疗应用于晚期胰腺癌的获益情况。
BMC Cancer. 2008 Mar 28;8:82. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-8-82.
8
The addition of S-1 to gemcitabine-based chemotherapy improves survival with increased toxicity for patients with advanced pancreatic cancer: combined meta-analysis of efficacy and safety profile.对于晚期胰腺癌患者,在基于吉西他滨的化疗中添加S-1可提高生存率,但毒性增加:疗效和安全性概况的联合荟萃分析。
Clin Res Hepatol Gastroenterol. 2015 Apr;39(2):254-60. doi: 10.1016/j.clinre.2014.08.012. Epub 2014 Oct 7.
9
Gemcitabine plus cisplatin versus gemcitabine alone in the treatment of pancreatic cancer: a meta-analysis.吉西他滨联合顺铂与单纯吉西他滨治疗胰腺癌的Meta分析
World J Surg Oncol. 2016 Feb 29;14:59. doi: 10.1186/s12957-016-0813-9.
10
Efficacy and safety of gemcitabine-capecitabine combination therapy for pancreatic cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.吉西他滨-卡培他滨联合治疗胰腺癌的疗效和安全性:一项随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2021 Dec 3;100(48):e27870. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000027870.

引用本文的文献

1
Adjuvant gemcitabine after resection of pancreatic cancer without significant difference in overall survival: a retrospective cohort study.胰腺癌切除术后辅助使用吉西他滨对总生存期无显著差异:一项回顾性队列研究。
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2023 May 20;85(7):3284-3290. doi: 10.1097/MS9.0000000000000854. eCollection 2023 Jul.
2
Targeted therapy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: Mechanisms and clinical study.胰腺导管腺癌的靶向治疗:机制与临床研究。
MedComm (2020). 2023 Feb 19;4(2):e216. doi: 10.1002/mco2.216. eCollection 2023 Apr.
3
Efficacy and safety of gemcitabine-capecitabine combination therapy for pancreatic cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
吉西他滨-卡培他滨联合治疗胰腺癌的疗效和安全性:一项随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2021 Dec 3;100(48):e27870. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000027870.
4
Two Possible Strategies for Drug Modification of Gemcitabine and Future Contributions to Personalized Medicine.两种可能的吉西他滨药物修饰策略及其对个性化医学的未来贡献。
Molecules. 2022 Jan 4;27(1):291. doi: 10.3390/molecules27010291.
5
Targeting Notch to Maximize Chemotherapeutic Benefits: Rationale, Advanced Strategies, and Future Perspectives.靶向Notch以最大化化疗益处:理论依据、先进策略及未来展望。
Cancers (Basel). 2021 Oct 12;13(20):5106. doi: 10.3390/cancers13205106.
6
Chemotherapeutic efficacy of cucurmosin for pancreatic cancer as an alternative of gemcitabine: a comparative metabolomic study.葫芦素作为吉西他滨替代品对胰腺癌的化疗疗效:一项比较代谢组学研究
Gland Surg. 2020 Oct;9(5):1428-1442. doi: 10.21037/gs-20-202.
7
Bitter melon juice intake with gemcitabine intervention circumvents resistance to gemcitabine in pancreatic patient-derived xenograft tumors.苦瓜汁联合吉西他滨干预可规避胰腺患者来源异种移植瘤对吉西他滨的耐药性。
Mol Carcinog. 2020 Oct;59(10):1227-1240. doi: 10.1002/mc.23251. Epub 2020 Aug 20.
8
Validation and application of a prognostic model for patients with advanced pancreatic cancer receiving palliative chemotherapy.验证和应用晚期胰腺癌患者接受姑息化疗的预后模型。
Cancer Med. 2019 Sep;8(12):5554-5563. doi: 10.1002/cam4.2483. Epub 2019 Aug 6.
9
Combination therapy versus gemcitabine monotherapy in the treatment of elderly pancreatic cancer: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.联合治疗与吉西他滨单药治疗老年胰腺癌的疗效比较:一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析
Drug Des Devel Ther. 2018 Mar 7;12:475-480. doi: 10.2147/DDDT.S156766. eCollection 2018.