• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

验证和应用晚期胰腺癌患者接受姑息化疗的预后模型。

Validation and application of a prognostic model for patients with advanced pancreatic cancer receiving palliative chemotherapy.

机构信息

Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Taoyuan, Taiwan.

Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Mackay Memorial Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.

出版信息

Cancer Med. 2019 Sep;8(12):5554-5563. doi: 10.1002/cam4.2483. Epub 2019 Aug 6.

DOI:10.1002/cam4.2483
PMID:31385456
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6745849/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

We previously developed a robust prognostic model (GS model) to predict the survival outcome of patients with advanced pancreatic cancer (APC) receiving palliative chemotherapy with gemcitabine plus S-1 (GS). This study aimed to validate the application of the GS model in APC patients receiving chemotherapy other than the GS regimen.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 727 APC patients who received first-line palliative chemotherapy other than the GS regimen between 2010 and 2016 at four institutions in Taiwan. The patients were categorized into three prognostic groups based on the GS model for comparisons of survival outcome, best tumor response, and in-group survival differences with monotherapy or combination therapy.

RESULTS

The median survival times for the good, intermediate, and poor prognostic groups were 13.4, 8.4, and 4.6 months, respectively. The hazard ratios for the comparisons of intermediate and poor to good prognostic groups were 1.51 (95% confidence interval [CI]), 1.22-1.88, P < .001) and 2.84 (95% CI, 2.34-3.45, P < .001). The best tumor responses with either partial response or stable disease were 57.5%, 40.4%, and 17.2% of patients in the good, intermediate, and poor prognostic groups (P < .001), respectively. For patients in the good prognostic group, first-line chemotherapy with monotherapy and combination therapy had similar median survival times (13.8 vs 12.9 months, P = .26), while combination therapy showed a better median survival time than monotherapy in patients in the intermediate and poor prognostic groups (8.5 vs 8.0 months, P = .038 and 5.7 vs 3.7 months, P = .001, respectively).

CONCLUSION

The results of our study supported the application of the GS model as a general prognostic tool for patients with pancreatic cancer receiving first-line palliative chemotherapy with gemcitabine-based regimens.

摘要

背景

我们之前开发了一个强大的预后模型(GS 模型),用于预测接受吉西他滨加 S-1(GS)姑息化疗的晚期胰腺癌(APC)患者的生存结果。本研究旨在验证 GS 模型在接受非 GS 方案化疗的 APC 患者中的应用。

方法

我们回顾性分析了 2010 年至 2016 年在台湾四家机构接受非 GS 方案一线姑息化疗的 727 例 APC 患者。根据 GS 模型将患者分为三个预后组,比较生存结果、最佳肿瘤反应以及单药或联合治疗的组内生存差异。

结果

良好、中等和差预后组的中位生存时间分别为 13.4、8.4 和 4.6 个月。中间和差预后组与良好预后组比较的风险比分别为 1.51(95%置信区间 [CI])、1.22-1.88,P<.001)和 2.84(95%CI,2.34-3.45,P<.001)。具有部分缓解或稳定疾病的最佳肿瘤反应在良好、中等和差预后组中的患者分别为 57.5%、40.4%和 17.2%(P<.001)。对于良好预后组的患者,单药和联合治疗的一线化疗具有相似的中位生存时间(13.8 与 12.9 个月,P=.26),而对于中等和差预后组的患者,联合治疗的中位生存时间优于单药治疗(8.5 与 8.0 个月,P=.038 和 5.7 与 3.7 个月,P=.001)。

结论

我们的研究结果支持将 GS 模型作为接受吉西他滨为基础方案一线姑息化疗的胰腺癌患者的一般预后工具的应用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9c2d/6745849/200278fe0514/CAM4-8-5554-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9c2d/6745849/ab12eb404c9f/CAM4-8-5554-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9c2d/6745849/eebba8833214/CAM4-8-5554-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9c2d/6745849/84bc91ded744/CAM4-8-5554-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9c2d/6745849/200278fe0514/CAM4-8-5554-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9c2d/6745849/ab12eb404c9f/CAM4-8-5554-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9c2d/6745849/eebba8833214/CAM4-8-5554-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9c2d/6745849/84bc91ded744/CAM4-8-5554-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9c2d/6745849/200278fe0514/CAM4-8-5554-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Validation and application of a prognostic model for patients with advanced pancreatic cancer receiving palliative chemotherapy.验证和应用晚期胰腺癌患者接受姑息化疗的预后模型。
Cancer Med. 2019 Sep;8(12):5554-5563. doi: 10.1002/cam4.2483. Epub 2019 Aug 6.
2
A prognostic index model to predict the clinical outcomes for advanced pancreatic cancer patients following palliative chemotherapy.一种用于预测晚期胰腺癌患者姑息化疗后临床结局的预后指数模型。
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2015 Sep;141(9):1653-60. doi: 10.1007/s00432-015-1953-y. Epub 2015 Mar 20.
3
Gemcitabine and S-1 combination chemotherapy versus gemcitabine alone for locally advanced and metastatic pancreatic cancer: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials in Asia.吉西他滨与S-1联合化疗对比单纯吉西他滨治疗局部晚期和转移性胰腺癌:一项亚洲随机对照试验的荟萃分析
J Chemother. 2015 Aug;27(4):227-34. doi: 10.1179/1973947815Y.0000000013. Epub 2015 Mar 20.
4
Efficacy and safety comparison of nabpaclitaxel plus S-1 and gemcitabine plus S-1 as first-line chemotherapy for metastatic pancreatic cancer.纳米紫杉醇联合S-1与吉西他滨联合S-1作为转移性胰腺癌一线化疗的疗效和安全性比较
Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2018 Jun 1;48(6):535-541. doi: 10.1093/jjco/hyy063.
5
Efficacy of S-1 in second-line chemotherapy after nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine for patients with advanced pancreatic cancer.白蛋白紫杉醇联合吉西他滨二线化疗失败后替吉奥单药治疗晚期胰腺癌的疗效。
Cancer Rep (Hoboken). 2020 Apr;3(2):e1215. doi: 10.1002/cnr2.1215. Epub 2019 Aug 28.
6
Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio for predicting palliative chemotherapy outcomes in advanced pancreatic cancer patients.中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值预测晚期胰腺癌患者姑息化疗疗效
Cancer Med. 2014 Apr;3(2):406-15. doi: 10.1002/cam4.204. Epub 2014 Feb 12.
7
Clinical outcome of elderly patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer treated with gemcitabine plus S-1, S-1 alone, or gemcitabine alone: Subgroup analysis of a randomised phase III trial, GEST study.吉西他滨联合S-1、单纯S-1或单纯吉西他滨治疗不可切除胰腺癌老年患者的临床结局:一项随机III期试验(GEST研究)的亚组分析
Eur J Cancer. 2016 Feb;54:96-103. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2015.11.002. Epub 2015 Dec 30.
8
Gemcitabine Compared With Gemcitabine and S-1 Combination Therapy in Advanced Pancreatic Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.吉西他滨与吉西他滨联合S-1治疗晚期胰腺癌的疗效比较:一项系统评价与Meta分析
Medicine (Baltimore). 2015 Sep;94(35):e1345. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000001345.
9
Gemcitabine and S-1 versus gemcitabine and cisplatin treatment in patients with advanced biliary tract cancer: a multicenter retrospective study.吉西他滨与S-1对比吉西他滨与顺铂治疗晚期胆管癌患者:一项多中心回顾性研究
Invest New Drugs. 2017 Jun;35(3):269-276. doi: 10.1007/s10637-017-0430-7. Epub 2017 Jan 26.
10
The impact of body composition on short-term outcomes of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with gemcitabine plus S-1 in patients with resectable pancreatic cancer.体成分对可切除胰腺癌患者吉西他滨联合 S-1 新辅助化疗短期结局的影响。
Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2021 Apr 1;51(4):604-611. doi: 10.1093/jjco/hyaa247.

引用本文的文献

1
Eukaryotic Translation Initiation Factor 3 Subunit B Is a Promoter in the Development and Progression of Pancreatic Cancer.真核生物翻译起始因子3亚基B是胰腺癌发生发展的一个促进因子。
Front Oncol. 2021 Apr 29;11:644156. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.644156. eCollection 2021.

本文引用的文献

1
Systemic immune-inflammation index predicts prognosis of patients with advanced pancreatic cancer.系统免疫炎症指数预测晚期胰腺癌患者的预后。
J Transl Med. 2019 Jan 18;17(1):30. doi: 10.1186/s12967-019-1782-x.
2
Prognostic Factors for Advanced Pancreatic Cancer Treated with Gemcitabine Plus S-1: Retrospective Analysis and Development of a Prognostic Model.吉西他滨联合S-1治疗晚期胰腺癌的预后因素:回顾性分析及预后模型的建立
Cancers (Basel). 2019 Jan 9;11(1):57. doi: 10.3390/cancers11010057.
3
Neutrophil to Lymphocyte Ratio as a Predictor of Poor Prognosis in Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer Patients Treated with Nab-Paclitaxel plus Gemcitabine: A Propensity Score Analysis.
中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值作为接受白蛋白结合型紫杉醇联合吉西他滨治疗的转移性胰腺癌患者预后不良的预测指标:一项倾向评分分析
Gastroenterol Res Pract. 2018 Jun 10;2018:2373868. doi: 10.1155/2018/2373868. eCollection 2018.
4
Prediction of overall survival for metastatic pancreatic cancer: Development and validation of a prognostic nomogram with data from open clinical trial and real-world study.转移性胰腺癌总生存期的预测:基于开放临床试验和真实世界研究数据构建并验证预后列线图
Cancer Med. 2018 Jul;7(7):2974-2984. doi: 10.1002/cam4.1573. Epub 2018 Jun 1.
5
A Survival Model in Locally Advanced and Metastatic Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma.局部晚期和转移性胰腺导管腺癌的生存模型
J Cancer. 2018 Mar 22;9(7):1301-1307. doi: 10.7150/jca.23984. eCollection 2018.
6
Cancer statistics, 2018.癌症统计数据,2018 年。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2018 Jan;68(1):7-30. doi: 10.3322/caac.21442. Epub 2018 Jan 4.
7
Development and Validation of a Nomogram for Predicting Survival in Patients with Advanced Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma.开发并验证用于预测晚期胰腺导管腺癌患者生存情况的列线图
Sci Rep. 2017 Sep 14;7(1):11524. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-11227-8.
8
Validation of Lymphocyte-to-Monocyte Ratio as a Prognostic Factor in Advanced Pancreatic Cancer: An East Asian Cohort Study of 2 Countries.淋巴细胞与单核细胞比值作为晚期胰腺癌预后因素的验证:一项对两个国家的东亚队列研究
Pancreas. 2017 Sep;46(8):1011-1017. doi: 10.1097/MPA.0000000000000891.
9
Gemcitabine-based combination therapy compared with gemcitabine alone for advanced pancreatic cancer: a meta-analysis of nine randomized controlled trials.吉西他滨联合治疗与单纯吉西他滨治疗晚期胰腺癌的比较:九项随机对照试验的荟萃分析
Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int. 2017 Jun;16(3):236-244. doi: 10.1016/s1499-3872(17)60022-5.
10
Updated results from GEST study: a randomized, three-arm phase III study for advanced pancreatic cancer.GEST研究的更新结果:一项针对晚期胰腺癌的随机、三臂III期研究。
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2017 Jun;143(6):1053-1059. doi: 10.1007/s00432-017-2349-y. Epub 2017 Feb 16.