Vo Evanly, Zhuang Ziqing, Birch Eileen, Birch Quinn
National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, National Personal Protective Technology Laboratory, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Division of Applied Research and Technology, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.
Aerosol Sci Technol. 2016;50(10):1044-1054. doi: 10.1080/02786826.2016.1216519. Epub 2016 Jul 22.
The aim of this study was to apply a direct-reading aerosol instrument method and an elemental carbon (EC) analysis method to measure the mass-based penetration of single-walled carbon nanotubes (SWCNTs) and multi-walled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs) through elastomeric half-mask respirators (EHRs) and filtering facepiece respirators (FFRs). For the direct-reading aerosol instrument method, two scanning mobility particle sizer/aerodynamic particle sizer systems were used to simultaneously determine the upstream (outside respirator) and downstream (inside respirator) test aerosols. For the EC analysis method, upstream and downstream CNTs were collected on filter cassettes and then analyzed using a thermal-optical technique. CNT mass penetrations were found in both methods to be within the associated efficiency requirements for each type and class of the respirator models that were tested. Generally, the penetrations of SWCNTs and MWCNTs had a similar trend with penetration being the highest for the N95 EHRs, followed by N95 FFRs, P100 EHRs, and P100 FFRs. This trend held true for both methods; however, the CNT penetration determined by the direct-reading aerosol instrument method (0.009-1.09% for SWCNTs and 0.005-0.21% for MWCNTs) was greater relative to the penetration values found through EC analysis method (0.007-0.69% for SWCNTs and 0.004-0.13% for MWCNTs). The results of this study illustrate considerations for how the methods can be used to evaluate penetration of morphologically complex materials through FFRs and EHRs.
本研究的目的是应用直读式气溶胶仪器法和元素碳(EC)分析法,来测量单壁碳纳米管(SWCNTs)和多壁碳纳米管(MWCNTs)通过弹性半面罩呼吸器(EHRs)和过滤式面罩呼吸器(FFRs)的基于质量的穿透率。对于直读式气溶胶仪器法,使用两个扫描迁移率粒径分析仪/空气动力学粒径分析仪系统同时测定上游(呼吸器外部)和下游(呼吸器内部)的测试气溶胶。对于EC分析法,将上游和下游的碳纳米管收集在滤盒上,然后采用热光技术进行分析。在两种方法中均发现,碳纳米管的质量穿透率在测试的每种型号和类别的呼吸器的相关效率要求范围内。一般来说,SWCNTs和MWCNTs的穿透率趋势相似,N95 EHRs的穿透率最高,其次是N95 FFRs、P100 EHRs和P100 FFRs。两种方法的情况均如此;然而,直读式气溶胶仪器法测定的碳纳米管穿透率(SWCNTs为0.009 - 1.09%,MWCNTs为0.005 - 0.21%)相对于通过EC分析法得到的穿透率值(SWCNTs为0.007 - 0.69%,MWCNTs为0.004 - 0.13%)更高。本研究结果说明了如何使用这些方法来评估形态复杂的材料通过FFRs和EHRs的穿透率的相关考量因素。