Arvidsson Anna, Vauquline Polly, Johnsdotter Sara, Essén Birgitta
a Department of Women's and Children's Health/IMCH , Uppsala University , Uppsala , Sweden.
b Department of Women's Studies , Gauhati University , Guwahati , India.
Glob Health Action. 2017;10(1):1328890. doi: 10.1080/16549716.2017.1328890.
Surrogacy is a reproductive practice that has been strongly marketed in India as a solution for childless couples. As a result, the number of surrogacy clinics is increasing. Meanwhile, a global discourse on surrogacy, originating from a Western perspective, has characterized surrogacy as being exploitative of women in low-income settings, where poverty drives them to become surrogate mothers.
This study explored perspectives on surrogacy from men and women in Assam, an Indian state known to be a low-income setting. Surrogacy arrangements in Assam are still uncommon. It can be expected that the dominant global discourses on surrogacy will be unfamiliar to the general population, and the objective was also to position the results within the divergent global discourses of surrogacy.
In order to explore local views on surrogacy, we conducted individual interviews and focus group discussions with people from various socioeconomic groups in Assam.
Our findings reveal that people in Assam perceive surrogacy as a good option for a childless couple, as it would result in a child who is a 'blood' relation - something highly desirable for sociocultural reasons. However, the part played by the surrogate mother complicates local views on surrogacy. Most people consider payment to the surrogate mother contrary to societal norms. A surrogate mother is also often judged in a moral light, either as a 'bad mother' for selling her child, or as a 'noble woman' who has helped a childless couple and deserves payment for her services.
In order to decrease the stigmatization of women, a regulatory policy is needed that will take into account the complex understandings of surrogacy and perceptions of surrogate mothers in Indian society. In policy, the possible effect of the dominant exploitation discourse needs to be modulated by local understandings of this reproduction method.
代孕是一种生殖行为,在印度被大力推广,作为解决无子女夫妇问题的一种方式。因此,代孕诊所的数量在不断增加。与此同时,源自西方视角的关于代孕的全球讨论,将代孕描述为对低收入环境中女性的剥削,在这种环境下,贫困驱使她们成为代孕母亲。
本研究探讨了印度低收入邦阿萨姆邦男性和女性对代孕的看法。阿萨姆邦的代孕安排仍然不常见。可以预期,代孕的主流全球话语对于普通民众来说并不熟悉,研究目的还包括将研究结果置于代孕的不同全球话语背景中。
为了探究当地人对代孕的看法,我们对阿萨姆邦不同社会经济群体的人进行了个人访谈和焦点小组讨论。
我们的研究结果显示,阿萨姆邦的人们认为代孕对无子女夫妇来说是一个不错的选择,因为这会生出有“血缘”关系的孩子——出于社会文化原因,这是非常令人向往的。然而,代孕母亲所扮演的角色使当地人对代孕的看法变得复杂。大多数人认为向代孕母亲支付报酬违背社会规范。代孕母亲也常常从道德角度受到评判,要么被视为出卖自己孩子的“坏母亲”,要么被视为帮助了无子女夫妇且其服务应得报酬的“高尚女性”。
为了减少对女性的污名化,需要一项监管政策,该政策要考虑到印度社会对代孕和代孕母亲的复杂理解。在政策制定中,占主导地位的剥削话语的可能影响需要根据当地人对这种生殖方式的理解进行调整。