O'Sullivan Molly P, Nagy Matthew R, Block Shannon S, Tooley Trevor R, Robinson Leah E, Colabianchi Natalie, Hasson Rebecca E
1 University of Michigan.
Pediatr Exerc Sci. 2018 May 1;30(2):259-265. doi: 10.1123/pes.2017-0078. Epub 2017 Oct 12.
The purpose of this study was to compare the effects of intermittent activity performed at varying intensities and of prolonged sitting on physical activity compensation.
A total of 33 children (14 boys and 19 girls; age 7-11 y; 24% overweight/obese; 61% nonwhite) completed 4 experimental conditions in random order: 8 hours of sitting interrupted with 20 two-minute low-, moderate-, or high-intensity activity breaks or 20 two-minute sedentary computer game breaks. Physical activity energy expenditure (PAEE) was assessed via accelerometry to establish baseline PAEE and throughout each condition day (8-h in-lab PAEE, out-of-lab PAEE, and 3-d postcondition).
Compared with baseline PAEE, total daily PAEE was significantly higher during the high-intensity condition day (153 ± 43 kcal, P = .03), unchanged during the low-intensity (-40 ± 23 kcal, P > .05) and moderate-intensity condition days (-11 ± 18 kcal, P > .05), and decreased in response to prolonged sitting (-79 ± 22 kcal, P = .03). There were no significant differences in PAEE 3-day postcondition across conditions (P > .05).
Despite the varying levels of PAEE accumulated during the 8-hour laboratory conditions, out-of-lab PAEE during each condition day and 3-day postcondition did not change from the baseline. These findings provide preliminary evidence that spontaneous physical activity in children does not change in response to intermittent activity or prolonged sitting.
本研究旨在比较不同强度的间歇性活动和长时间坐着对身体活动补偿的影响。
共有33名儿童(14名男孩和19名女孩;年龄7 - 11岁;24%超重/肥胖;61%非白人)以随机顺序完成4种实验条件:8小时的坐姿,期间穿插20次两分钟的低、中、高强度活动休息或20次两分钟的久坐电脑游戏休息。通过加速度计评估身体活动能量消耗(PAEE)以建立基线PAEE,并在每个条件日(8小时实验室PAEE、实验室外PAEE和条件后3天)进行评估。
与基线PAEE相比,高强度条件日的每日总PAEE显著更高(153±43千卡,P = 0.03),低强度条件日(-40±23千卡,P>0.05)和中等强度条件日(-11±18千卡,P>0.05)未发生变化,而长时间坐着后PAEE下降(-79±22千卡,P = 0.03)。不同条件下条件后3天的PAEE无显著差异(P>0.05)。
尽管在8小时实验室条件下积累的PAEE水平不同,但每个条件日的实验室外PAEE和条件后3天与基线相比没有变化。这些发现提供了初步证据,表明儿童的自发身体活动不会因间歇性活动或长时间坐着而改变。