Suppr超能文献

[动态对比增强磁共振成像在评估甲状腺相关性眼病病程中的价值]

[The value of DCE-MRI in assessing the course of thyroid associated ophthalmopathy].

作者信息

Wu T, Tang D R, Wang F, Xia S, Sun F Y

机构信息

Department of Ophthalmology, Tianjin First Center Hospital, Tianjin 300192, China.

出版信息

Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi. 2017 Jun 11;53(6):430-435. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0412-4081.2017.06.007.

Abstract

To explore the feasibility of the semi-quantitative rectus extraocular muscle (EOM) parameters of dynamic contrast-enhanced magetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) in assessing the clinical course of thyroid associated ophthalmopathy (TAO). It was a retrospective case series study. A total of 136 cases of TAO were recruited from March 2011 to October 2012 in the Tianjin the first center hospital including 63 males and 72 females, aged 24.0-65.0 years, with an average age of (40.5±10.9) years. Forty healthy volunteers were recruited as control group (CG). According to clinical activity score (CAS), all TAO patients were divided into 2 groups, activity group (AG) and inactivity group (IAG). MRI and DCE-MRI orbit scan were performed in each subject. Drew time-intensity curves (TIC) by Siemens 3.0 MR (syngo) post-processing workstation. The semi-quantitative parameters of DCE-MRI were calculated. The semi-quantitative paramters based on TIC include early enhancement coefficient (EEC), maximum enhancement coefficient (Emax) and wash-out coefficient (WC(5min)). Kruskal-Wallis H rank test was used for comparing signal intensity among 3 groups, and Nemenyi test for pairwise comparison between groups. The DCE-MRI parameters (EEC, Emax, WC(5 min)) among groups were compared by one-way ANOVA, and Bonferroni test is for pairwise comparison between groups. The diagnostic value of mean EEC, mean Emax, WC(5min) for assessment of the clinical course in TAO was analyzed by ROC curve. There were significant difference in signal intensity (SI) of rectus EOM on T(2)WI among CG, AG and IAG, which is significantly different in 88 cases of AG including 45 cases of high intensity 51.1%, 23 cases of moderate intensity 26.1%, and 20 cases of low intensity 22.7%,compared with CG and IAG. EEC (0.05), Emax and WC5min values of rectus EOM of TAO group were significantly lower than those of CG(0.05), which values of rectus EOM of TAO active group of EEC are 0.63±0.06、0.61±0.05、0.56±0.09、0.57±0.09, and values of rectus EOM of TAO inactive group of EEC are 0.49±0.05、0.50±0.08、0.57±0.10、0.55±0.09. The values of rectus EOM of TAO active group of Emax are 1.35±0.09、1.28±0.09、1.21±0.17、1.25±0.10, and the values of rectus EOM of TAO inactive group of Emax are 1.04±0.06、1.05±0.10、1.20±0.19、1.16±0.11. The values of rectus EOM of TAO active group of WC(5 min) are 0.13±0.03、0.13±0.03、0.13±0.06、0.13±0.03 and the values of rectus EOM of TAO inactive group of WC5min are 0.08±0.02、0.79±0.03、0.11±0.06、0.09± 0.03. EEC (χ(2)=9.20, 0.05), Emax and WC(5min) values of rectus EOM of TAO group were significantly lower than those of CG (0.05). EEC, Emax and WC(5min) values of medial rectus and inferior rectus EOM of IAG were significantly lower than those of AG(0.05). WC(5min) values of superior rectus EOM of IAG were significantly lower than those of AG (0.05). There were no differences in EEC and Emax values of lateral rectus and superior rectus EOM between IAG and AG (0.05). There were no differences in WC(5min) values of lateral rectus EOM between IAG and AG (0.05). The area under the curve (AUC) were 0.771, 0.879, 0.898 for mean EEC, mean Emax, and mean WC(5min), respectively. The semi-quantitative paramters of DCE-MRI can show the clinical activity of TAO patients and can be considered as the quantitative index of TAO activity staging. .

摘要

探讨动态对比增强磁共振成像(DCE-MRI)的眼外直肌半定量参数评估甲状腺相关眼病(TAO)临床病程的可行性。这是一项回顾性病例系列研究。2011年3月至2012年10月期间,天津市第一中心医院共招募了136例TAO患者,其中男性63例,女性72例,年龄24.0 - 65.0岁,平均年龄(40.5±10.9)岁。招募了40名健康志愿者作为对照组(CG)。根据临床活动评分(CAS),将所有TAO患者分为两组,活动组(AG)和非活动组(IAG)。对每个受试者进行MRI和DCE-MRI眼眶扫描。通过西门子3.0 MR(syngo)后处理工作站绘制时间-强度曲线(TIC)。计算DCE-MRI的半定量参数。基于TIC的半定量参数包括早期增强系数(EEC)、最大增强系数(Emax)和洗脱系数(WC(5min))。采用Kruskal-Wallis H秩和检验比较三组间的信号强度,采用Nemenyi检验进行组间两两比较。采用单因素方差分析比较各组间DCE-MRI参数(EEC、Emax、WC(5 min)),采用Bonferroni检验进行组间两两比较。通过ROC曲线分析平均EEC、平均Emax、WC(5min)对TAO临床病程评估的诊断价值。CG、AG和IAG组眼外直肌在T(2)WI上的信号强度(SI)存在显著差异,AG组88例中差异显著,其中高强度45例(51.1%),中等强度23例(26.1%),低强度20例(22.7%),与CG和IAG组相比。TAO组眼外直肌的EEC(P<0.05)、Emax和WC5min值显著低于CG组(P<0.05),TAO活动组眼外直肌EEC值分别为0.63±0.06、0.61±0.05、0.56±0.09、0.57±0.09,TAO非活动组眼外直肌EEC值分别为0.49±0.05、0.50±0.08、0.57±0.10、0.55±0.09。TAO活动组眼外直肌Emax值分别为1.35±0.09、1.28±0.09、1.21±0.17、1.25±0.10,TAO非活动组眼外直肌Emax值分别为1.04±0.06、1.05±0.10、1.20±0.19、1.16±0.11。TAO活动组眼外直肌WC(5 min)值分别为0.13±0.03、0.13±0.03、0.13±0.06、0.13±0.03,TAO非活动组眼外直肌WC5min值分别为0.08±0.02、0.79±0.03、0.11±0.06、0.09± 0.03。TAO组眼外直肌的EEC(χ(2)=9.20,P<0.05)、Emax和WC(5min)值显著低于CG组(P<0.05)。IAG组眼内直肌和下直肌EOM的EEC、Emax和WC(5min)值显著低于AG组(P<0.05)。IAG组上直肌EOM的WC(5min)值显著低于AG组(P<0.05)。IAG组和AG组外直肌和上直肌EOM的EEC和Emax值无差异(P>0.05)。IAG组和AG组外直肌EOM的WC(5min)值无差异(P>0.05)。平均EEC、平均Emax和平均WC(5min)的曲线下面积(AUC)分别为0.771、0.879、0.898。DCE-MRI的半定量参数可显示TAO患者的临床活动情况,可作为TAO活动分期的定量指标。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验