• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
About the "surprise question".关于“突发问题”。
CMAJ. 2017 Jun 12;189(23):E807. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.733083.
2
Surprise Questions for Survival Prediction in Patients With Advanced Cancer: A Multicenter Prospective Cohort Study.晚期癌症患者生存预测的意外问题：一项多中心前瞻性队列研究
Oncologist. 2015 Jul;20(7):839-44. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2015-0015. Epub 2015 Jun 8.
3
Adding a second surprise question triggers general practitioners to increase the thoroughness of palliative care planning: results of a pilot RCT with cage vignettes.添加第二个意外问题会促使全科医生提高姑息治疗计划的彻底性：使用笼式案例的试点 RCT 结果。
BMC Palliat Care. 2018 Apr 19;17(1):64. doi: 10.1186/s12904-018-0312-6.
4
Utility of the "Surprise" Question in Predicting Survival among Older Patients with Acute Surgical Conditions.“意外”问题在预测老年急性外科疾病患者生存率中的效用
J Palliat Med. 2017 Apr;20(4):420-423. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2016.0313. Epub 2016 Nov 1.
5
Prognostic significance of the "surprise" question in cancer patients.癌症患者中“意外”问题的预后意义。
J Palliat Med. 2010 Jul;13(7):837-40. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2010.0018.
6
Utility of the NECPAL CCOMS-ICO tool and the Surprise Question as screening tools for early palliative care and to predict mortality in patients with advanced chronic conditions: A cohort study.NECPAL CCOMS-ICO 工具和意外问题作为早期姑息治疗的筛选工具以及预测晚期慢性疾病患者死亡率的效用：一项队列研究。
Palliat Med. 2017 Sep;31(8):754-763. doi: 10.1177/0269216316676647. Epub 2016 Nov 4.
7
Response to: "About the 'surprise question'".对《关于“惊喜问题”》的回应。
CMAJ. 2017 Jun 12;189(23):E808. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.733094.
8
The 'surprise' question in advanced cancer patients: A prospective study among general practitioners.晚期癌症患者的“意外”问题：全科医生的一项前瞻性研究。
Palliat Med. 2014 Jul;28(7):959-964. doi: 10.1177/0269216314526273. Epub 2014 Mar 24.
9
Using the 'surprise question' can identify people with advanced heart failure and COPD who would benefit from a palliative care approach.使用“意外问题”可以识别出那些能从姑息治疗方法中受益的晚期心力衰竭和慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者。
Palliat Med. 2011 Jun;25(4):382. doi: 10.1177/0269216311401949.
10
The utility and value of the "surprise question" for patients with serious illness.“意外问题”对重症患者的效用和价值。
CMAJ. 2017 Aug 21;189(33):E1072-E1073. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.733231.

引用本文的文献

1
The Surprise Question and clinician-predicted prognosis: systematic review and meta-analysis.意外问题与临床医生预测的预后：系统评价与荟萃分析
BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2024 Dec 25;15(1):12-35. doi: 10.1136/spcare-2024-004879.
2
The prognostic value of the 12-, 6-, 3- and 1-month 'Surprise Question' in cancer patients: A prospective cohort study in three hospitals.12 个月、6 个月、3 个月和 1 个月“意外问题”对癌症患者预后的预测价值：三所医院的前瞻性队列研究。
Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2022 Nov;31(6):e13551. doi: 10.1111/ecc.13551. Epub 2022 Jan 26.
3
GP perceptions of the adequacy of community-based care for patients with advanced heart failure in a UK region (NI): a qualitative study.英国某地区（北爱尔兰）全科医生对晚期心力衰竭患者社区护理充足性的看法：一项定性研究
Open Heart. 2018 Apr 5;5(1):e000734. doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2017-000734. eCollection 2018.
4
Response to: "About the 'surprise question'".对《关于“惊喜问题”》的回应。
CMAJ. 2017 Jun 12;189(23):E808. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.733094.

本文引用的文献

1
The "surprise question" for predicting death in seriously ill patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.预测重症患者死亡的“意外问题”：系统评价与荟萃分析
CMAJ. 2017 Apr 3;189(13):E484-E493. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.160775.
2
Palliative care from diagnosis to death.从诊断到死亡的姑息治疗。
BMJ. 2017 Feb 27;356:j878. doi: 10.1136/bmj.j878.
3
Utility of the NECPAL CCOMS-ICO tool and the Surprise Question as screening tools for early palliative care and to predict mortality in patients with advanced chronic conditions: A cohort study.NECPAL CCOMS-ICO 工具和意外问题作为早期姑息治疗的筛选工具以及预测晚期慢性疾病患者死亡率的效用：一项队列研究。
Palliat Med. 2017 Sep;31(8):754-763. doi: 10.1177/0269216316676647. Epub 2016 Nov 4.
4
Utility of the "Surprise" Question in Predicting Survival among Older Patients with Acute Surgical Conditions.“意外”问题在预测老年急性外科疾病患者生存率中的效用
J Palliat Med. 2017 Apr;20(4):420-423. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2016.0313. Epub 2016 Nov 1.
5
The 'surprise' question in advanced cancer patients: A prospective study among general practitioners.晚期癌症患者的“意外”问题：全科医生的一项前瞻性研究。
Palliat Med. 2014 Jul;28(7):959-964. doi: 10.1177/0269216314526273. Epub 2014 Mar 24.
6
Predicting palliative care needs and mortality in end stage renal disease: use of an at-risk register.预测终末期肾病患者的姑息治疗需求和死亡率：使用风险登记册。
BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2015 Mar;5(1):19-25. doi: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000165. Epub 2013 Mar 12.
7
Symptoms and quality of life in late stage Parkinson syndromes: a longitudinal community study of predictive factors.晚期帕金森综合征的症状和生活质量：一项预测因素的纵向社区研究。
PLoS One. 2012;7(11):e46327. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0046327. Epub 2012 Nov 7.
8
Palliative care: Based on neither diagnosis nor prognosis, but patient and family need. Commentary on Chattoo and Atkin.姑息治疗：基于患者及家属的需求，而非诊断或预后。对查托和阿特金的评论。
Soc Sci Med. 2009 Jul;69(2):154-7; discussion 158-9. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.04.024. Epub 2009 Jun 12.

About the "surprise question".

作者信息

Costantini Massimo, Higginson Irene J, Merlo Domenico F, Di Leo Silvia, Tanzi Silvia

机构信息

Scientific Director, Azienda Ospedaliera Arcispedale Santa Maria Nuova - IRCCS, Reggio Emilia, Italy.

Professor, Cicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care, Policy & Rehabilitation, King's College London, London, UK.

出版信息

CMAJ. 2017 Jun 12;189(23):E807. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.733083.

DOI:10.1503/cmaj.733083
PMID:28606980
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5468108/
Abstract
摘要