• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
The utility and value of the "surprise question" for patients with serious illness.“意外问题”对重症患者的效用和价值。
CMAJ. 2017 Aug 21;189(33):E1072-E1073. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.733231.
2
The authors respond to "The utility and value of the 'surprise question' for patients with serious illness".作者们对“针对重症患者的‘意外问题’的效用和价值”做出回应。
CMAJ. 2017 Aug 21;189(33):E1074. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.733267.
3
Surprise Questions for Survival Prediction in Patients With Advanced Cancer: A Multicenter Prospective Cohort Study.晚期癌症患者生存预测的意外问题：一项多中心前瞻性队列研究
Oncologist. 2015 Jul;20(7):839-44. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2015-0015. Epub 2015 Jun 8.
4
Utility of the "Surprise" Question in Predicting Survival among Older Patients with Acute Surgical Conditions.“意外”问题在预测老年急性外科疾病患者生存率中的效用
J Palliat Med. 2017 Apr;20(4):420-423. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2016.0313. Epub 2016 Nov 1.
5
Utility of the NECPAL CCOMS-ICO tool and the Surprise Question as screening tools for early palliative care and to predict mortality in patients with advanced chronic conditions: A cohort study.NECPAL CCOMS-ICO 工具和意外问题作为早期姑息治疗的筛选工具以及预测晚期慢性疾病患者死亡率的效用：一项队列研究。
Palliat Med. 2017 Sep;31(8):754-763. doi: 10.1177/0269216316676647. Epub 2016 Nov 4.
6
The 'surprise' question in advanced cancer patients: A prospective study among general practitioners.晚期癌症患者的“意外”问题：全科医生的一项前瞻性研究。
Palliat Med. 2014 Jul;28(7):959-964. doi: 10.1177/0269216314526273. Epub 2014 Mar 24.
7
Prognostic significance of the "surprise" question in cancer patients.癌症患者中“意外”问题的预后意义。
J Palliat Med. 2010 Jul;13(7):837-40. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2010.0018.
8
Adding a second surprise question triggers general practitioners to increase the thoroughness of palliative care planning: results of a pilot RCT with cage vignettes.添加第二个意外问题会促使全科医生提高姑息治疗计划的彻底性：使用笼式案例的试点 RCT 结果。
BMC Palliat Care. 2018 Apr 19;17(1):64. doi: 10.1186/s12904-018-0312-6.
9
Using the 'surprise question' can identify people with advanced heart failure and COPD who would benefit from a palliative care approach.使用“意外问题”可以识别出那些能从姑息治疗方法中受益的晚期心力衰竭和慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者。
Palliat Med. 2011 Jun;25(4):382. doi: 10.1177/0269216311401949.
10
Reliability and Utility of the Surprise Question in CKD Stages 4 to 5.4至5期慢性肾脏病中意外问题的可靠性和实用性
Am J Kidney Dis. 2017 Jul;70(1):93-101. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2016.11.025. Epub 2017 Feb 15.

引用本文的文献

1
Association of advance care planning with hospital use and costs at the end of life: a population-based retrospective cohort study.预先医疗照护计划与末期病患之住院使用情形及费用关联性：以族群为基础之回溯性世代研究。
BMJ Open. 2024 Nov 7;14(11):e082766. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-082766.
2
Implementing palliative care education into primary care practice: a qualitative case study of the CAPACITI pilot program.将姑息治疗教育纳入初级保健实践：CAPACITI 试点计划的定性案例研究。
BMC Palliat Care. 2023 Sep 28;22(1):143. doi: 10.1186/s12904-023-01265-7.
3
Association between Goals of Care Designation orders and health care resource use among seriously ill older adults in acute care: a multicentre prospective cohort study.在急性护理中，有指定医疗照护目标意愿书与重病老年人的医疗资源使用之间的关联：一项多中心前瞻性队列研究。
CMAJ Open. 2022 Nov 1;10(4):E945-E955. doi: 10.9778/cmajo.20210155. Print 2022 Oct-Dec.
4
End of life care for infants, children and young people (ENHANCE): Protocol for a mixed methods evaluation of current practice in the United Kingdom [version 1; peer review: 2 approved].婴儿、儿童和青少年临终关怀（ENHANCE）：英国当前实践混合方法评估方案[第1版；同行评审：2人批准]
NIHR Open Res. 2022 May 13;2:37. doi: 10.3310/nihropenres.13273.1.
5
The GP's perceived role and use of language concerning the existential dimension of palliative patients: a Dutch interview study.全科医生对晚期患者存在维度的角色认知和语言使用：荷兰访谈研究。
BMC Prim Care. 2022 Jul 26;23(1):182. doi: 10.1186/s12875-022-01789-6.
6
Predictors of Mortality in Patients with Advanced Cancer-A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.晚期癌症患者死亡率的预测因素——一项系统评价与Meta分析
Cancers (Basel). 2022 Jan 11;14(2):328. doi: 10.3390/cancers14020328.
7
Observational study of agreement between attending and trainee physicians on the surprise question: "Would you be surprised if this patient died in the next 12 months?".观察性研究：在“如果这个患者在接下来的 12 个月内去世，你会感到惊讶吗？”这个问题上，主治医生和住院医师之间的一致性。
PLoS One. 2021 Feb 25;16(2):e0247571. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0247571. eCollection 2021.
8
End-of-life outcomes with or without early palliative care: a propensity score matched, population-based cancer cohort study.有无早期姑息治疗的临终结局：一项倾向评分匹配的基于人群的癌症队列研究。
BMJ Open. 2021 Feb 12;11(2):e041432. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-041432.
9
Screening with the double surprise question to predict deterioration and death: an explorative study.双重意外问题筛查预测恶化和死亡：一项探索性研究。
BMC Palliat Care. 2019 Dec 27;18(1):118. doi: 10.1186/s12904-019-0503-9.
10
Eliminating the Surprise Question Leaves Home Care Providers With Few Options for Identifying Mortality Risk.消除“意外问题”使得家庭护理提供者在识别死亡风险方面几乎没有选择。
Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2020 Jul;37(7):542-548. doi: 10.1177/1049909119892830. Epub 2019 Dec 6.

本文引用的文献

1
The "surprise question" for predicting death in seriously ill patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.预测重症患者死亡的“意外问题”：系统评价与荟萃分析
CMAJ. 2017 Apr 3;189(13):E484-E493. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.160775.
2
Can we predict which hospitalised patients are in their last year of life? A prospective cross-sectional study of the Gold Standards Framework Prognostic Indicator Guidance as a screening tool in the acute hospital setting.我们能否预测哪些住院患者处于生命的最后一年？一项关于金标准框架预后指标指南作为急性医院环境中筛查工具的前瞻性横断面研究。
Palliat Med. 2014 Sep;28(8):1046-52. doi: 10.1177/0269216314536089. Epub 2014 May 22.
3
Identifying acute coronary syndrome patients approaching end-of-life.识别接近生命终点的急性冠状动脉综合征患者。
PLoS One. 2012;7(4):e35536. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0035536. Epub 2012 Apr 18.
4
Prognostic indices for older adults: a systematic review.老年人预后指标的系统评价。
JAMA. 2012 Jan 11;307(2):182-92. doi: 10.1001/jama.2011.1966.
5
Barriers to hospice care and referrals: survey of physicians' knowledge, attitudes, and perceptions in a health maintenance organization.临终关怀护理及转诊的障碍：对健康维护组织中医生的知识、态度及认知的调查
J Palliat Med. 2004 Jun;7(3):411-8. doi: 10.1089/1096621041349518.

The utility and value of the "surprise question" for patients with serious illness.

作者信息

Romo Rafael D, Lynn Joanne

机构信息

Assistant Professor, University of Virginia School of Nursing, Charlottesville, Va.

Director, Center for Elder Care and Advanced Illness, Altarum Institute, Washington, DC.

出版信息

CMAJ. 2017 Aug 21;189(33):E1072-E1073. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.733231.

DOI:10.1503/cmaj.733231
PMID:28827439
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5566609/
Abstract
摘要