Rao Krishna D, Shahrawat Renu, Bhatnagar Aarushi
Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, United States of America.
National Institute of Health and Family Welfare, New Delhi, India.
WHO South East Asia J Public Health. 2016 Sep;5(2):133-140. doi: 10.4103/2224-3151.206250.
The availability of reliable and comprehensive information on the health workforce is crucial for workforce planning. In India, routine information sources on the health workforce are incomplete and unreliable. This paper addresses this issue and provides a comprehensive picture of India's health workforce.
Data from the 68th round (July 2011 to June 2012) of the National Sample Survey on the Employment and unemployment situation in India were analysed to produce estimates of the health workforce in India. The estimates were based on self-reported occupations, categorized using a combination of both National Classification of Occupations (2004) and National Industrial Classification (2008) codes.
Findings suggest that in 2011-2012, there were 2.5 million health workers (density of 20.9 workers per 10 000 population) in India. However, 56.4% of all health workers were unqualified, including 42.3% of allopathic doctors, 27.5% of dentists, 56.1% of Ayurveda, yoga and naturopathy, Unani, Siddha and homoeopathy (AYUSH) practitioners, 58.4% of nurses and midwives and 69.2% of health associates. By cadre, there were 3.3 qualified allopathic doctors and 3.1 nurses and midwives per 10 000 population; this is around one quarter of the World Health Organization benchmark of 22.8 doctors, nurses and midwives per 10 000 population. Out of all qualified workers, 77.4% were located in urban areas, even though the urban population is only 31% of the total population of the country. This urban-rural difference was higher for allopathic doctors (density 11.4 times higher in urban areas) compared to nurses and midwives (5.5 times higher in urban areas).
The study highlights several areas of concern: overall low numbers of qualified health workers; a large presence of unqualified health workers, particularly in rural areas; and large urban-rural differences in the distribution of qualified health workers.
获取有关卫生人力的可靠且全面的信息对于人力规划至关重要。在印度,关于卫生人力的常规信息来源不完整且不可靠。本文探讨了这一问题,并提供了印度卫生人力的全面情况。
对印度第68轮(2011年7月至2012年6月)全国就业与失业情况抽样调查的数据进行分析,以得出印度卫生人力的估计数。这些估计数基于自我报告的职业,使用《国家职业分类(2004年)》和《国家产业分类(2008年)》代码的组合进行分类。
研究结果表明,2011 - 2012年,印度有250万卫生工作者(密度为每万人口20.9名工作者)。然而,所有卫生工作者中有56.4%不合格,其中包括42.3%的西医医生、27.5%的牙医、56.1%的阿育吠陀、瑜伽和自然疗法、尤纳尼、悉达和顺势疗法(AYUSH)从业者、58.4%的护士和助产士以及69.2%的卫生助理。按干部类别计算,每万人口中有3.3名合格的西医医生和3.1名护士及助产士;这约为世界卫生组织每万人口22.8名医生、护士和助产士基准的四分之一。在所有合格工作者中,77.4%位于城市地区,尽管城市人口仅占该国总人口的31%。与护士和助产士(城市地区密度高5.5倍)相比,西医医生的城乡差异更大(城市地区密度高11.4倍)。
该研究突出了几个令人担忧的领域:合格卫生工作者总体数量少;不合格卫生工作者大量存在,尤其是在农村地区;以及合格卫生工作者分布存在巨大城乡差异。