Department of Medicine and Surgery, Parma University, Parma, Italy.
Second Anesthesia, ICU and Pain Therapy, Parma University Hospital, Parma, Italy.
Minerva Anestesiol. 2017 Oct;83(10):1089-1100. doi: 10.23736/S0375-9393.17.12077-8. Epub 2017 Jun 12.
Routine use of regional anesthesia for patients having surgery is supported by general safety and proven effectiveness as a targeted modality in the prevention and treatment of acute pain. Recently, perioperative physicians have become much more interested in improving long-term outcomes after surgery rather than focusing on the well-established short-term benefits of regional anesthesia. This interest has raised important questions regarding the potential influence of regional anesthesia on morbidity and mortality, persistent pain and cancer prognosis. Tissue injury is responsible for the inflammatory reaction and physiologic stress response observed during the perioperative period and can influence a patient's recovery trajectory. Regional anesthesia can modulate the inflammatory response through the direct anti-inflammatory effect of local anesthetics, blocking neural afferents, and blunting sympathetic activation. Moreover, continuous techniques (e.g., epidural and perineural catheters) that provide longer duration and titratable pain relief in the perioperative period may be protective against the development of persistent post-surgical pain by providing effective acute pain management and decreasing exposure to opioids. To maximize the potential for long-term outcome benefits to surgical patients, continuous regional anesthesia techniques are preferred over single injection techniques. Although the data are not yet definitive, some studies have demonstrated better functional recovery after joint replacement and lower rates of cancer recurrence in patients treated with continuous regional anesthesia. Future research studies in regional anesthesia will have to focus on these long-term patient-centered outcomes and may need to incorporate novel study designs and analyses of big data.
常规使用区域麻醉来为接受手术的患者提供支持,这一做法具有广泛的安全性,并已被证明是预防和治疗急性疼痛的有效靶向治疗方法。最近,围手术期医生对改善手术后的长期预后越来越感兴趣,而不是专注于区域麻醉已确立的短期益处。这种兴趣引发了关于区域麻醉对发病率和死亡率、持续性疼痛和癌症预后的潜在影响的重要问题。组织损伤是围手术期观察到的炎症反应和生理应激反应的原因,可能会影响患者的康复轨迹。区域麻醉可以通过局部麻醉剂的直接抗炎作用、阻断神经传入和减轻交感神经激活来调节炎症反应。此外,在围手术期提供更长时间和可滴定止痛效果的连续技术(如硬膜外和神经周围导管)可能通过提供有效的急性疼痛管理和减少阿片类药物的暴露来预防持续性术后疼痛的发展。为了使手术患者获得长期预后的潜在益处最大化,连续区域麻醉技术优于单次注射技术。尽管数据尚不确定,但一些研究表明,接受连续区域麻醉治疗的患者在关节置换后功能恢复更好,癌症复发率更低。未来的区域麻醉研究必须关注这些以患者为中心的长期预后,并可能需要采用新的研究设计和大数据分析。