Zhao Yinshan, Kondo Yumi, Traboulsee Anthony, Li David Kb, Riddehough Andrew, Petkau A John
MS/MRI Research Group, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
Department of Statistics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
Mult Scler J Exp Transl Clin. 2015 Apr 24;1:2055217315577829. doi: 10.1177/2055217315577829. eCollection 2015 Jan-Dec.
An abnormal increase of contrast-enhancing lesion (CEL) counts on frequent MRIs is interpreted as a signal of potential worsening in multiple sclerosis (MS) clinical trials. We demonstrate the utility of the MR personalized activity index (MR-pax) to identify such increases.
We analyzed a previous Phase II study in relapsing patients ( = 167) with MRIs at screening, baseline and months 1-6. We performed five consecutive reviews at 90-day intervals. At each review, we evaluate the MR-pax for each patient and also identify those who meet the rule-of-five (an ad-hoc guideline currently in use). To evaluate its clinical relevance, we assess the relation between having a small MR-pax (≤0.05; indicating an unexpected CEL increase) and relapse status in the 12 weeks post-review.
Of the 399 patient reviews, 35 cases met the rule-of-five; 35 had an MR-pax ≤ 0.05; 18 met both criteria. The proportions experiencing clinical relapse are 63% among those meeting the rule-of-five, 61% among those with MR-pax ≤0.05, and 83% for those meeting both criteria, more than double the rate of those meeting neither criterion (40%).
A guideline combining this new personalized index and the existing threshold-based criterion is able to better identify patients with a higher risk of experiencing relapses.
在多发性硬化症(MS)临床试验中,频繁的磁共振成像(MRI)上增强病变(CEL)计数异常增加被视为疾病可能恶化的信号。我们证明了磁共振个性化活动指数(MR-pax)在识别此类增加方面的效用。
我们分析了一项先前针对复发型患者(n = 167)的II期研究,这些患者在筛查、基线以及第1至6个月时进行了MRI检查。我们每隔90天进行连续五次评估。每次评估时,我们评估每位患者的MR-pax,并确定那些符合“五法则”(一种目前正在使用的临时指南)的患者。为了评估其临床相关性,我们评估了MR-pax较小(≤0.05;表明CEL意外增加)与评估后12周内复发状态之间的关系。
在399次患者评估中,35例符合“五法则”;35例MR-pax≤0.05;18例同时符合这两个标准。符合“五法则”的患者中临床复发的比例为63%,MR-pax≤0.05的患者中为61%,同时符合两个标准的患者中为83%,是两个标准都不符合的患者(40%)的两倍多。
将这个新的个性化指数与现有的基于阈值的标准相结合的指南能够更好地识别复发风险较高的患者。