Division of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Wan Fang Hospital, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Wan Fang Hospital, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Cancer. 2017 Oct 15;123(20):3904-3915. doi: 10.1002/cncr.30823. Epub 2017 Jun 13.
Few large, prospective, randomized studies have investigated the value and optimal application of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery (trimodality therapy) or definitive concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) for patients with thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (TESCC).
The authors analyzed data from patients with TESCC in the Taiwan Cancer Registry database. To compare their outcomes, patients with TESCC were enrolled and categorized into the following groups according to treatment modality: group 1, those who underwent surgery alone; group 2, those who received trimodality therapy; and group 3, those who received definitive CCRT. Group 1 was used as the control arm for investigating the risk of mortality after treatment.
In total, 3522 patients who had TESCC without distant metastasis were enrolled. Multivariate Cox regression analysis indicated that a Charlson comorbidity index score ≥3, American Joint Committee on Cancer stage ≥IIA, earlier year of diagnosis, alcohol consumption, cigarette smoking, and definitive CCRT were significant, independent predictors of a poor prognosis. After adjustment for confounders, adjusted hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for overall mortality in patients with clinical stage I, IIA, IIB, IIIA, IIIB, and IIIC TESCC were 2.01 (95% CI, 0.44-6.18), 1.65 (95% CI, 0.99-2.70), 1.48 (95% CI, 0.91-2.42), 0.66 (95% CI, 1.08-1.14), 0.39 (95% CI, 0.26-0.57), and 0.44 (95% CI, 0.24-0.83), respectively, in group 2; and 2.06 (95% CI, 1.18-3.59), 2.65 (95% CI, 1.76-4.00), 2.25 (95% CI, 1.49-3.39), 1.34 (95% CI, 0.79-2.28), 0.82 (95% CI, 0.57-1.17), and 0.93 (95% CI, 0.51-1.71), respectively, in group 3.
Trimodality therapy may be beneficial for the survival of patients with advanced-stage (IIIA-IIIC) TESCC, and CCRT might be an alternative to surgery alone in these patients. Cancer 2017;123:3904-15. © 2017 American Cancer Society.
鲜有大型、前瞻性、随机研究调查过新辅助放化疗后手术(三联疗法)或根治性同期放化疗(CCRT)在胸段食管鳞癌(TESCC)患者中的价值和最佳应用。
作者分析了来自台湾癌症登记数据库的 TESCC 患者数据。为了比较其结果,根据治疗方式将 TESCC 患者纳入以下组:组 1,仅接受手术治疗;组 2,接受三联疗法;组 3,接受根治性 CCRT。组 1 用作治疗后死亡率的对照臂进行研究。
共纳入了 3522 例无远处转移的 TESCC 患者。多变量 Cox 回归分析表明,Charlson 合并症指数评分≥3、美国癌症联合委员会分期≥IIA、较早的诊断年份、酒精摄入、吸烟和根治性 CCRT 是预后不良的显著独立预测因素。调整混杂因素后,临床分期为 I、IIA、IIB、IIIA、IIIB 和 IIIC 的 TESCC 患者的总体死亡率的调整后危险比和 95%置信区间(CI)分别为 2.01(95%CI,0.44-6.18)、1.65(95%CI,0.99-2.70)、1.48(95%CI,0.91-2.42)、0.66(95%CI,1.08-1.14)、0.39(95%CI,0.26-0.57)和 0.44(95%CI,0.24-0.83),在组 2 中;而在组 3 中分别为 2.06(95%CI,1.18-3.59)、2.65(95%CI,1.76-4.00)、2.25(95%CI,1.49-3.39)、1.34(95%CI,0.79-2.28)、0.82(95%CI,0.57-1.17)和 0.93(95%CI,0.51-1.71)。
三联疗法可能有益于晚期(IIIA-IIIC)TESCC 患者的生存,CCRT 可能是这些患者手术治疗的替代方案。癌症 2017;123:3904-15。©2017 美国癌症协会。