Melton M Stephen, Monroe Hanni E, Qi Wenjing, Lewis Stephanie L, Nielsen Karen C, Klein Stephen M
From the Departments of *Anesthesiology and †Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.
Anesth Analg. 2017 Jul;125(1):313-319. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000002180.
The effect of interscalene block (ISB) on pulmonary function of obese participants has not been investigated. The goal of this study is to assess the association of obesity (body mass index [BMI] >29 kg/m vs BMI <25 kg/m) and change in forced vital capacity (FVC) and forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) after ISB in participants undergoing outpatient shoulder surgery.
This prospective, observational cohort study compared obese (BMI >29 kg/m) and normal-weight (BMI <25 kg/m) groups undergoing ISB for ambulatory shoulder surgery, on preblock and postblock FVC and FEV1, at 30 minutes postblock and in the postanesthesia care unit (PACU). The primary outcome in this study was FVC% change (percentage change from preblock to postblock values of FVC) at 30 minutes postblock in the supine position. Secondary outcomes included FVC% change at PACU and in the sitting position, FEV1% change (percentage change from preblock to postblock values of FEV1), FVC, FEV1, incidence of diaphragmatic paresis, modified Borg scale for perceived dyspnea, Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale scores for sedation, and intraoperative airway events.
Fourteen participants were recruited to each group. The mean (standard deviation) BMI in the normal-weight and obese groups was 23 (1.7) and 33 (3.1) kg/m, respectively. ISB success rate was 100%. All participants demonstrated hemidiaphragmatic paresis after ISB. Compared to the normal-weight group, in the sitting position, the obese group had a significant decrease in FVC% change at 30 minutes (-30 [10.5] vs -23 [7.2], P = .046) and an FEV1% change in the PACU (-40 [12.6] vs -27 [13.9], P = .02). No difference was found for measurements taken in the supine position. A repeated-measures analysis demonstrated that, adjusted for position, there is no significant group effect on FVC% change or FEV1% change from 30 minutes to PACU. The 2 groups were not different in terms of breathlessness and sedation at 30 minutes (P = .67, P = .48, respectively) and in the PACU (P = .69, P > .99, respectively) nor in the occurrence of intraoperative airway events (P > .99).
ISB is associated with greater FVC and FEV1 reductions in obese participants undergoing shoulder surgery compared to normal-weight participants. Neither time (30 minutes versus PACU) nor position (sitting versus supine) affected this relationship. Despite these changes, obesity was not associated with increased clinical respiratory symptoms or events.
尚未研究肌间沟阻滞(ISB)对肥胖参与者肺功能的影响。本研究的目的是评估肥胖(体重指数[BMI]>29 kg/m² 与BMI<25 kg/m²)与门诊肩部手术参与者在ISB后用力肺活量(FVC)和第1秒用力呼气量(FEV₁)变化之间的关联。
这项前瞻性观察性队列研究比较了接受ISB进行门诊肩部手术的肥胖(BMI>29 kg/m²)和正常体重(BMI<25 kg/m²)组,在阻滞前和阻滞后的FVC和FEV₁,阻滞后30分钟以及在麻醉后护理单元(PACU)的情况。本研究的主要结局是仰卧位阻滞后30分钟时FVC%变化(FVC从阻滞前到阻滞后值的百分比变化)。次要结局包括PACU和坐位时的FVC%变化、FEV₁%变化(FEV₁从阻滞前到阻滞后值的百分比变化)、FVC、FEV₁、膈肌麻痹的发生率、用于感知呼吸困难的改良Borg量表、用于镇静的Richmond躁动 - 镇静量表评分以及术中气道事件。
每组招募了14名参与者。正常体重组和肥胖组的平均(标准差)BMI分别为23(1.7)和33(3.1)kg/m²。ISB成功率为100%。所有参与者在ISB后均表现出半侧膈肌麻痹。与正常体重组相比,坐位时,肥胖组在30分钟时FVC%变化显著降低(-30[10.5]对-23[7.2],P = 0.046),在PACU时FEV₁%变化显著降低(-40[12.6]对-27[13.9],P = 0.02)。仰卧位测量未发现差异。重复测量分析表明,校正体位后,从30分钟到PACU,两组对FVC%变化或FEV₁%变化没有显著的组间效应。两组在30分钟时(分别为P = 0.67,P = 0.48)和在PACU时(分别为P = 0.69,P>.99)的呼吸困难和镇静情况以及术中气道事件的发生率(P>.99)均无差异。
与正常体重参与者相比,接受肩部手术的肥胖参与者中,ISB与更大程度的FVC和FEV₁降低相关。时间(30分钟与PACU)和体位(坐位与仰卧位)均未影响这种关系。尽管有这些变化,但肥胖与临床呼吸症状或事件增加无关。