Montesano Adrián, Feixas Guillem, Caspar Franz, Winter David
Department of Personality, Assessment and Psychological Treatments, Universitat de BarcelonaBarcelona, Spain.
Psychopathology and Psychotherapy Research Unit, School of Psychology, Universidade do MinhoBraga, Portugal.
Front Psychol. 2017 May 30;8:877. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00877. eCollection 2017.
Negative self-views have proved to be a consistent marker of vulnerability for depression. However, recent research has shown that a particular kind of cognitive conflict, implicative dilemma, is highly prevalent in depression. In this study, the relevance of these conflicts is assessed as compared to the cognitive model of depression of a negative view of the self. In so doing, 161 patients with major depression and 110 controls were assessed to explore negative self-construing (self-ideal discrepancy) and conflicts (implicative dilemmas), as well as severity of symptoms. Results showed specificity for the clinical group indicating a pattern of mixed positive and negative self-descriptions with a high rate of conflict. Regression analysis lent support to the conflict hypothesis in relation to clinically relevant indicators such as symptom severity, global functioning. However, self-ideal discrepancy was a stronger predictor of group membership. The findings showed the relevance of cognitive conflicts to compliment the well-consolidated theory of negative self-views. Clinical implications for designing interventions are discussed.
消极的自我认知已被证明是抑郁症易感性的一个持续标志。然而,最近的研究表明,一种特殊的认知冲突,即蕴含性两难,在抑郁症中非常普遍。在本研究中,将这些冲突的相关性与消极自我认知的抑郁症认知模型进行了比较评估。为此,对161名重度抑郁症患者和110名对照组进行了评估,以探讨消极的自我建构(自我-理想差异)和冲突(蕴含性两难)以及症状的严重程度。结果显示临床组具有特异性,表明存在积极和消极自我描述混合且冲突率高的模式。回归分析支持了与症状严重程度、整体功能等临床相关指标相关的冲突假说。然而,自我-理想差异是组成员身份的更强预测因素。研究结果表明认知冲突与完善的消极自我认知理论相辅相成的相关性。讨论了设计干预措施的临床意义。