• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

迷你腹腔镜手术与传统腹腔镜手术治疗良性附件肿块的比较

Mini-Laparoscopic Versus Conventional Laparoscopic Surgery for Benign Adnexal Masses.

作者信息

Gencdal Servet, Aydogmus Huseyin, Aydogmus Serpil, Kolsuz Zafer, Kelekci Sefa

机构信息

Obstetrics and Gynecology Clinic, Izmir Ataturk Education and Research Hospital, Ministry of Health, Izmir, Turkey.

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, Izmir Katip Celebi University, Izmir, Turkey.

出版信息

J Clin Med Res. 2017 Jul;9(7):613-617. doi: 10.14740/jocmr3060w. Epub 2017 May 22.

DOI:10.14740/jocmr3060w
PMID:28611862
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5458659/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Minimally invasive endoscopic surgery has become an acceptable method for gynecologic indications for more than 20 years. We aimed to compare clinical and surgical outcomes between mini-laparoscopic surgery (MLS) and conventional laparoscopic surgery (CLS) for benign adnexal masses. As far as we know, no comparative study exists between these two minimal invasive procedures.

METHODS

During the period between January 2014 and December 2016, a total number of 132 laparoscopic surgeries were performed for bening adnexal masses in our clinic. Seventy women underwent CLS and 62 women underwent MLS. Pathological results and operating time of procedures, estimated blood loss, preoperative and postoperative complications, patient scale and observer scale (POSAS) and length of hospital stay were recorded.

RESULTS

There was no difference between the two groups regarding preoperative diagnosis, intraoperative surgical procedure performed, and length of hospital stay. The groups were compared in terms of postoperative pathological diagnosis using the Chi-square test, and there was a statistically significant difference between the two groups. Comparing the operation time and hematocrit change, there were statistically significant differences between the two groups. Both patient and observer PSOAS scar scores were better in MLS group (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Mini-laparoscopy can be safely and effectively used to perform benign adnexal mass surgery.

摘要

背景

微创内镜手术已成为20多年来妇科疾病可接受的治疗方法。我们旨在比较迷你腹腔镜手术(MLS)和传统腹腔镜手术(CLS)治疗良性附件肿块的临床和手术结果。据我们所知,这两种微创手术之间尚无比较研究。

方法

2014年1月至2016年12月期间,我们诊所共对132例良性附件肿块患者进行了腹腔镜手术。70例患者接受CLS,62例患者接受MLS。记录手术的病理结果、手术时间、估计失血量、术前和术后并发症、患者量表和观察者量表(POSAS)以及住院时间。

结果

两组在术前诊断、术中实施的手术操作和住院时间方面无差异。采用卡方检验对两组术后病理诊断进行比较,两组间存在统计学显著差异。比较手术时间和血细胞比容变化,两组间存在统计学显著差异。MLS组患者和观察者的PSOAS瘢痕评分均更好(P < 0.05)。

结论

迷你腹腔镜可安全有效地用于良性附件肿块手术。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6874/5458659/8f1b99f7c2fd/jocmr-09-613-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6874/5458659/5742024973ab/jocmr-09-613-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6874/5458659/8f1b99f7c2fd/jocmr-09-613-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6874/5458659/5742024973ab/jocmr-09-613-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6874/5458659/8f1b99f7c2fd/jocmr-09-613-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Mini-Laparoscopic Versus Conventional Laparoscopic Surgery for Benign Adnexal Masses.迷你腹腔镜手术与传统腹腔镜手术治疗良性附件肿块的比较
J Clin Med Res. 2017 Jul;9(7):613-617. doi: 10.14740/jocmr3060w. Epub 2017 May 22.
2
Single Port Transumbilical Laparoscopic Surgery versus Conventional Laparoscopic Surgery for Benign Adnexal Masses: A Retrospective Study of Feasibility and Safety.单孔经脐腹腔镜手术与传统腹腔镜手术治疗良性附件肿块的比较:一项关于可行性和安全性的回顾性研究
Chin Med J (Engl). 2016 Jun 5;129(11):1305-10. doi: 10.4103/0366-6999.182829.
3
Comparison of single-incision and conventional laparoscopic surgery for benign adnexal masses.单孔腹腔镜手术与传统腹腔镜手术治疗良性附件肿物的比较
Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol. 2017 Oct;26(5):278-283. doi: 10.1080/13645706.2017.1299763. Epub 2017 Mar 14.
4
Postoperative Outcomes after Single-port Laparoscopic Removal of Adnexal Masses in Patients Referred to Gynecologic Oncology at a Large Academic Center.大型学术中心妇科肿瘤患者单孔腹腔镜下附件肿物切除术后的结局
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2017 Nov-Dec;24(7):1136-1144. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2017.06.023. Epub 2017 Jun 30.
5
Predictors of clinical outcomes in the laparoscopic management of adnexal masses.附件肿物腹腔镜治疗临床结局的预测因素
Obstet Gynecol. 2003 Aug;102(2):243-51. doi: 10.1016/s0029-7844(03)00480-0.
6
Laparoscopic management of adnexal masses.附件肿物的腹腔镜治疗
JSLS. 2001 Apr-Jun;5(2):143-51.
7
Laparoscopic Single-Port versus Mini-Laparoscopic Hysterectomy: An International Study.腹腔镜单孔与迷你腹腔镜子宫切除术:一项国际研究。
Gynecol Obstet Invest. 2022;87(6):381-388. doi: 10.1159/000526834. Epub 2022 Oct 21.
8
Laparoscopic versus laparotomic surgery for adnexal masses: role in elderly.腹腔镜手术与开腹手术治疗附件肿块:对老年人的作用
World J Surg Oncol. 2016 Apr 7;14:105. doi: 10.1186/s12957-016-0861-1.
9
The impact of laparoscopic surgery in the management of adnexal masses.腹腔镜手术在附件肿物管理中的影响。
Mt Sinai J Med. 1999 Jan;66(1):31-4.
10
Gasless laparoendoscopic single-site surgery for management of adnexal masses during pregnancy.无气腹腹腔镜单孔手术治疗妊娠期附件肿物
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2014 Sep;180:28-34. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2014.06.019. Epub 2014 Jun 30.

引用本文的文献

1
The Future in Standards of Care for Gynecologic Laparoscopic Surgery to Improve Training and Education.改善培训与教育的妇科腹腔镜手术护理标准的未来。
J Clin Med. 2022 Apr 14;11(8):2192. doi: 10.3390/jcm11082192.
2
Single-Port Laparoscopic Surgery for Adnexal Mass Removal During Pregnancy: The Initial Experience of a Single Institute.单孔腹腔镜手术治疗孕期附件肿物:单中心的初步经验
Front Med (Lausanne). 2022 Feb 15;8:800180. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2021.800180. eCollection 2021.

本文引用的文献

1
Low vs standard pneumoperitoneum pressure during laparoscopic hysterectomy: prospective randomized trial.腹腔镜子宫切除术中低气腹压力与标准气腹压力的比较:前瞻性随机试验
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2014 May-Jun;21(3):466-71. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2013.12.091. Epub 2013 Dec 25.
2
Minilaparoscopic myomectomy: a mini-invasive technical variant.迷你腹腔镜子宫肌瘤切除术:一种微创技术变体。
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2013 Oct;23(10):871-5. doi: 10.1089/lap.2013.0037. Epub 2013 Aug 31.
3
Microlaparoscopic bilateral adnexectomy: a 3-mm umbilical port and a pair of 2-mm ancillary trocars served as conduits.
经脐微腹腔镜双侧附件切除术:使用一个 3 毫米的脐部端口和一对 2 毫米的辅助套管作为通道。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Mar;210(3):279.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2013.08.014. Epub 2013 Aug 14.
4
Laparoscopic, minilaparoscopic and single-port hysterectomy: perioperative outcomes.腹腔镜、迷你腹腔镜和单孔腹腔镜子宫切除术:围手术期结果。
Surg Endosc. 2012 Dec;26(12):3592-6. doi: 10.1007/s00464-012-2377-2. Epub 2012 Jun 8.
5
Minilaparoscopic versus conventional laparoscopic hysterectomy: results of a randomized trial.迷你腹腔镜与传统腹腔镜子宫切除术:随机试验结果。
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2011 Jul-Aug;18(4):455-61. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2011.03.019. Epub 2011 Jun 2.
6
A prospective randomized comparison of traditional laparoendoscopic single-site surgery with needlescopic-assisted laparoscopic nephrectomy in the porcine model.传统经脐单孔腹腔镜手术与针辅助腹腔镜肾切除术在猪模型中的前瞻性随机比较。
J Endourol. 2011 Jul;25(7):1187-91. doi: 10.1089/end.2010.0623. Epub 2011 Jun 1.
7
Needlescopic versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a meta-analysis.针式腹腔镜与传统腹腔镜胆囊切除术:一项荟萃分析。
ANZ J Surg. 2009 Jun;79(6):437-42. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-2197.2009.04945.x.
8
Laparoscopic adrenalectomy using needlescopic instruments for adrenal tumors less than 5cm in 112 cases.采用针式腹腔镜器械对112例直径小于5厘米的肾上腺肿瘤行腹腔镜肾上腺切除术。
Eur Urol. 2008 Sep;54(3):640-6. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2007.12.028. Epub 2007 Dec 26.
9
Laparoscopy versus laparotomy for benign ovarian tumor: a systematic review and meta-analysis.腹腔镜手术与开腹手术治疗良性卵巢肿瘤的比较:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2008 May-Jun;18(3):387-99. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1438.2007.01045.x. Epub 2007 Aug 10.
10
Advantages of mini-laparoscopic vs conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy: results of a prospective randomized trial.迷你腹腔镜与传统腹腔镜胆囊切除术的优势:一项前瞻性随机试验的结果
Arch Surg. 2005 Dec;140(12):1178-83. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.140.12.1178.