Yadav Usha, Anjaria K B, Nairy Rajesha, Shirsath K B, Desai Utkarsha N, Chaurasia Rajesh K, Bhat Nagesh N, Sapra B K
Radiological Physics and Advisory Division, Bhabha Atomic Research Centre, Trombay, Mumbai, 400085, India.
Department of Studies in Physics, Mangalore University, Mangalore, Karnataka, 574199, India.
Radiat Environ Biophys. 2017 Aug;56(3):227-239. doi: 10.1007/s00411-017-0699-0. Epub 2017 Jun 13.
To explore possible applications of iodoacetate (IA), a glycolytic inhibitor, in cancer treatment, we screened its cytotoxicity and radioprotective/sensitizing efficacy in three different mammalian cell lines; A549 (human lung carcinoma), MCF7 (human mammary cancer), a non-cancerous CHO (Chinese hamster ovary) cells and human lymphocytes. Experiments were carried out using IA concentrations ranging from 0.01 to 2.5 µg/ml, with or without Coγ-radiation. In the outcomes, IA was found to exhibit higher toxicity in the cancer cells, whereas it was non-toxic/marginally toxic to the non-cancerous cells. Considerably higher glucose uptake in both cancer cells lines was observed indicating higher rates of glycolysis. IA significantly inhibited glycolysis as reflected by GAPDH activity inhibition. Radiomodifying effects of IA were found to be concentration dependent in both cancerous and non-cancerous cells. The response in non-cancerous was found to be biphasic: at lower concentrations, it offered significant radioprotection; however, the protection decreased with increasing concentration. Moreover, at the highest tested concentration, marginal radiosensitization was also observed (as indicated by clonogenic assay). In both cancer cells, IA offered significant amount of radiosensitization which was considerably high at higher concentrations. Further experiments were carried out to estimate the Dose Modification Factor (DMF) to quantify and compare relative radiosensitization by IA in cancer and normal cell lines. The DMF was calculated for three different concentrations of IA, 0.5, 1, and 1.5 µg/ml, and corresponding values were found to be 1.26, 1.43, and 1.89 for A549 cancer cells, whereas for normal CHO cells, it was 1.13, 1.13, and 1.24. In conclusion, differential killing and radiosensitizing effects of IA suggest that it may have potential use as a anticancer agent and radiosensitizer in cancer therapy.
为了探索糖酵解抑制剂碘乙酸盐(IA)在癌症治疗中的潜在应用,我们在三种不同的哺乳动物细胞系中筛选了其细胞毒性以及辐射防护/增敏效果,这三种细胞系分别为:A549(人肺癌细胞)、MCF7(人乳腺癌细胞)、非癌性的CHO(中国仓鼠卵巢)细胞以及人淋巴细胞。实验使用的IA浓度范围为0.01至2.5μg/ml,实验过程中有或无钴γ辐射。结果发现,IA对癌细胞表现出更高的毒性,而对非癌细胞无毒/毒性极小。观察到两种癌细胞系中的葡萄糖摄取量显著更高,表明糖酵解速率更高。IA通过抑制甘油醛-3-磷酸脱氢酶(GAPDH)活性,显著抑制了糖酵解。IA的辐射修饰作用在癌细胞和非癌细胞中均呈浓度依赖性。在非癌细胞中的反应呈双相性:在较低浓度下,它提供显著的辐射防护;然而,随着浓度增加,防护作用降低。此外,在最高测试浓度下,也观察到了轻微的辐射增敏作用(克隆形成试验表明)。在两种癌细胞中,IA都提供了显著的辐射增敏作用,且在较高浓度下相当高。进一步开展实验以估计剂量修正因子(DMF),从而量化并比较IA在癌细胞系和正常细胞系中的相对辐射增敏作用。针对IA的三种不同浓度(0.5、1和1.5μg/ml)计算了DMF,结果发现,对于A549癌细胞,相应的值分别为1.26、1.43和1.89,而对于正常CHO细胞,其值分别为1.13、1.13和1.24。总之,IA的差异杀伤和辐射增敏作用表明,它可能在癌症治疗中具有作为抗癌剂和辐射增敏剂的潜在用途。