Department of Pediatric Surgical Superspecialties, Sanjay Gandhi Post Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Raebareli Road, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, 226014, India.
Department of Pediatric Gastroenterology, Sanjay Gandhi Post Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Raebareli Road, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Indian J Pediatr. 2017 Sep;84(9):691-699. doi: 10.1007/s12098-017-2390-5. Epub 2017 Jun 14.
The two cornerstones of management for Extrahepatic portal vein obstruction (EHPVO) are endotherapy and surgery [Porto-systemic shunts (PSS)/Mesorex bypass (MRB)]. Endotherapy is the mainstay of treatment for acute variceal bleed control and has also been used extensively for secondary prophylaxis till variceal eradication is achieved. However, long-term follow-up beyond endoscopic eradication of esophageal varices (EEEV) indicates that there are numerous delayed bleed and non bleed sequelae of EHPVO, which merit surgery as a definitive procedure to decompress the hypertensive portal venous system. While endotherapy obliterates natural porto-systemic collaterals in the gastroesophageal region, persistently raised portal pressures manifest as an increase in secondary isolated gastric varices, ectopic varices, portal hypertensive vasculopathy, issues related to massive splenomegaly, portal biliopathy, growth retardation and hence impaired quality of life (QOL). An ideal management strategy should address both bleed and non-bleed consequences of EHPVO and translate into a near normal QOL. Further, MRB has opened up new dimensions to the management philosophy of EHPVO. This review article critically evaluates the role of surgery and endotherapy based on available literature and authors' own experience.Surgery and endotherapy are complementary. However, with increasing duration of follow-up post EEEV, it is evident that there is resurgence in the role of surgery (PSS/MRB) as a single one time definitive procedure for alleviating all bleed and delayed non bleed sequelae of EHPVO.Surgery for EHPVO (PSS/MRB) should not be allowed to become a dying art and future generations of surgeons should continue to receive training in this specialized area of surgery.
肝外门静脉阻塞(EHPVO)的两种治疗基石是内镜治疗和手术[门体分流术(PSS)/中结肠旁路术(MRB)]。内镜治疗是急性静脉曲张出血控制的主要治疗方法,也广泛用于二级预防,直到实现静脉曲张根除。然而,内镜根除食管静脉曲张(EEEV)后的长期随访表明,EHPVO 存在许多迟发性出血和非出血的后果,这需要手术作为减压高压门静脉系统的确定性治疗方法。虽然内镜治疗消除了胃食管区域的自然门体侧支循环,但持续升高的门静脉压力表现为继发性孤立性胃静脉曲张、异位静脉曲张、门静脉高压性血管病变、与巨大脾肿大相关的问题、门脉性胆病、生长迟缓,从而降低生活质量(QOL)。理想的管理策略应同时解决 EHPVO 的出血和非出血后果,并转化为接近正常的 QOL。此外,MRB 为 EHPVO 的管理理念开辟了新的维度。本文根据现有文献和作者自身经验,批判性地评估了手术和内镜治疗的作用。手术和内镜治疗是互补的。然而,随着 EEEV 后随访时间的延长,手术(PSS/MRB)作为一种单一的确定性治疗方法,缓解 EHPVO 的所有出血和迟发性非出血后果的作用再次凸显。EHPVO 的手术(PSS/MRB)不应成为一门垂死的艺术,未来几代外科医生应继续接受这一专门外科领域的培训。