Goncalves Rodrigo, DeSchryver Katherine, Ma Cynthia, Tao Yu, Hoog Jeremy, Cheang Maggie, Crouch Erika, Dahiya Neha, Sanati Souzan, Barnes Michael, Sarian Luis Otávio Zanatta, Olson John, Allred Donald Craig, Ellis Matthew J
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, State University of Campinas (UNICAMP), Campinas, Brazil.
Department of Medical Oncology, Breast Cancer Program, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2017 Sep;165(2):355-364. doi: 10.1007/s10549-017-4329-y. Epub 2017 Jun 13.
The recent publication of the ACOSOG Z1031 trial results demonstrated that Ki-67 proliferation marker-based neoadjuvant endocrine therapy response monitoring could be used for tailoring the use of adjuvant chemotherapy in ER+HER2-negative breast cancer patients. In this paper, we describe the development of the Ki-67 clinical trial assay used for this study.
Ki-67 assay assessment focused on reproducing a 2.7% Ki-67 cut-point (CP) required for calculating the Preoperative Endocrine Prognostic Index and a 10% CP for poor endocrine therapy response identification within the first month of neoadjuvant endocrine treatment. Image analysis was assessed to increase the efficiency of the scoring process. Clinical outcome concordance for two independent Ki-67 scores was the primary performance metric.
Discordant scores led to a triage approach where cases with complex histological features that software algorithms could not resolve were flagged for visual point counting (17%). The final Ki-67 scoring approach was run on T1/2 N0 cases from the P024 and POL trials (N = 58). The percent positive agreement for the 2.7% CP was 87.5% (95% CI 61.7-98.5%); percent negative agreement 88.9% (95% CI: 65.3-98.6%). Minor discordance did not affect the ability to predict similar relapse-free outcomes (Log-Rank P = 0.044 and P = 0.055). The data for the 10% early triage CP in the POL trial were similar (N = 66), the percentage positive agreement was 100%, and percent negative agreement 93.55% (95% CI: 78.58-99.21%). The independent survival predictions were concordant (Log-rank P = 0.0001 and P = 0.01).
We have developed an efficient and reproducible Ki-67 scoring system that was approved by the Clinical Trials Evaluation Program for NCI-supported neoadjuvant endocrine therapy trials. Using the methodology described here, investigators are able to identify a subgroup of patients with ER+HER2-negative breast cancer that can be safely managed without the need of adjuvant chemotherapy.
美国外科医师学会肿瘤学组(ACOSOG)Z1031试验结果近期发表,表明基于Ki-67增殖标志物的新辅助内分泌治疗反应监测可用于指导雌激素受体(ER)阳性、人表皮生长因子受体2(HER2)阴性乳腺癌患者辅助化疗的使用。在本文中,我们描述了用于该研究的Ki-67临床试验检测方法的开发过程。
Ki-67检测评估重点在于重现计算术前内分泌预后指数所需的2.7% Ki-67切点(CP)以及在新辅助内分泌治疗的第一个月内识别内分泌治疗反应不佳所需的10% CP。对图像分析进行评估以提高评分过程的效率。两个独立Ki-67评分的临床结果一致性是主要性能指标。
不一致的评分导致了一种分类方法,即软件算法无法解析的具有复杂组织学特征的病例被标记出来进行视觉点数(17%)。最终的Ki-67评分方法在P024和POL试验的T1/2 N0病例(N = 58)上进行。2.7% CP的阳性一致率为87.5%(95%可信区间[CI] 61.7 - 98.5%);阴性一致率为88.9%(95% CI:65.3 - 98.6%)。轻微不一致并不影响预测相似无复发生存结果的能力(对数秩检验P = 0.044和P = 0.055)。POL试验中10%早期分类CP的数据相似(N = 66),阳性一致率为100%,阴性一致率为93.55%(95% CI:78.58 - 99.21%)。独立生存预测结果一致(对数秩检验P = 0.0001和P = 0.01)。
我们开发了一种高效且可重复的Ki-67评分系统,该系统已获得美国国立癌症研究所(NCI)支持的新辅助内分泌治疗试验的临床试验评估项目的批准。使用此处描述的方法,研究人员能够识别出一组ER阳性、HER2阴性乳腺癌患者亚组,这些患者无需辅助化疗即可得到安全管理。