Costello S P, Soo W, Bryant R V, Jairath V, Hart A L, Andrews J M
Department of Gastroenterology, The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Woodville, SA, Australia.
School of Medicine, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2017 Aug;46(3):213-224. doi: 10.1111/apt.14173. Epub 2017 Jun 14.
Faecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) is emerging as a novel therapy for ulcerative colitis (UC). Interpretation of efficacy of FMT for UC is complicated by differences among studies in blinding, FMT administration procedures, intensity of therapy and donor stool processing methods.
To determine whether FMT is effective and safe for the induction of remission in active UC.
Medline (Ovid), Embase and the Cochrane Library were searched from inception through February 2017. Original studies reporting remission rates following FMT for active UC were included. All study designs were included in the systematic review and a meta-analysis performed including only randomised controlled trials (RCTs).
There were 14 cohort studies and four RCTs that used markedly different protocols. In the meta-analysis of RCTs, clinical remission was achieved in 39 of 140 (28%) patients in the donor FMT groups compared with 13 of 137 (9%) patients in the placebo groups; odds ratio 3.67 (95% CI: 1.82-7.39, P<.01). Clinical response was achieved in 69 of 140 (49%) donor FMT patients compared to 38 of 137 (28%) placebo patients; odds ratio 2.48 (95% CI: 1.18-5.21, P=.02). In cohort studies, 39 of 168 (24%; 95% CI: 11%-40%) achieved clinical remission.
Despite variation in processes, FMT appears to be effective for induction of remission in UC, with no major short-term safety signals. Further studies are needed to better define dose frequency and preparation methods, and to explore its feasibility, efficacy and safety as a maintenance agent.
粪便微生物群移植(FMT)正在成为治疗溃疡性结肠炎(UC)的一种新疗法。由于各研究在设盲、FMT给药程序、治疗强度和供体粪便处理方法上存在差异,FMT对UC疗效的解读变得复杂。
确定FMT对诱导活动期UC缓解是否有效且安全。
检索了从创刊至2017年2月的Medline(Ovid)、Embase和Cochrane图书馆。纳入报告FMT治疗活动期UC后缓解率的原始研究。所有研究设计均纳入系统评价,仅对随机对照试验(RCT)进行荟萃分析。
有14项队列研究和4项RCT,其使用的方案明显不同。在RCT的荟萃分析中,供体FMT组140例患者中有39例(28%)实现临床缓解,而安慰剂组137例患者中有13例(9%)实现临床缓解;优势比为3.67(95%CI:1.82 - 7.39,P<0.01)。供体FMT组140例患者中有69例(49%)实现临床反应,而安慰剂组137例患者中有38例(28%)实现临床反应;优势比为2.48(95%CI:1.18 - 5.21,P = 0.02)。在队列研究中,168例患者中有39例(24%;95%CI:11% - 40%)实现临床缓解。
尽管过程存在差异,但FMT似乎对诱导UC缓解有效,且无重大短期安全信号。需要进一步研究以更好地确定剂量频率和制备方法,并探索其作为维持治疗药物的可行性、疗效和安全性。