• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
A weight of evidence framework for environmental assessments: Inferring quantities.环境评估的证据权重框架:推断数量
Integr Environ Assess Manag. 2017 Nov;13(6):1045-1051. doi: 10.1002/ieam.1953. Epub 2017 Jul 21.
2
A weight of evidence framework for environmental assessments: Inferring qualities.环境评估的证据权重框架:推断质量。
Integr Environ Assess Manag. 2017 Nov;13(6):1038-1044. doi: 10.1002/ieam.1954. Epub 2017 Jul 21.
3
Recommended updates to the USEPA Framework for Metals Risk Assessment: Aquatic ecosystems.美国环保署金属风险评估框架的推荐更新:水生生态系统。
Integr Environ Assess Manag. 2024 Jul;20(4):924-951. doi: 10.1002/ieam.4827. Epub 2023 Sep 15.
4
Systematic Review and Weight of Evidence Are Integral to Ecological and Human Health Assessments: They Need an Integrated Framework.系统综述和证据权重是生态和人类健康评估的组成部分:它们需要一个综合框架。
Integr Environ Assess Manag. 2020 Sep;16(5):718-728. doi: 10.1002/ieam.4271. Epub 2020 Apr 28.
5
Ambient water quality criteria derived using probabilistic risk assessment.使用概率风险评估得出的环境水质标准。
Integr Environ Assess Manag. 2023 Mar;19(2):501-512. doi: 10.1002/ieam.4683. Epub 2022 Oct 4.
6
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
7
National characterization of pesticide runoff and erosion potential to put USEPA standard ecological scenarios in context for pyrethroids.国家描述农药径流和侵蚀潜力,以便将 USEPA 标准生态情景应用于拟除虫菊酯。
Integr Environ Assess Manag. 2023 Jan;19(1):175-190. doi: 10.1002/ieam.4647. Epub 2022 Jul 4.
8
An automated computational data pipeline to rapidly acquire, score, and rank toxicological data for ecological hazard assessment.一种自动化的计算数据管道,用于快速获取、评分和排列毒理学数据,以进行生态危害评估。
Integr Environ Assess Manag. 2024 Nov;20(6):2203-2217. doi: 10.1002/ieam.4945. Epub 2024 May 16.
9
Polymers Used in US Household Cleaning Products: Assessment of Data Availability for Ecological Risk Assessment.美国家用清洁产品中使用的聚合物:生态风险评估数据可用性评估。
Integr Environ Assess Manag. 2019 Jul;15(4):621-632. doi: 10.1002/ieam.4150.
10
Modeling of local and systemic exposure to metals and metalloids after inhalation exposure: Recommended update to the USEPA metals framework.吸入暴露后金属和类金属的局部和全身暴露建模:美国环保署金属框架的推荐更新。
Integr Environ Assess Manag. 2024 Jul;20(4):952-964. doi: 10.1002/ieam.4880. Epub 2023 Dec 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Laser-Induced Solid-Phase UV Fluorescence Spectroscopy for Rapid Detection of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons in the Land Snail Bioindicator, .用于快速检测陆地蜗牛生物指示物中多环芳烃的激光诱导固相紫外荧光光谱法
Biosensors (Basel). 2025 Jul 14;15(7):450. doi: 10.3390/bios15070450.
2
Main Challenges of Incorporating Environmental Impacts in the Economic Evaluation of Health Technology Assessment: A Scoping Review.将环境影响纳入健康技术评估经济评价的主要挑战:范围综述。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Mar 11;20(6):4949. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20064949.
3
Clearly weighing the evidence in read-across can improve assessments of data-poor chemicals. 在进行数据缺乏化学品的评估时,仔细权衡同源物的证据可以改善评估。
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2022 Mar;129:105111. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2021.105111. Epub 2021 Dec 30.
4
Open Science in regulatory environmental risk assessment.监管环境风险评估中的开放科学。
Integr Environ Assess Manag. 2021 Nov;17(6):1229-1242. doi: 10.1002/ieam.4433. Epub 2021 May 18.
5
How Specific Is Site-Specific? A Review and Guidance for Selecting and Evaluating Approaches for Deriving Local Water Quality Benchmarks.位点特异性有多具体?选择和评估推导局部水质基准方法的综述和指南。
Integr Environ Assess Manag. 2019 Sep;15(5):683-702. doi: 10.1002/ieam.4181.
6
A weight of evidence framework for environmental assessments: Inferring qualities.环境评估的证据权重框架:推断质量。
Integr Environ Assess Manag. 2017 Nov;13(6):1038-1044. doi: 10.1002/ieam.1954. Epub 2017 Jul 21.

本文引用的文献

1
A weight of evidence framework for environmental assessments: Inferring qualities.环境评估的证据权重框架:推断质量。
Integr Environ Assess Manag. 2017 Nov;13(6):1038-1044. doi: 10.1002/ieam.1954. Epub 2017 Jul 21.
2
A weight-of-evidence approach for deriving a level of concern for atrazine that is protective of aquatic plant communities.一种基于证据权重法得出对水生植物群落具有保护作用的阿特拉津关注水平的方法。
Integr Environ Assess Manag. 2017 Jul;13(4):686-701. doi: 10.1002/ieam.1865. Epub 2017 Jan 18.
3
Cross-species coherence in effects and modes of action in support of causality determinations in the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's Integrated Science Assessment for Lead.美国环境保护局铅综合科学评估中支持因果关系判定的效应和作用模式的跨物种一致性
Toxicology. 2015 Apr 1;330:19-40. doi: 10.1016/j.tox.2015.01.015. Epub 2015 Jan 28.
4
Weight-of-evidence evaluation in environmental assessment: review of qualitative and quantitative approaches.环境评估中的证据权重评估:定性与定量方法综述
Sci Total Environ. 2009 Sep 15;407(19):5199-205. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2009.05.004. Epub 2009 Jul 19.
5
Using field data and weight of evidence to develop water quality criteria.利用实地数据和证据权重制定水质标准。
Integr Environ Assess Manag. 2008 Oct;4(4):490-504. doi: 10.1897/IEAM_2008-018.1.
6
THE ENVIRONMENT AND DISEASE: ASSOCIATION OR CAUSATION?环境与疾病:关联还是因果关系?
Proc R Soc Med. 1965 May;58(5):295-300. doi: 10.1177/003591576505800503.
7
Can meta-analyses be trusted?
Lancet. 1991 Nov 2;338(8775):1127-30. doi: 10.1016/0140-6736(91)91975-z.

环境评估的证据权重框架:推断数量

A weight of evidence framework for environmental assessments: Inferring quantities.

作者信息

Suter Glenn, Cormier Susan, Barron Mace

机构信息

US Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, National Center for Environmental Assessment, Cincinnati, Ohio.

US Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, National Health and Environmental, Effects Research Laboratory, Gulf Ecology Division, Gulf Breeze, Florida.

出版信息

Integr Environ Assess Manag. 2017 Nov;13(6):1045-1051. doi: 10.1002/ieam.1953. Epub 2017 Jul 21.

DOI:10.1002/ieam.1953
PMID:28613402
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5726517/
Abstract

The US Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) has developed a generally applicable framework for a weight-of-evidence (WoE) process for deriving quantitative values from multiple estimates. These guidelines are intended for environmental assessments that require the generation of quantitative parameters such as degradation rates or that develop quantitative products such as criterion values or magnitudes of effects. The basic steps are to weigh evidence for the environmental quality to be quantified, generate the value by merging estimates or by identifying the best estimate, and weight the results to determine confidence in the numerical value. When multiple data sets or outputs of multiple models are available, it may be appropriate to weigh the evidence. Use of the framework to weigh multiple estimates may increase the accuracy of quantitative results compared to a single estimate from a default method. Its use can provide greater transparency compared to ad hoc weighing of evidence. Integr Environ Assess Manag 2017;13:1045-1051. Published 2017. This article is a US Government work and is in the public domain in the USA.

摘要

美国环境保护局(USEPA)已制定了一个普遍适用的证据权重(WoE)流程框架,用于从多个估计值中得出定量数值。这些指南适用于需要生成降解率等定量参数或制定诸如准则值或影响程度等定量产品的环境评估。基本步骤是权衡待量化环境质量的证据,通过合并估计值或确定最佳估计值来生成数值,并权衡结果以确定对该数值的置信度。当有多个数据集或多个模型的输出时,权衡证据可能是合适的。与默认方法的单一估计值相比,使用该框架权衡多个估计值可能会提高定量结果的准确性。与临时权衡证据相比,使用该框架可以提供更高的透明度。《综合环境评估与管理》2017年;13:1045 - 1051。2017年发表。本文是美国政府的作品,在美国属于公共领域。