Suppr超能文献

不予复苏,无替代决策者且无预先指示:一个伦理案例研究。

Do Not Resuscitate, with No Surrogate and No Advance Directive: An Ethics Case Study.

作者信息

Diamond Jamie, Gidwani Umesh, Rhodes Rosamond

机构信息

473 Columbus Ave., Apt 2C, New York, New York 10024 USA.

Icahn School of Medicine, Department of Cardiology, 1 Gustave Levy Place, Box 1030, New York, New York 10029 USA.

出版信息

J Clin Ethics. 2017 Summer;28(2):159-162.

Abstract

Do-not-resuscitate (DNR) orders are typically signed by physicians in conjunction with patients or their surrogate decision makers in order to instruct healthcare providers not to perform cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). Both the medical literature and CPR guidelines fail to address when it is appropriate for physicians to sign DNR orders without any knowledge of a patient's wishes. We explore the ethical issues surrounding instituting a two-physician DNR for a dying patient with multiple comorbidities and no medical record on file, no advance directives, and no surrogate decision maker. Through this case we also highlight the issues of poor prognostication and the reversal of a DNR in such circumstances.

摘要

不要复苏(DNR)医嘱通常由医生与患者或其替代决策者共同签署,以指示医疗保健提供者不进行心肺复苏(CPR)。医学文献和心肺复苏指南均未涉及医生在不了解患者意愿的情况下何时适合签署DNR医嘱。我们探讨了为一名患有多种合并症、没有病历存档、没有预先指示且没有替代决策者的临终患者制定双医生DNR医嘱所涉及的伦理问题。通过这个案例,我们还强调了预后不良以及在这种情况下撤销DNR医嘱的问题。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验